电商场景下的“二次激怒”效应:心理机制分析与人机协同客服优化策略
The “Secondary Aggravation” Effect in E-Commerce Scenarios: Psychological Mechanism Analysis and Human-AI Collaborative Customer Service Optimization Strategies
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.14124372, PDF,   
作者: 佘雨娜:浙江理工大学理学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 负面情绪AI客服人机协同Negative Emotions AI Customer Service Human-AI Collaborative
摘要: 本文聚焦于电商场景下,AI客服所带来的新型服务困境——“二次激怒”效应,即客户因客观问题产生初始不满后,在与AI客服进行低效、僵化的无效沟通中,负面情绪被进一步激化的现象。本文首先将“二次激怒”置于服务补救与客户愤怒管理的理论谱系中,明确了其作为一种由数智化服务前置环节诱发情绪升级的新机制的理论独特性。进而通过引入挫折–攻击假说、认知失调理论、心理抗拒理论及人本主义心理学的分析视角,揭示了该效应的本质其实是AI系统设计与人性的自主、共情及认知一致性等核心心理需求之间的冲突。基于这些理论机制以及不同种类AI客服在引发“二次激怒”路径上的差异,本文进一步从客户、客服、平台及行业四个层面,梳理了“二次激怒”所带来的多重负面影响。最后,本文构建了一套贯穿“事前预防–事中干预–事后完善–体系保障”全流程的、“针对不同技术路径AI”的人机协同系统化优化方案,为电商平台在智能客服体验的诊断与优化方面提供了兼具理论深度与技术实操性的决策参考。
Abstract: This article focuses on a novel service dilemma arising from AI customer service in e-commerce scenarios—the “secondary aggravation” effect. This phenomenon refers to the further escalation of customers’ negative emotions after initial dissatisfaction caused by objective issues, resulting from inefficient, rigid, and ineffective communication with AI agents. This study first situates “secondary aggravation” within the theoretical framework of service recovery and customer anger management, clarifying its uniqueness as a new mechanism for emotional escalation triggered by the pre-service phase in digitalized services. Furthermore, by drawing on analytical perspectives from the frustration-aggression hypothesis, cognitive dissonance theory, psychological reactance theory, and humanistic psychology, it reveals that the essence of this effect lies in the conflict between the design of AI systems and fundamental human psychological needs, such as autonomy, empathy, and cognitive consistency. Based on these theoretical mechanisms and the differentiated pathways through which various types of AI customer service provoke “secondary aggravation”, this article further delineates the multifaceted negative impacts of this effect across four levels: the customer, the customer service agent, the platform, and the industry. Finally, this article constructs a comprehensive, systemic “human-AI collaborative” optimization strategy that spans the entire customer service journey through four key phases: “prevention, intervention, resolution, and safeguard”, tailored to different technological pathways of AI. This provides e-commerce platforms with decision-making references that integrate theoretical depth and technical practicality for diagnosing and optimizing intelligent customer service experiences.
文章引用:佘雨娜. 电商场景下的“二次激怒”效应:心理机制分析与人机协同客服优化策略[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 4320-4328. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14124372

参考文献

[1] Tax, S.S., Brown, S.W. and Chandrashekaran, M. (1998) Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 62, 60-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Bonifield, C. and Cole, C. (2006) Affective Responses to Service Failure: Anger, Regret, and Retaliatory versus Conciliatory Responses. Marketing Letters, 18, 85-99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 董雨卉. “电商 + AI”的实际应用、问题和对策研究[J]. 北方经贸, 2025(9): 117-123.
[4] Li, B., Liu, L., Mao, W. and Qu, Y. (2022) Does Customers’ Emotion toward Voice-Based Service AI Cause Negative Reactions? Empirical Evidence from a Call Center. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, 4-7 January 2022, 10 p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Yasin, N. (1989) Frustration Aggression Hypothesis: Examination and Reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 59-73.
[6] Harmon-Jones, E. and Mills, J. (2019) An Introduction to Cognitive Dissonance Theory and an Overview of Current Perspectives on the Theory. In: Harmon-Jones E., Ed., Cognitive Dissonance: Reexamining a Pivotal Theory in Psychology (2nd Ediiton), American Psychological Association, 3-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Miron, A.M. and Brehm, J.W. (2006) Reactance Theory—40 Years Later. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 9-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Rogers, C.R. (1975) Empathic: An Unappreciated Way of Being. The Counseling Psychologist, 5, 2-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Zinko, R., Patrick, A., Furner, C.P., Gaines, S., Kim, M.D., Negri, M., et al. (2021) Responding to Negative Electronic Word of Mouth to Improve Purchase Intention. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 1945-1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Crolic, C., Thomaz, F., Hadi, R. and Stephen, A.T. (2021) Blame the Bot: Anthropomorphism and Anger in Customer-Chatbot Interactions. Journal of Marketing, 86, 132-148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 李艳琦. 电商平台AI客服质量对消费者忠诚度的影响研究[J]. 商业经济研究, 2025(10): 77-81.
[12] Azgın, B. (2018) A Review on “Non-Violent Communication: A Language of Life” by Marshall B. Rosenberg. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7, 759-762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 梅琪, 黄旭强. AI赋能电商: 智能工具在运营效率提升中的应用与优化研究[J]. 科技经济市场, 2024(6): 25-28.