基于粒子群算法的主动悬架模型预测控制研究
Research on Model Predictive Control of Active Suspension Based on Particle Swarm Algorithm
摘要: 针对汽车主动悬架系统在复杂路况下的多目标协同优化问题,本文提出了一种基于粒子群优化算法(Particle Swarm Optimization, PSO)的模型预测控制(Model Predictive Control, MPC)策略。首先,通过创建四分之一车辆主动悬架系统的动力学模型,以车身垂直加速度为主要控制目标,同时统筹悬架动行程、轮胎动位移及执行器约束;其次,设计PSO-MPC控制器,通过PSO算法全局优化MPC的权重矩阵,克服传统MPC参数依赖人工调节的局限性;最后,对比分析线性二次调节器(Linear Quadratic Regulator, LQR)、传统MPC、PSO-MPC及被动悬架的性能指标。仿真结果表明,相比被动悬架系统,在随机路面和凸块路面激励下,PSO-MPC使车身垂直加速度的均方根(Root Mean Square, RMS)值分别降低了49.99%和72.22%,悬架动行程的RMS值分别减少24.23%和32.86%,轮胎动位移的RMS值分别下降32.49%和69.53%。这些结果验证了所提出的控制方法在同时提升车辆行驶安全性、乘坐舒适性及操纵稳定性方面的综合优势。
Abstract: To address the multi-objective collaborative optimization problem of automotive active suspension systems under complex road conditions, this paper proposes a model predictive control (MPC) strategy based on the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. First, a dynamic model of the quarter vehicle active suspension system is created, with body vertical acceleration as the primary control objective, while simultaneously considering suspension dynamic travel, tire dynamic displacement, and actuator constraints; Second, a PSO-MPC controller is designed, where the PSO algorithm globally optimizes the weight matrix of the MPC, overcoming the limitation of traditional MPC where parameters rely on manual adjustment; finally, the performance metrics of the linear quadratic regulator (LQR), traditional MPC, PSO-MPC, and passive suspension systems are compared and analyzed. Simulation results show that compared to the passive suspension system, under random road surface and bumpy road surface excitations, the PSO-MPC reduces the root mean square (RMS) value of body vertical acceleration decreased by 49.99% and 72.22%, respectively, the RMS value of suspension dynamic travel by 24.23% and 32.86%, respectively, and the RMS values of tire dynamic displacement decreased by 32.49% and 69.53%, respectively. These results validate the comprehensive advantages of the proposed control method in simultaneously enhancing vehicle driving safety, ride comfort, and maneuvering stability.
文章引用:李广龙, 翁发禄, 魏童俊, 杨晶晶, 许锦杰. 基于粒子群算法的主动悬架模型预测控制研究[J]. 传感器技术与应用, 2026, 14(1): 66-80. https://doi.org/10.12677/jsta.2026.141007

参考文献

[1] 寇发荣, 武江浩, 许家楠, 等. 整车电磁混合主动悬架故障诊断与容错控制研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(4): 101-109.
[2] Soliman, A. and Kaldas, M. (2019) Semi-Active Suspension Systems from Research to Mass-Market—A Review. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 40, 1005-1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Theunissen, J., Tota, A., Gruber, P., Dhaens, M. and Sorniotti, A. (2021) Preview-Based Techniques for Vehicle Suspension Control: A State-of-the-Art Review. Annual Reviews in Control, 51, 206-235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Rana, R.S. and Adhyaru, D.M. (2023) Two-Degree of Freedom-Based Control Model for Active Suspension System to Mitigate the Nonlinear Disturbance. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 32, Article ID: 2350312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 丁芳, 王波, 刘明岩. 汽车主动悬架LQR控制研究[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2020, 36(4): 52-56.
[6] 翁发禄, 耿飞跃, 丁元春. 基于线性矩阵不等式的纯时滞系统稳定性分析与控制器设计[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(31): 12872-12877.
[7] 寇发荣, 陈奕晓, 张新乾, 等. 基于路面激励预瞄范围切换的主动悬架滑模控制[J]. 振动与冲击, 2024, 43(13): 237-247.
[8] 薛文平, 张春玲. 基于遗传算法的汽车主动悬架变论域模糊PID控制[J]. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 45(1): 8-15.
[9] 郭勇, 张子健. 高速重载车辆主动油气悬架系统平顺性控制发展综述[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(12): 4675-4686.
[10] 李兰崧, 罗建南, 殷珺, 等. 轮毂电机驱动汽车主动悬架模型预测控制器设计[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2023, 39(3): 180-184, 192.
[11] 白国星, 孟宇, 刘立, 等. 无人驾驶车辆路径跟踪控制研究现状[J]. 工程科学学报, 2021, 43(4): 475-485.
[12] 孙船斌, 邓书朝, 殷国栋. 极限工况车辆非线性模糊MPC控制[J]. 振动与冲击, 2023, 42(13): 25-35, 65.
[13] Yang, T., Li, P., Li, Q. and Li, Z. (2024) Active Suspension Control Strategy for Vehicles Based on Road Surface Recognition. Nonlinear Dynamics, 112, 11043-11065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 王习昌, 鲍东杰. 改进粒子群算法在LQR半主动悬架的应用[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2023, 42(3): 468-474.
[15] Sun, W.C., Zhao, Y., Li, J.F., Zhang, L.X. and Gao, H.J. (2012) Active Suspension Control with Frequency Band Constraints and Actuator Input Delay. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 59, 530-537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 王鹏飞, 杜忠华, 马祥, 等. 车辆主动悬架二次型最优控制器权矩阵参数优化[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(13): 5383-5389.
[17] Liu, Q., Hu, B., Liu, W., Li, J., Yu, W., Li, G., et al. (2024) A Fractional-Order Model Predictive Control Strategy with Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Optimization for Vehicle Active Suspension System. Fractal and Fractional, 8, Article 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Kim, J., Lee, T., Kim, C. and Yi, K. (2023) Model Predictive Control of a Semi-Active Suspension with a Shift Delay Compensation Using Preview Road Information. Control Engineering Practice, 137, Article ID: 105584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 孙凤, 邢大壮, 周冉, 等. 考虑能耗的电磁主动悬架LQR控制策略[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2023, 58(4): 754-760, 798.
[20] 詹长书, 苏立庆. 基于粒子群优化的主动悬架PID控制策略[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(10): 4180-4186.
[21] Jin, X., Wang, J., He, X., Yan, Z., Xu, L., Wei, C., et al. (2023) Improving Vibration Performance of Electric Vehicles Based on In-Wheel Motor-Active Suspension System via Robust Finite Frequency Control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24, 1631-1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 郑晓园, 张皓, 王祝萍, 等. 具有执行器容错的汽车主动悬架系统有限频率H控制[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2017, 34(9): 1136-1142.
[23] 罗继博. 马尔科夫型随机主动悬架系统故障估计与容错控制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2023.