高钙镁钛精矿氧化改性–物理冶金分选协同提钛研究
Study on Synergistic Titanium Extraction from High-Calcium-Magnesium Titanium Concentrate via Oxidative Modification and Physical Metallurgical Separation
DOI: 10.12677/meng.2025.124027, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 费之奎*, 张士举, 王录峰, 费娟, 曹佳译:攀枝花学院钒钛学院,四川 攀枝花
关键词: 浮选高钙镁钛精矿品位回收率Flotation High-Calcium-Magnesium Titanium Concentrate Grade Recovery
摘要: 本文针对高钙镁钛精矿中钙、镁等杂质元素赋存状态复杂、难以高效分离的问题,系统研究了氧化改性技术对其含钛物相赋存状态的影响规律,并探究了物理冶金分选工艺的优化路径。通过设计三因素三水平正交实验(温度800℃~1200℃、时间30~90 min、氧气流量3~5 L/min),结合XRD表征手段,阐明了氧化改性过程中物相演变机制。结果表明,1200℃下保温90 min、氧气流量4 L/min时,钛精矿中TiO2品位为43.99%,钙、镁杂质稀释率分别为32.32%和37.69%,为后续分选奠定物相基础。进一步分析了磁选、浮选及联合工艺的分选效果。研究发现,单独磁选可使TiO2品位从43.99%提升至45.77%,但受限于弱磁性杂质的选择性;以辛酰羟肟酸为捕收剂单独浮选时,精矿TiO2品位为46.39%,回收率为67.74%。磁选–浮选联合分选时:磁选优先脱除Fe氧化物(精矿TiO2品位为45.77%),尾矿经浮选去除Ca、Mg、Al、Si等杂质后,TiO2品位进一步提升至48.95%,较原矿提升4.96%,其回收率达到57.23%。分析表明,氧化改性通过重构金红石相与非含钛物相的物理性质差异,显著增强了分选效率,联合工艺的协同效应使杂质脱除率和钛富集效果最优。
Abstract: Aiming at the problem that impurity elements such as calcium and magnesium in high-calcium-magnesium titanium concentrate have complex occurrence states and are difficult to separate efficiently, this paper systematically studies the influence law of oxidative modification technology on the occurrence state of titanium-bearing phases, and explores the optimization path of physical metallurgical separation processes. By designing a three-factor and three-level orthogonal experiment (temperature: 800˚C~1200˚C, time: 30~90 min, oxygen flow rate: 3~5 L/min) combined with XRD characterization, the phase evolution mechanism during the oxidative modification process is clarified. The results show that when the temperature is 1200˚C, the holding time is 90 min, and the oxygen flow rate is 4 L/min, the TiO2 grade in the titanium concentrate reaches 43.99%, and the dilution rates of calcium and magnesium impurities are 32.32% and 37.69% respectively, laying a phase foundation for subsequent separation. The separation effects of magnetic separation, flotation and combined processes are further analyzed. The study finds that single magnetic separation can increase the TiO2 grade from 43.99% to 45.77%, but it is limited by the selectivity of weakly magnetic impurities. For single flotation with optimized caprylhydroxamic acid collector, the TiO2 grade of the concentrate is 46.39% and the recovery rate is 67.74%. For the magnetic-flotation combined separation: magnetic separation first removes Fe oxides (the TiO2 grade of the concentrate is 45.77%), and after the tailings are subjected to flotation to remove impurities such as Ca, Mg, Al and Si, the TiO2 grade is further increased to 48.95%, which is 4.96 percentage points higher than that of the raw ore, with a recovery rate of 57.23%. Analysis shows that oxidative modification significantly enhances separation efficiency by reconstructing the difference in physical properties between rutile phase and non-titanium-bearing phases, and the synergistic effect of the combined process achieves the optimal impurity removal rate and titanium enrichment effect.
文章引用:费之奎, 张士举, 王录峰, 费娟, 曹佳译. 高钙镁钛精矿氧化改性–物理冶金分选协同提钛研究[J]. 冶金工程, 2025, 12(4): 213-224. https://doi.org/10.12677/meng.2025.124027

参考文献

[1] 赵秦阳, 陈永楠, 徐义库, 等. 钛合金材料低成本化制备技术进展与展望[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2021, 31(11): 3127-3140.
[2] 张鹏飞, 张林嘉, 周瑜, 等. 钛合金精密铸造技术在航空航天领域的应用进展[J]. 航空制造技术, 2025, 68(7): 22-36
[3] 洪权, 郭萍, 周伟. 钛合金成形技术与应用[J]. 钛工业进展, 2022, 39(5): 27-32.
[4] 李政, 陈从喜. 全球钛资源行业发展现状[J]. 地球学报, 2021, 42(2): 245-250.
