“AI陪伴”现象的形成逻辑、情感形塑与应对策略
The Formation Logic, Emotional Shaping, and Coping Strategies of the AI Companion Phenomenon
摘要: 伴随生成式人工智能技术的突破性发展,“AI陪伴”作为一种新型的情感实践与关系形态,在青年群体中迅速兴起并融入其日常生活。本研究系统探究“AI陪伴”现象的形成逻辑及其对青年情感构建的复杂影响。研究发现,“AI陪伴”现象根植于现代社会的结构性疏离、数字媒介的技术可供性,以及青年主动寻求低风险情感策略的三重逻辑。本文进一步揭示,“AI陪伴”在提供高度可控、即时响应与个性化情感支持的同时,亦可能重塑青年对亲密关系的认知与期待,并对人际交往能力与社会性发展构成潜在挑战。因此,本文从政策、企业和个人三个层面提出应对策略与思考。
Abstract: With the breakthrough development of generative artificial intelligence technology, “AI companionship”, as a new type of emotional practice and relational form, has rapidly emerged among young people and integrated into their daily lives. This study aims to systematically explore the formation logic of the “AI companionship” phenomenon and its complex impacts on young people’s emotional construction. The findings reveal that the “AI companionship” phenomenon is rooted in the triple logics of structural alienation in modern society, the technological affordances of digital media, and young people’s active pursuit of low-risk emotional strategies. The paper further demonstrates that while AI companionship provides highly controllable, instant-response and personalized emotional support, it may also reshape young people’s cognition and expectations of intimate relationships, and pose potential challenges to their interpersonal communication abilities and social development. Therefore, this paper puts forward coping strategies and reflections from three levels: policy, enterprise and individual.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Soul研究院. 2025Z世代AI使用报告[EB/OL]. 2025-03-31. https://official-cdn.soulapp.cn/uploads/_5ef0e3ef06.pdf, 2025-10-11.
|
|
[2]
|
Nass, C. and Moon, Y. (2000) Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 81-103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1996) The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Center for the Study of Language and Information, 19-36.
|
|
[4]
|
van der Goot, M. and Etzrod, K. (2023) Disentangling Two Fundamental Paradigms in Human-Machine Communication Research: Media Equation and Media Evocation. Human-Machine Communication, 6, 17-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
彭兰. “镜子”与“他者”: 智能机器与人类关系之考辨[J]. 新闻大学, 2024(3): 18-32, 117-118.
|
|
[6]
|
段俊吉. 理解“社恐”: 青年交往方式的文化阐释[J]. 中国青年研究, 2023(5): 95-102.
|
|
[7]
|
何秋红, 刘肖琦. 社交媒体时代青年群体“电话焦虑”影响因素探析[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 44(1): 152-159.
|
|
[8]
|
成倩. 聚而不群: 社交媒体时代青年“孤独社交”的现象透视与形成逻辑[J]. 当代青年研究, 2023(5): 74-84.
|
|
[9]
|
博克, P.K. 多元文化与社会进步[M]. 余兴安, 等, 译. 沈阳: 辽宁人民出版社, 1988: 148-149.
|
|
[10]
|
邢海燕, 邸涵. 大城市独居青年的时空边界重塑[J]. 青年探索, 2022(6): 62-73.
|
|
[11]
|
刘珍. “与机器谈情”: 可供性视角下的人机情绪传播[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(4): 89-98, 172.
|
|
[12]
|
雪莉∙特克尔. 群体性孤独[M]. 周逵, 刘菁荆, 译. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 2014.
|
|
[13]
|
新华网. 通过AI, 这些年轻人与自己“和解” [EB/OL]. 2025-10-27. http://www.news.cn/tech/20251027/d7c6c566be8f447b9db651f1b734a0bf/c.html, 2025-11-09.
|
|
[14]
|
Glickman, M. and Sharot, T. (2024) How Human-AI Feedback Loops Alter Human Perceptual, Emotional and Social Judgements. Nature Human Behaviour, 9, 345-359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[15]
|
张仟煜. 专家学者探讨——如何引导青少年合理使用AI [EB/OL]. 2025-12-10. https://news.youth.cn/gn/202512/t20251210_16398130.htm, 2025-12-12.
|