融合InVEST碳汇的步道多点网络路径规划:生态约束与视觉优化协同
Multi-Point Network Path Planning for Trails Integrating InVEST Carbon Sinks: Synergy between Ecological Constraints and Visual Optimization
DOI: 10.12677/gst.2026.141001, PDF,   
作者: 何梓润:云南大学国际河流与生态保护研究院,云南 昆明
关键词: InVEST碳储量XGBoost路径规划景观评价帕累托优化InVEST Carbon Storage XGBoost Route Planning Landscape Evaluation Pareto Optimization
摘要: 为解决传统登山健身步道规划中生态保护维度缺失、单一路径规划效率低及未兼顾安全–生态–景观协同的问题,实现步道建设对自然生态系统的最小化干扰,同时满足步道使用需求,本研究以植被生态保护与地形耦合为核心开展路径规划。研究构建“安全–生态–景观”三维选线评价体系并采用多方法协同。地形坡度方面,将坡度大于50 (不符合国标)设为硬约束,符合国标的坡度标准化;安全因子层面,结合历史滑坡样本,用XGBoost模型量化滑坡风险,以贝叶斯优化超参数,通过SHAP值确定权重;生态因子层面,基于InVEST-Carbon模块核算碳储量损失,修正不同土地利用碳密度计算损失栅格面;通过熵权法确定指标权重,采用多起点–多中途点–多终点网络化最小成本路径规划,以景观因子VM结合帕累托非劣解综合筛选路径。本研究提出的网络化规划模式与多因子耦合方法,可有效平衡生态保护,维持碳汇功能、安全保障与景观体验,解决传统规划缺陷,为登山健身步道低干扰路径带规划提供科学支撑。
Abstract: To address the lack of ecological conservation considerations, inefficient single-path planning, and the failure to integrate safety, ecology, and landscape in traditional mountain fitness trail design, this study focuses on path planning that minimizes disturbance to natural ecosystems while meeting trail usage demands. It centers on the coupling of vegetation ecology conservation and topography. A three-dimensional route evaluation system integrating safety, ecology, and landscape was established, employing a multi-method approach. Regarding terrain slope, gradients exceeding 50 degrees (non-compliant with national standards) were set as hard constraints, while compliant slopes were standardized. For safety factors, a XGBoost model quantifies landslide risk using 175 positive and 175 negative landslide samples, with Bayesian optimization for hyperparameters and SHAP values determining weights. For ecological factors, carbon stock loss was calculated using the InVEST-Carbon module, and loss grids were adjusted based on carbon density calculations for different land uses. Indicator weights were determined via the entropy weight method. Multi-origin-multi-intermediate-multi-destination networked minimum-cost path planning was employed, with paths comprehensively screened using the VM landscape factor combined with Pareto non-dominated solutions. The proposed networked planning model and multi-factor coupling method effectively balance ecological conservation, carbon sink functionality, safety assurance, and landscape experience. This approach addresses limitations of traditional planning and provides scientific support for designing low-impact pathway corridors for mountain fitness trails.
文章引用:何梓润. 融合InVEST碳汇的步道多点网络路径规划:生态约束与视觉优化协同[J]. 测绘科学技术, 2026, 14(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.12677/gst.2026.141001

参考文献

[1] 张冠娉, 吴越. 基于GIS的鹅形山森林公园游步道选线系统的建立[J]. 中外建筑, 2012(5): 111-113.
[2] 左国良, 胡海辉. 基于数字技术的森林公园游步道选线研究[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 46(1): 168-175.
[3] Sitzia, T., Rizzi, A., Cattaneo, D. and Semenzato, P. (2014) Designing Recreational Trails in a Forest Dune Habitat Using Least-Cost Path Analysis at the Resolution of Visitor Sight Distance. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13, 861-868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Chiou, C., Tsai, W. and Leung, Y. (2010) A GIS-Dynamic Segmentation Approach to Planning Travel Routes on Forest Trail Networks in Central Taiwan Region. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 221-228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T44090-2024登山健身步道配置要求[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2024.
[6] Raso, E., Cevasco, A., Di Martire, D., Pepe, G., Scarpellini, P., Calcaterra, D., et al. (2019) Landslide-inventory of the Cinque Terre National Park (Italy) and Quantitative Interaction with the Trail Network. Journal of Maps, 15, 818-830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Marion, J.L. and Wimpey, J. (2017) Assessing the Influence of Sustainable Trail Design and Maintenance on Soil Loss. Journal of Environmental Management, 189, 46-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Tešić, D., Đorđević, J., Hölbling, D., Đorđević, T., Blagojević, D., Tomić, N., et al. (2020) Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using AHP and GIS Weighted Overlay Method: A Case Study from Ljig, Serbia. Serbian Journal of Geosciences, 6, 9-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 陈国平, 赵俊三, 魏保峰. DEM技术在景观工程道路选线中的应用[J]. 测绘工程, 2007(3): 59-62.
[10] Kissling, M., Hegetschweiler, K.T., Rusterholz, H. and Baur, B. (2009) Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Human Trampling on Above-Ground Vegetation, Soil Density, Soil Organic Matter and Soil Microbial Processes in Suburban Beech Forests. Applied Soil Ecology, 42, 303-314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 杨洁, 谢保鹏, 张德罡. 基于InVEST和CA-Markov模型的黄河流域碳储量时空变化研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(6): 1018-1029.
[12] Ballantyne, M. and Pickering, C.M. (2015) The Impacts of Trail Infrastructure on Vegetation and Soils: Current Literature and Future Directions. Journal of Environmental Management, 164, 53-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 陈光水, 杨玉盛, 刘乐中, 等. 森林地下碳分配(TBCA)研究进展[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2007(1): 34-42.
[14] Alam, S.A., Starr, M. and Clark, B.J.F. (2013) Tree Biomass and Soil Organic Carbon Densities across the Sudanese Woodland Savannah: A Regional Carbon Sequestration Study. Journal of Arid Environments, 89, 67-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Giardina, C.P. and Ryan, M.G. (2000) Evidence That Decomposition Rates of Organic Carbon in Mineral Soil Do Not Vary with Temperature. Nature, 404, 858-861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Brochu, E., Cora, V.M. and de Freitas, N. (2010) A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization of Expensive Cost Functions, with Application to Active User Modeling and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning. arXiv: 1012.2599.
[17] Snoek, J., Larochelle, H. and Adams, R.P. (2012) Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms. arXiv: 1206.2944.
[18] Chamberlain, B.C. and Meitner, M.J. (2013) A Route-Based Visibility Analysis for Landscape Management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 111, 13-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef