数智赋能课程质量建设提升路径与模式创新研究——以《证券投资学》为例
Research on the Enhancement Path and Model Innovation of Course Quality Construction Empowered by Digital Intelligence—A Case Study of the “Securities Investment” Course
摘要: 在数字经济与金融科技深度融合的背景下,传统商科课程面临教学内容滞后、教学模式单一、评价体系片面及教学资源静态化等多重挑战。本研究以金融学核心课程《证券投资学》为实践载体,旨在系统探讨数智技术赋能课程质量建设的系统性路径与整体性模式创新。通过构建“内容–教学–评价–管理”四位一体的数智化课程建设新范式,本研究提出并实践了以“诊断–设计–开发–实施–评估–推广”为核心的课程数智化升级闭环路径。研究实践表明,该模式通过“沉浸式–交互式–探究式”教学模式的深度应用与全过程多元智能评价体系的构建,有效提升了课程的高阶性、创新性与挑战度,显著增强了学生的数据素养、实战能力与综合职业素养。本研究成果为应用型文科课程的系统性数智化转型提供了兼具理论支撑与实践验证、可复制、可推广的解决方案。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the deep integration of the digital economy and financial technology, traditional business courses face multiple challenges, such as outdated teaching content, singular teaching models, one-sided evaluation systems, and static teaching resources. This study takes the core finance course “Securities Investment” as a practical vehicle, aiming to systematically explore the systemic pathways and holistic model innovation for course quality construction empowered by digital intelligence technologies. By constructing a new paradigm for digitally intelligent course construction that integrates “content-teaching-evaluation-management” into a cohesive whole, this study proposes and implements a closed-loop path for course digital intelligence upgrading centered on “diagnosis-design-development-implementation-evaluation-promotion”. Practice has shown that this model, through the deep application of the “immersive, interactive, inquiry-based” teaching mode and the construction of a whole-process, multi-dimensional, and intelligent evaluation system, effectively enhances the course’s advanced nature, innovation, and challenge level, significantly improving students’ data literacy, practical ability, and comprehensive professional competence. The research outcomes provide a theoretically supported and practically verified, replicable, and scalable solution for the systematic digital-intelligent transformation of applied liberal arts courses.
文章引用:刘强, 黄萍, 徐小芳. 数智赋能课程质量建设提升路径与模式创新研究——以《证券投资学》为例[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(12): 1484-1489. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.15122438

参考文献

[1] 吴修国. 数智赋能课程思政融入混合式教学的改革与实践[J]. 高教学刊, 2025, 11(15): 139-143.
[2] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M. and Gouverneur, F. (2019) Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education—Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article No. 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Siemens, G. and Long, P. (2011) Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. Educause Review, 46, 30-40.
[4] Educause (2012) 7 Things You Should Know about Learning Analytics. Educause.
[5] Chulkov, D. and Wang, X. (2020) The Educational Value of Simulation as a Teaching Strategy in a Finance Course. e-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 14, 40-56.
[6] CFA Institute (2021) Global ESG Disclosure Standards for Investment Products.
[7] CFA Institute (2024) Certificate in ESG Investing.
[8] Financial Times (2023) Finance Masters Shift from Idealism to Pragmatism on under Fire ESG. Financial Times.
[9] 王爽爽, 李梅. 开放大学网络教学模式创新研究——以证券投资学课程为例[J]. 吉林工程技术师范学院学报, 2020, 36(3): 53-56.
[10] 叶楠. 高校绿色金融人才培养模式与机制探索[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 21(3): 127-129.
[11] 任敏, 李京, 王峰, 等. 在线课程质量保障体系的探究[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2021(20): 6-10.
[12] 高明华, 杨玥, 杨岚. 应用型本科院校“334”课程质量保障体系建设研究[J]. 农业工程与装备, 2024, 51(1): 36-39.
[13] 孔蕾, 秦洪武, 孔艳艳. 信息技术驱动的外语一流课程质量保障体系建设[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2022, 54(4): 569-579, 640.
[14] 周健, 徐子叶, 汪霞. 学生主体、多元参与: 约翰斯·霍普金斯大学本科生课程质量保障体系研究[J]. 扬州大学学报(高教研究院), 2022, 26(2): 104-112.
[15] 黄侃梅, 张炳达. 互联网金融背景下模拟教学法的应用研究——以《证券投资理论与实务》课程为例[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2014(44): 156-158.
[16] 李利聪, 黄芳. ADDIE教学系统设计模型在教师培训中的应用研究[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2014(52): 21-22.