基于语料库的汉英面状量词翻译策略对比与偏误探析

A Study of Error Analysis and Translation Strategies of Shape Classifiers Based on the Corpus

摘要: 本研究基于SKELL英语语料库，北外语料库语言学Corpora与BCC汉语语料库，系统考察英汉面状量词“张、片、幅”的翻译策略差异及其偏误类型，通过汉英翻译策略对比，发现学习者偏误主要体现为维度属性误判，空间属性混淆及文化语义缺失，其认知根源可追溯至母语类型学差异，例如英语“物体中心”与汉语“维度导向”的冲突，以及文化隐喻能力不足。本文分为五个部分，第一章引言，包括研究意义以及选题背景。第二章研究现状，包括理论基础和文献综述，对本文选取的三个量词进行本意溯源，探究其语义发展演变过程。第三章研究设计，基于语料库进行收集整理，提出研究问题。第四章结果与讨论，进行偏误分析和对比分析，回答了英汉面状量词的系统性差异，以及产生的偏误类型的问题，与其他学者的研究结果进行对比，对结果分析讨论。第五章结语，总结本文的研究成果与不足之处。

Abstract: This study is based on the SKELL English corpus, the North Foreign Language Corpus, and the Corpora and BCC Chinese corpora. It systematically examines the translation strategies and error types of the Chinese and English surface quantifiers “zhang,” “pian,” and “fu.” Through a comparison of Chinese-English translation strategies, it is found that learners errors mainly manifest as dimensional attribute misjudgment, spatial attribute confusion, and cultural semantic loss. The cognitive roots of these errors can be traced back to typological differences in native languages and insufficient cultural metaphorical ability. This paper is divided into five parts: Chapter 1 Introduction, including the significance of the research and the background of the topic. Chapter 2 Research Status, including theoretical foundations and literature reviews, tracing the original meanings of the three quantifiers selected for this study and exploring their semantic development and evolution. Chapter 3 Research Design, collecting and organizing data from the corpora, and posing research questions. Chapter 4 Results and Discussion, conducting error analysis and comparative analysis to address the systematic differences in surface quantifiers between English and Chinese, as well as the types of errors produced, and comparing these results with those of other scholars. Chapter 5 Conclusion, summarizing the findings and shortcomings of this study.