融合批判性思维与课程思政的英语专业精读课教学策略研究
Integrating Critical Thinking with Ideological Education: A Pedagogical Strategy Study for Intensive Reading Courses in English Majors
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2025.15122463, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 帅易琼:重庆移通学院外国语学院,重庆
关键词: 精读课批判性思维课程思政教学策略Intensive Reading Critical Thinking Ideological Education Pedagogical Strategy
摘要: 精读课(综合英语)作为英语专业的核心基础课程,长期以来承载着夯实语言基础与拓展人文视野的功能。然而,当前教学实践中普遍存在“思辨缺席”现象,且课程思政建设常面临“两张皮”的困境,即价值引领与语言教学难以有机融合。本研究旨在探讨如何在英语专业精读课中通过系统的教学策略培养学生的批判性思维能力,并以此为契机实现课程思政的隐性渗透。研究提出了四项核心教学策略:基于苏格拉底式探究的深度阅读、基于批判性话语分析(CDA)的意识形态解构、基于问题导向(PBL)的社会实践应用以及跨文化比较视阈下的价值反思。研究表明,通过将批判性思维的逻辑校验标准与智力特质引入文本分析,教师不仅能有效提升学生的高阶思维能力,还能引导学生理性审视英语国家的话语逻辑,树立文化自信,从而实现从“语言技能训练”向“整全人培养”的转型。
Abstract: The Intensive Reading (Comprehensive English) course, as the core curriculum for English majors, has long borne the responsibility of consolidating linguistic foundations and expanding humanistic horizons. However, current pedagogical practices often suffer from “speculation deficiency” (absence of critical thinking), and the integration of “Curriculum Ideology and Politics” (CIP) frequently encounters the challenge of superficiality, where value guidance and language teaching remain disjointed. This study aims to explore how to cultivate students’ critical thinking skills through systematic pedagogical strategies in English Intensive Reading courses and utilize this as a mechanism for the implicit permeation of ideological education. Four core pedagogical strategies are proposed: deep reading based on Socratic inquiry, ideological deconstruction based on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), social practice application based on Problem-Based Learning (PBL), and value reflection from an intercultural comparative perspective. The study suggests that by introducing the logical validation standards and intellectual traits of critical thinking into textual analysis, teachers can not only effectively enhance students’ higher-order thinking capabilities but also guide them to rationally analyze the thinking patterns of English-speaking nations and establish cultural confidence, thereby realizing the transformation from “language skill training” to “holistic person cultivation”.
文章引用:帅易琼. 融合批判性思维与课程思政的英语专业精读课教学策略研究[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(12): 1666-1674. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2025.15122463

参考文献

[1] 吴岩. 《普通高等学校本科专业类教学质量国家标准》有关情况介绍[J]. 重庆与世界, 2018(4): 48-49.
[2] Shao, Y. and Jiang, H. (2024) Research on Cultivating Critical Thinking in High School English Reading Teaching. English Language Teaching, 17, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 徐美娜. “最近发展区”理论及对教育的影响与启示[J]. 教育与教学研究, 2010, 24(5): 14-16, 23.
[4] Akpan, V.I. and Igwe, U.A. (2020) Social Constructivism: Implications on Teaching and Learning. British Journal of Education, 8, 49-56.
[5] Ralston, P.A., Larson, A.E. and Bays, C.L. (2011) An Assessment of Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Guided by the Paul-Elder Critical Thinking Framework. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26, 25-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 李欣. 布鲁姆教育目标分类学在高阶翻转课堂中的实践探索[J]. 山西青年, 2022(15): 39-41.
[7] 刘建军. 综合实践活动中批判性思维培养的四阶提问策略——以苏格拉底式提问为例[J]. 基础教育课程, 2025(10): 69-75.
[8] 刘柳. 批判性话语分析在英语专业读写结合课程中的应用[J]. 科教文汇(上旬刊), 2020(4): 177-178, 188.
[9] 汪洁. 问题导向式学习法(PBL)在大学英语教学中的应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海外国语大学, 2005.
[10] 贾影. 中西认知差异与跨文化交际的场理论研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2004.
[11] 张豪若, 韩戈玲. 后疫情时代英语专业课程思政研究——以《英语报刊选读》为例[J]. 上海理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 44(3): 253-258.