[5] 聂文林, 阳小勇, 贺紫菲, 等. 世界钛资源分布及利用现状[J]. 金属世界, 2022, 37(3): 14-18.
[6] 包广雄, 荣一阳, 叶国华, 等. 高辉石钛铁矿磁选-浮选联合分离回收钛精矿[J]. 矿冶, 2025, 34(2): 266-273.
[7] 肖建, 马兰, 杨绍利, 等. 低钙高镁钛精矿预氧化过程相变特征研究[J]. 中国有色冶金, 2024, 53(6): 19-29.
[8] 张敏, 陈树民. 某选厂超细粒级选铁尾矿浮选钛精矿试验研究[J]. 钢铁钒钛, 2021, 42(2): 109-116.
[9] Ultarakova, A., Karshyga, Z., Lokhova, N., Yessengaziyev, A., Kassymzhanov, K. and Mukangaliyeva, A. (2022) Studies on the Processing of Fine Dusts from the Electric Smelting of Ilmenite Concentrates to Obtain Titanium Dioxide. Materials, 15, 1326-1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Salehi, H., Seim, S., Kolbeinsen, L. and Safarian, J. (2021) Phase Transitions and Microstructural Changes during Oxidation and Reduction of a Weathered Ilmenite Concentrate. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 38, 743-756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Zhu, F., Ma, S., Ma, Z., Qi, L., Peng, W., Li, K., et al. (2023) Preparation of TiCl4 from Panzhihua Ilmenite Concentrate by Boiling Chlorination. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 23, 2703-2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Wu, S., Li, Z., Sun, T., Lu, S. and Cao, Z. (2022) Individual Enrichment of Titanium and Iron from Low-Titanium Beach Titanomagnetite via Preconcentration-Reduction Roasting and Magnetic Separation with Calcium Fluoride. Powder Technology, 34, 152-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Wan, S.Q., Zou, M., Lan, D.J., Xu, Z. and Ma, G.Q. (2014) The Phase Change Study of Titanium Concentrate during Heat Treatment. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 34, 633-634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 邵彦谋, 郭晋昌. 化工材料钛合金表面热氧化改性研究现状及展望[J]. 当代化工研究, 2023, 21(6): 21-23.
[15] 李亮, 陈爱祥, 李开华, 等. 高钙镁低品位钛渣熔盐氯化关键技术[Z]. 攀钢集团有限公司. 2021-09-13.
[16] Ye, F., Deng, H., Guo, Z., Wei, B. and Ren, X. (2023) Separation Mechanism and Experimental Investigation of Pulsating High Gradient Magnetic Separation. Results in Physics, 49, 231-240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 戴川, 陈攀, 王洪彬, 等. 高纯钛精矿的制备及其强化分离机制研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 55(12): 4397-4405.
[18] 余攀. 外界离子活化微细粒级钛铁矿浮选机理研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2021.
[19] 胡志波, 陈桃, 张子浩, 等. 攀西地区含钛高炉渣中钛的分选研究[J]. 化工矿物与加工, 2021, 50(10): 18-21.
[20] 纪苏, 何起, 李秋菊, 等. 含钛渣中黑钛石相的重选分离试验研究[J]. 钢铁钒钛, 2018, 39(3): 63-68.
[21] 张晓年, 李家珍, 朱发军, 等. 湖北某地金红石选矿新工艺试验[J]. 矿产综合利用, 2016, 197(1): 28-58.
[22] 杨成洁. 改性高钛渣中金红石相的分离研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2008.
[23] 郭宇峰, 屈涵宇, 陈凤, 等. 钛精矿高效分选除杂研究现状[J]. 稀有金属, 2024, 48(12): 1797-1806.
[24] 孙仁斌, 王秋舒, 元春华, 等. 全球钛资源形势分析[J]. 中国矿业, 2019, 28(6): 1-6+12.
[25] 曾招科. SLon立环脉动高梯度磁选机的影响因素研究[J]. 中国设备工程, 2025(6): 145-147.
[26] 杨绍利, 马兰, 王军, 等. 攀西钛资源综合利用技术应用现状及发展方向[J]. 中国有色冶金, 2024, 53(6): 2-12.
[27] 赖启威. 攀西地区低品位钛尾矿回收钛工艺试验研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2024.
[28] 费之奎, 张士举, 王录峰, 等. 氧化改性钛渣含钛物相赋存状态及分选试验研究[J]. 冶金工程, 2025, 12(4): 199-207.
[29] Liang, Y., Wang, J., Fei, Z., Peng, C., An, H. and Fan, Z. (2025) Effect of (NH4)2SO4 Solution Concentration on Bound Water Content in Ion Adsorption Rare-Earth Raw Ore. Metals, 15, 1-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef