数字经济时代政府推动生产性服务业与先进制造业融合发展研究——基于演化博弈视角
Research on Government-Promoted Integrated Development of Productive Services and Advanced Manufacturing in the Digital Economy Era—An Evolutionary Game Perspective
摘要: 为探索数字经济时代政府推动生产性服务业与先进制造业深度融合的路径,本研究构建了政府、生产性服务企业与先进制造企业的三方演化博弈模型,通过设定收益矩阵与稳定性条件,分析各方策略互动机制,并运用Matlab进行数值仿真。结果表明,政府参与意愿、激励成本、融合成本调控及收益分配系数显著影响企业参与融合的积极性。当政府激励成本增量低于社会收益且企业融合收益高于成本时,系统趋于(积极激励,积极参与,积极参与)的理想均衡;反之易陷入低水平均衡。据此提出,政府需动态优化政策、合理控制激励成本、降低企业融合成本、完善收益分配机制并强化数字技术赋能,以提升各方参与意愿,推动两业深度融合,促进产业转型升级与高质量发展。
Abstract: To explore pathways for government-driven deep integration of productive services and advanced manufacturing in the digital economy era, this study constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model involving the government, productive service enterprises, and advanced manufacturing enterprises. By defining a payoff matrix and stability conditions, it analyzes the strategic interaction mechanisms among stakeholders and conducts numerical simulations using MATLAB. Results indicate that the government’s willingness to participate, incentive costs, integration cost regulation, and benefit distribution coefficients significantly influence enterprises’ enthusiasm for integration. When the incremental incentive cost of the government is lower than the social benefits and the integration benefits for enterprises exceed their costs, the system tends toward an ideal equilibrium of (positive incentives, active participation, active participation). Conversely, it is prone to fall into a low-level equilibrium. Based on these findings, it is proposed that the government should dynamically optimize policies, reasonably control incentive costs, reduce integration costs for enterprises, improve the benefit distribution mechanism, and strengthen digital technology empowerment. These measures will enhance the willingness of all parties to participate, promote the deep integration of the two sectors, and facilitate industrial transformation, upgrading, and high-quality development.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
程巧莲, 田也壮. 制造企业服务功能演变与实现路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2008, 29(6): 59-64, 73.
|
|
[2]
|
Sklyar, A., Kowalkowski, C., Tronvoll, B. and Sörhammar, D. (2019) Organizing for Digital Servitization: A Service Ecosystem Perspective. Journal of Business Research, 10, 450-460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
樊瑞莉. 制造业服务化的动因、障碍及促进策略研究[J]. 对外经贸, 2023, 343(1): 18-21.
|
|
[4]
|
White, A.L., Stoughton, M. and Feng, L. (1999) Servicizing: The Quiet Transition to Extended Product Responsibility. Tellus Institute.
|
|
[5]
|
肖挺, 刘华. 中国服务业制造化的产业绩效分析[J]. 软科学, 2013, 27(8): 15-19.
|
|
[6]
|
郭琳. 基于价值链重构的生产性服务业制造化路径研究[J]. 中国物价, 2021(3): 18-21.
|
|
[7]
|
李金华. 中国生产性服务业的结构、布局与前景[J]. 东南学术, 2020(5): 93-103, 246.
|
|
[8]
|
陈元翰. 服务业与制造业深度融合高质量发展探究[J]. 商业经济研究, 2021(7): 184-187.
|
|
[9]
|
贺灵, 陈治亚. “两业”融合对制造业价值链攀升的影响及对策探讨[J]. 理论探讨, 2021(6): 125-131.
|
|
[10]
|
王文静. 山东省现代服务业与先进制造业动态关系及融合水平测度研究[J]. 生产力研究, 2025(7): 55-60.
|
|
[11]
|
刘嘉琳, 汤吉军. 东北地区战略性新兴产业与传统产业融合发展研究——基于动态演化博弈模型分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2020, 460(11): 95-104.
|
|
[12]
|
张尔涛, 赵公民, 武勇杰. 传统高碳产业与清洁绿色产业融合发展动态演化博弈研究[J]. 煤炭经济研究, 2023, 43(2): 32-37.
|