绿色补贴政策下双渠道供应链渠道选择与信息共享策略研究
Study on Channel Choice and Information Sharing Strategy in a Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain under Government Subsidy Policies
摘要: 在绿色消费趋势与政策支持的双重影响下,制造商通过建立绿色供应链体系,实现了经济效益与环境绩效的协同提升。本文构建了一个由单一制造商与零售商组成的双渠道供应链模型,探讨在政府提供绿色补贴的情况下,制造商的销售渠道决策以及零售商的信息共享策略。模型考虑零售商拥有私有市场需求信息,而制造商同时面临环保投资与渠道建设成本的不确定性,据此设定四种策略组合(NN、NE、SN、SE),系统分析绿色补贴系数、环保投资效率及渠道竞争强度等关键变量对供应链成员最优策略与利润的影响。研究发现,绿色补贴有助于降低制造商的绿色投入门槛,并促使其更倾向于采用双渠道结构;在高环保技术效率条件下,信息共享能够实现供应链双方的互利共赢;此外,适度的渠道入侵成本可能激励零售商主动共享信息,从而提升制造商的利润水平。本研究为政府制定绿色补贴政策及企业间协同合作机制提供了理论依据。
Abstract: Under the dual influence of the growing green consumption trend and supportive environmental policies, manufacturers can achieve the simultaneous improvement of economic performance and environmental outcomes by establishing green supply chain systems. This paper develops a dual-channel supply chain model consisting of a single manufacturer and a retailer to investigate the manufacturer’s channel selection decisions and the retailer’s information-sharing strategy in the presence of government-provided green subsidies. The model assumes that the retailer possesses private market demand information, while the manufacturer faces uncertainty related to environmental investment and channel establishment costs. Based on these assumptions, four strategic scenarios are examined: single-channel sales without information sharing, dual-channel sales without information sharing, single-channel sales with information sharing, and dual-channel sales with information sharing. The impacts of key factors—namely the green subsidy rate, environmental investment efficiency, and channel competition intensity—on the optimal strategies and profits of supply chain members are systematically analyzed. The results indicate that green subsidies help lower the threshold for manufacturers’ green investments and increase their incentives to adopt a dual-channel structure. When environmental technology efficiency is sufficiently high, information sharing leads to a win–win outcome for both parties. Moreover, a moderate level of channel encroachment cost may motivate the retailer to voluntarily share information, thereby enhancing the manufacturer’s profit. This study provides theoretical insights for governments in designing green subsidy policies and for firms in developing cooperative mechanisms within green supply chains.
文章引用:葛珅宇, 徐琪. 绿色补贴政策下双渠道供应链渠道选择与信息共享策略研究[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2026, 15(1): 23-36. https://doi.org/10.12677/mse.2026.151003

参考文献

[1] Srivastava, S.K. (2007) Green Supply‐Chain Management: A State‐of‐the‐art Literature Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 53-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会. “十四五”循环经济发展规划[R]. 2021.
[3] Yoon, D. (2016) Supplier Encroachment and Investment Spillovers. Production and Operations Management, 25, 1839-1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 陈克兵, 王雨琦. 基于政府不同补贴形式下的绿色产品制造商渠道选择策略分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(3): 167-177.
[5] Xu, Y., Tian, Y., Pang, C. and Tang, H. (2024) Manufacturer vs. Retailer: A Comparative Analysis of Different Government Subsidy Strategies in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Green Quality and Channel Preferences. Mathematics, 12, Article 1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 王治莹, 王崔, 楼振凯. 考虑政府补贴与零售商过度自信的双渠道绿色供应链决策[J]. 安徽工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 42(1): 96-107.
[7] Xu, C., Tang, X., Song, J. and Wang, C. (2023) Research on Low-Carbon Dual Channel Supply Chain Considering Product Substitution under Government Carbon Tax and Low-Carbon Subsidy. PLOS ONE, 18, e0287167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Wang, Z. (2023) Recycling Pricing and Government Subsidy Strategy for End-Of-Life Vehicles in a Reverse Supply Chain under Consumer Recycling Channel Preferences. Mathematics, 12, Article 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Lin, X., Zhu, Y., Lin, Z., Li, W. and Lin, Q. (2024) Retailer Information Sharing with Green Manufacturer Encroachment in a Hybrid Supply Chain. International Transactions in Operational Research, 32, 3801-3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Che, C., Chen, Y., Zhang, X. and Zhang, Z. (2021) The Impact of Different Government Subsidy Methods on Low‐carbon Emission Reduction Strategies in Dual‐Channel Supply Chain. Complexity, 2021, Article ID: 6668243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Meng, Q., Li, M., Liu, W., Li, Z. and Zhang, J. (2021) Pricing Policies of Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain: Considering Government Subsidies and Consumers’ Dual Preferences. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 1021-1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Quadir, A. and Raj, A. (2023) Information Sharing in a Green Supply Chain with a Common Retailer. American Business Review, 26, 9.
[13] Cai, J., Sun, H., Shang, J. and Hegde, G.G. (2023) Information Structure Selection in a Green Supply Chain: Impacts of Wholesale Price and Greenness Level. European Journal of Operational Research, 306, 34-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Ma, W., Cheng, Z. and Xu, S. (2018) A Game Theoretic Approach for Improving Environmental and Economic Performance in a Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain. Sustainability, 10, Article 1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Cachon, G.P. and Fisher, M. (2000) Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information. Management Science, 46, 1032-1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Niu, W., Xia, J. and Shen, H. (2022) Decarbonizing Investment in a Supply Chain with Information Asymmetry under Innovation Uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research, 349, 1277-1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 陈羽桃. 企业环保投资效率研究: 度量、影响因素及印象管理[D]: [博士学位论文]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2019.
[18] 张东东, 王汉东. 需求依赖产品绿色度和服务水平的供应链决策与协调[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2017, 6(2): 185-194.
[19] 张江涛, 崔文田. 需求不确定对单周期产品的生产商-零售商供应链的影响[J]. 商业研究, 2005(7): 103-106.