枢经刮痧治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床观察
Clinical Observation of Shujing Guasha Therapy for Lateral Epicondylitis of the Humerus
DOI: 10.12677/tcm.2025.1412802, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 谢君萍, 王开龙*:广西中医药大学第一附属医院康复医学科,广西 南宁
关键词: 肱骨外上髁炎枢经刮痧局部封闭法临床观察Lateral Epicondylitis of the Humerus Shuijing Guasha Local Injection Therapy Clinical Observation
摘要: 目的:探讨枢经刮痧疗法对肱骨外上髁炎的临床疗效。方法:将60例肱骨外上髁炎的受试者随机数字表法随机分为2组,即治疗组30例,予枢经刮痧法治疗,对照组30例,予局部封闭疗法(局封)治疗。对照组采用局部封闭疗法,取曲安奈得40 mg和2%利多卡因100 mg,对痛点做常规封闭。应用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和改良肘关节评分系统(HSS2)进行评分,观察治疗后疼痛缓解情况及疗程结束后临床疗效。结果:两组患者的VAS评分在治疗后均显著降低(P < 0.01),其中治疗组的评分下降幅度更为明显。HSS2较治疗前均升高,治疗组升高更明显,治疗组总有效率90.00%,对照组总有效率76.66%,治疗组(枢经刮痧法)与对照组(局部封闭法)对肱骨外上髁炎的临床疗效相当(P > 0.05)。结论:枢经刮痧法治疗效果较局封闭法对肱骨外上髁炎好,且枢经刮痧法疗效更突出,效果更明显。枢经刮痧法与局部封闭疗法在改善肱骨外上髁炎患者疼痛和总体疗效上无统计学差异(P > 0.05),但枢经刮痧在改善肘关节功能(HSS2评分)方面可能更具优势。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of Shuijing Guasha therapy for lateral epicondylitis of the humerus. Methods: Sixty subjects with lateral epicondylitis were randomly assigned using a random number table into two groups: the treatment group (n = 30) received Shuijing Guasha therapy, and the control group (n = 30) received local injection therapy (LI). The control group received local injection therapy using 40 mg triamcinolone and 100 mg 2% lidocaine for routine block injection at the pain point. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and modified Hospital for Special Surgery 2 (HSS2) were used to assess pain relief and clinical efficacy after treatment. Results: VAS scores significantly decreased in both groups after treatment (P < 0.01), with a more pronounced reduction in the treatment group. HSS2 scores increased compared to pre-treatment levels in both groups, with a more pronounced increase in the treatment group. The overall effective rate was 90.00% in the treatment group and 76.66% in the control group. The clinical efficacy of the treatment group (Shuijing Guasha Therapy) and the control group (Local Injection Therapy) for lateral epicondylitis of the humerus was comparable (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Shuijing Guasha therapy demonstrates superior efficacy compared to local injection therapy for treating lateral epicondylitis of the humerus, exhibiting more pronounced therapeutic effects. There was no statistically significant difference between Shujing Guasha therapy and local injection therapy in improving pain and overall therapeutic efficacy in patients with lateral epicondylitis (P > 0.05). However, Shujing Guasha may demonstrate greater efficacy in improving elbow joint function (HSS2 score).
文章引用:谢君萍, 王开龙. 枢经刮痧治疗肱骨外上髁炎的临床观察[J]. 中医学, 2025, 14(12): 5576-5582. https://doi.org/10.12677/tcm.2025.1412802

参考文献

[1] 郭倩, 谢思羽, 谢辉, 等. 中西医治疗肱骨外上髁炎的研究进展[J]. 中国疗养医学, 2024, 33(10): 54-58.
[2] Ahmed, A.F., Rayyan, R., Zikria, B.A. and Salameh, M. (2022) Lateral Epicondylitis of the Elbow: An Up-to-Date Review of Management. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 33, 201-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Landesa-Piñeiro, L. and Leirós-Rodríguez, R. (2022) Physiotherapy Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 35, 463-477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Zhou, Y., Chen, C., Yang, Y., Yu, H. and Yang, Z. (2021) Acupuncture Therapy for Tennis Elbow: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine, 100, e24402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 郭林清, 仲景. 揿针针刺局部压痛点治疗肱骨外上髁炎的疗效观察[J]. 天津中医药, 2022, 39(11): 1419-1422.
[6] 何国文, 高大伟, 胡栢均, 等. 穴位贴敷疗法联合体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎30例[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 61-64.
[7] 甘炜, 王韩, 梁英业, 等. 枢经理论指导下针刀联合正骨推拿治疗腰椎间盘突出症缓解期的疗效观察[J]. 中医康复, 2025, 2(9): 7-12.
[8] 林雪婷, 杨培培, 符维艳, 等. 枢经针刀治疗ARCO Ⅰ、Ⅱ期股骨头坏死的临床效果[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(9): 144-149.
[9] 杨鹏, 何凤诗, 庞军, 等. 枢经推拿治疗膝关节慢性创伤性滑膜炎的疗效[J]. 广西医学, 2022, 44(10): 1108-1110+1130.
[10] 田伟. 实用骨科学[M]. 第2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2016: 247-248.
[11] 刘光华, 陈建新, 王平, 等. 局部封闭与体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的疗效对比[J]. 上海医学, 2020, 43(8): 490-494.
[12] 朱丽娜, 李海泽, 刘雅娟, 等. 肌骨超声引导下注射富血小板血浆在肱骨外上髁炎患者术后康复治疗中的应用效果观察[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2025, 18(4): 413-418.
[13] 张梅, 徐维彬, 管倩, 等. 高频超声在评价超声引导富血小板血浆治疗网球肘效果中的应用价值[J]. 中国煤炭工业医学杂志, 2023, 26(5): 487-492.
[14] Arora, K.K., Kapila, R., Kapila, S., et al. (2022) Management of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective Comparative Study Comparing the Local Infiltrations of Leucocyte Enriched Platelet-Rich Plasma (L-aPRP), Glucocorticoid and Normal Saline. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal, 16, 58-69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Sayadi, S., Shahbazi, P., Najafi, A., Ochi, F., Jafarabady, K., Rezaei, M.M., et al. (2023) Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Corticosteroid: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Tennis Elbow Patients Resistant to Nonsurgical Treatments. Annals of Medicine & Surgery, 85, 4385-4388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Shaikh, S.A., Tahir, M. and Ahmed, N. (2023) Clinical Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Local Methylprednisolone Injection in Lateral Epicondylitis. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 39, 1521-1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 庞军, 唐宏亮, 杨扬, 等. 将“枢经”理论引入亚健康领域的探讨[J]. 四川中医, 2007(9): 9-10.
[18] Busillo, J.M. and Cidlowski, J.A. (2013) The Five Rs of Glucocorticoid Action during Inflammation: Ready, Reinforce, Repress, Resolve, and Restore. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 24, 109-119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Nair, A.B., Kumar, S., Dalal, P., Nagpal, C., Dalal, S., Rao, R., et al. (2022) Novel Dermal Delivery Cargos of Clobetasol Propionate: An Update. Pharmaceutics, 14, Article No. 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Karimzadeh, A., Bagheri, S., Raeissadat, S.A., Bagheri, S., Rayegani, S.M., Rahimi-Dehgolan, S., et al. (2019) The Comparison of the Effectiveness between Different Doses of Local Methylprednisolone Injection versus Triamcinolone in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Journal of Pain Research, 12, 579-584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] 雷婷, 施茵, 李燕婷, 等. 刮痧放痧联合电针治疗枕大神经痛: 随机对照试验[J]. 中国针灸, 2024, 44(8): 889-893.