基于RSM-DEM的TBM出渣效率优化研究
Research on Optimizing TBM Slurry Discharge Efficiency Based on RSM-DEM
摘要: 本研究旨在通过结合离散元方法(DEM)和响应曲面法(RSM)对全断面隧道掘进机(TBM)的出渣效率进行多参数优化。研究以一台直径7.83 m的TBM刀盘为对象,选取了刀盘掘进速度、刀盘转速、出渣槽长度、出渣槽宽度和溜渣板长度这五个关键的结构与工况参数作为影响因子。研究首先通过单因素仿真分析确定了各因子的有效水平范围,然后基于中心复合设计(CCD)建立了二次回归模型,用以分析各因素及其交互作用对30秒内排渣效率的影响。研究结果表明,各参数间存在显著的交互耦合效应,特别是刀盘转速与其它四项参数的交互作用尤为突出。最终,研究得到了最优参数组合(掘进速度61.5 mm/min,转速7.85 rpm,出渣槽长度810 mm,宽度688 mm,溜渣板长度1852 mm),在此条件下模型预测的排渣率为65.96%,与DEM仿真验证结果(66.34%)的偏差仅为0.57%,证明了优化方法与模型的可靠性。
Abstract: This study aims to perform multi-parameter optimization of the mucking efficiency of a tunnel boring machine (TBM) cutterhead by combining the Discrete Element Method (DEM) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM). A cutterhead with a diameter of 7.83 m was selected as the research object, and five key structural and operational parameters—cutterhead penetration rate, rotation speed, muck chute length, muck chute width, and muck guide plate length—were considered as influencing factors. Single-factor simulation analyses were first conducted to determine the effective level ranges of each factor. Based on the Central Composite Design (CCD), a quadratic regression model was then established to analyze the effects and interactions of these parameters on the mucking efficiency within 30 seconds. The results reveal significant interactive coupling effects among the parameters, with cutterhead rotation speed exhibiting the most prominent interactions with the other four variables. The optimal parameter combination was obtained as follows: penetration rate of 61.5 mm/min, rotation speed of 7.85 rpm, muck chute length of 810 mm, muck chute width of 688 mm, and muck guide plate length of 1852 mm. Under these conditions, the model predicted a mucking rate of 65.96%, which deviated by only 0.57% from the DEM simulation result (66.34%), confirming the reliability of the proposed optimization method and the accuracy of the regression model.
文章引用:邱梓航, 邓立营. 基于RSM-DEM的TBM出渣效率优化研究[J]. 机械工程与技术, 2025, 14(6): 759-777. https://doi.org/10.12677/met.2025.146079

参考文献

[1] 韩美东, 曲传咏, 蔡宗熙, 等. 刀盘掘进过程动态仿真[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2015, 36(8): 1098-1102.
[2] 李建斌. 我国掘进机研制现状、问题和展望[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(6): 877-896.
[3] 翟国强, 张玉锋. 浅谈TBM刀盘的进出渣设计[J]. 建筑机械化, 2013, 34(2): 76-78.
[4] Zheng, J., Zhang, H., Wang, D., et al. (2023) Optimization of Supporting Rib Geometry on TBM Cutterhead to Improve Muck Discharge Efficiency. Civil Engineering Journal, 9, 10106-10120.
[5] 夏毅敏, 杨妹, 吴遁, 等. TBM刀盘出碴槽结构对出碴效率的影响规律[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2018, 39(9): 1561-1567.
[6] Yang, M., Wang, S., Zhang, Y., et al. (2020) Numerical Simulation and Optimization of Muck Bucket Arrangement on TBM Cutterhead Based on DEM. Journal of Central South University, 27, 2981-2992.
[7] Li, M., Zhang, Q., Zhao, X., et al. (2025) Investigation on Muck Removal Efficiency and Performance Optimization of Large-Diameter Hard-Rock TBM Cutterhead. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 162, Article 106637.
[8] 李大平. 基于ABAQUS的TBM刀盘溜碴过程仿真[J]. 建设机械技术与管理, 2013, 26(6): 101-106.
[9] Xia, Y.M., Liu, H., Hu, J., et al. (2024) Numerical Study on TBM Mucking Performance and Optimization of Supporting Ribs. Automation in Construction, 160, Article 105464.
[10] 霍军周, 陈巍, 欧阳湘宇, 等. 基于岩碴流动性的TBM出碴槽口选优设计[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 36(5): 715-718.
[11] 陈巍, 孙伟, 霍军周. TBM刀盘开口面积的确定[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2015(5): 29-31+35.
[12] 唐建国, 彭正阳, 张祥富, 等. 掘进参数对抽水蓄能电站斜井TBM刀盘出渣效率的影响规律[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2022, 42(S2): 29-35.
[13] 耿麒, 谢立扬, 张泽宇, 等. 全断面隧道掘进机刀盘刮碴铲斗结构对出碴性能的影响[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2020, 54(11): 149-157.