“双减”政策下家校共育的研究
Research on Home-School Co-Education under the “Double Reduction” Policy
摘要: 学校教育和良好的家庭的教育是使学生健康发展的必要条件,因此学校和家庭都要履行义务、承担责任,这就要家校双方携手合作,达到共育目标。然而在“双减”政策实行之际,国家明确提出对学生们减负的要求,家校共育面临着巨大的挑战。为了实现高效合作共育,本文探讨在“双减”政策下的家校共育的调查研究。通过问卷调查的方法收集并分析数据,以及定量研究,发现以“双减”政策为背景下的家校共育中存在的某些弊端或问题,探索出使得家校高效合作共育的策略及建议,通过家校共育创新探索教育方法,提高教育品质,共同培育出德智体美劳全面发展的新型人才,从而实现“双减”政策的目标品质价值,从真正意义上为学生们减负。
Abstract: School education and supportive family education are both fundamental prerequisites for the holistic development of students. Consequently, schools and families must jointly undertake their respective responsibilities and collaborate closely to achieve the shared educational objectives. However, the implementation of the “double reduction” policy, which emphasizes reducing excessive academic burdens on students. Presents significant challenges to effective home-school collaboration. In order to enhance the effectiveness of such cooperation, this study conducts an empirical investigation into home-school co-education under the “double reduction” policy framework. Through questionnaire surveys and quantitative analysis, the research identifies existing issues and shortcomings in current home-school collaborative practices. Furthermore, it proposes strategic recommendations to optimize the partnership between families and schools. By innovating educational methods through deepened collaboration, improving overall educational quality, and jointly cultivating well-rounded individuals with moral, intellectual, physical, aesthetic, and labor competencies, this study aims to realize the fundamental goals of the “double reduction” policy, thereby authentically alleviating academic pressure on students and facilitating their healthy development.
文章引用:常渺, 谭希丽. “双减”政策下家校共育的研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(1): 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.161020

参考文献

[1] Henderson, A.T. and Mapp, K.L. (2002) A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family and Community Connections on Student Achievement. SEDL Archive.
[2] Aikens, N.L. and Barbarin, O. (2008) Socioeconomic Differences in Reading Trajectories: The Contribution of Family, Neighborhood, and School Contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 235-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Ansari, A. and Gershoff, E. (2015) Parent Involvement in Head Start and Children’s Development: Indirect Effects through Parenting. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 562-579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Boonk, L., Gijselaers, H.J.M., Ritzen, H. and Brand-Gruwel, S. (2018) A Review of the Relationship between Parental Involvement Indicators and Academic Achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 10-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Naveed, M.N., Shaheen, S. and Javed, M.B. (2019) The Impact of Parental Involvement on Children’s Education in Primary Level at District Vehari. International Journal of Learning and Development, 9, 134-125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 黄河清, 马恒懿. 家校合作价值论新探[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2011, 29(4): 23-29.
[7] 吴重涵, 王梅雾, 张俊. 教育跨界行动的制度化特征——对家校合作的经验分析[J]. 教育研究, 2017, 38(11): 81-90.
[8] 郝晓芳, 薛枝梅. 网络环境下小学生家校协同教育研究[J]. 办公自动化, 2019, 24(1): 31-33+62.
[9] 卢鸿鸣. 家校高度融合形成教育合力——以长郡中学为例[J]. 当代教育论坛, 2012(4): 123-126.
[10] 刘莹, 苑廷刚, 敬龙军. “双减”政策下促进青少年体质健康发展机遇、挑战与路径[J]. 体育文化导刊, 2022(4): 53-59.
[11] 傅国亮. 新时代家校共育的再认识[J]. 中华家教, 2021(1): 31-36.
[12] 韩姝. 家校共育的现状及其优化策略[J]. 公关世界, 2021(11): 123-124.
[13] 单志艳. 家校共育的权责边界[J]. 北京教育学院学报, 2020, 34(6): 1-8.
[14] 钟晓龙. 双减政策下家校合作的核心意蕴[J]. 文渊(中学版), 2021(6): 1403-1404.
[15] 乔永强. 家校沟通过程中的问题与对策[J]. 国家通用语言文字教学与研究, 2021(7): 158-159.
[16] 邓礼伦. 解读双减政策 家校双向发力[J]. 百科论坛电子杂志, 2021(24): 1066.
[17] 付卫东, 刘慧敏, 陈安妮. 教育新基建助力“双减”政策落地: 需求、优势与挑战[J]. 现代教育技术, 2022, 32(1): 27-34.