沿海碱性农田土壤pH、重金属分布及污染分析
Analysis of Soil pH, Heavy Metal Distribution and Pollution in Coastal Alkaline Farmland
DOI: 10.12677/hjss.2026.141001, PDF,   
作者: 夏沪彬:上海建工环境科技有限公司,上海;上海申环环境工程有限公司,上海
关键词: pH重金属污染分析pH Heavy Metals Pollution Analysis
摘要: 对上海市沿海某地块农田土壤中pH、As、Cd、Cu、Pb、Hg、Ni的分布及污染特征进行研究。结果表明,土壤pH值范围为8.36~9.89,偏碱性,As、Cd、Cu、Hg和Ni 5项重金属最大浓度高于国家和上海的土壤背景值,Pb最大浓度和平均浓度均低于国家和上海市土壤背景值。重金属变异系数Hg > As > Cu > Cd > Pb = Ni。以国家土壤背景值为基准时,Cd、Cu、Ni、Hg呈现污染;以上海市土壤背景值为基准时,As、Cu、Hg呈现污染;以GB 15618-2018的风险筛选值为基准时,土壤的环境质量为清洁。pH与Cd、Cu、As、Ni、Pb等5种重金属存在显著负相关性,Cd、Cu、As、Ni、Pb重金属间存在显著正相关性,且同源性较强,Cu-Cd相关性系数最高(0.81)。Hg与大部分重金属不存在相关性,Hg受人为源影响比较大。
Abstract: The distribution and pollution characteristics of pH, As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Hg and Ni in the farmland soil of a coastal area in Shanghai were studied. The results showed that the pH value of the soil ranged from 8.36 to 9.89, which was slightly alkaline. The maximum concentrations of As, Cd, Cu, Hg and Ni exceeded the national and Shanghai soil background values. The maximum and average concentrations of Pb were lower than the national and Shanghai soil background values. The coefficient of variation of heavy metals followed the order: Hg > As > Cu > Cd > Pb = Ni. When the national soil background value was used as the benchmark, Cd, Cu, Ni and Hg were polluted. When the Shanghai soil background value was used as the benchmark, As, Cu and Hg were polluted; when the risk screening value of GB 15618-2018 was used as the benchmark, the soil environmental quality was found to be clean. pH was significantly negatively correlated with the five heavy metals of Cd, Cu, As, Ni and Pb, and there was a significant positive correlation among Cd, Cu, As, Ni and Pb, with strong homology. The correlation coefficient between Cu and Cd was the highest (0.81). Hg showed no significant correlation with most of the heavy metals, indicating that Hg was more strongly influenced by anthropogenic sources.
文章引用:夏沪彬. 沿海碱性农田土壤pH、重金属分布及污染分析[J]. 土壤科学, 2026, 14(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjss.2026.141001

参考文献

[1] Mai, X., Tang, J., Tang, J., Zhu, X., Yang, Z., Liu, X., et al. (2025) Research Progress on the Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation Technologies of Heavy Metal Pollution in Agricultural Soil. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 149, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Nde, S.C., Felicite, O.M., Aruwajoye, G.S. and Palamuleni, L.G. (2024) A Meta-Analysis and Experimental Survey of Heavy Metals Pollution in Agricultural Soils. Journal of Trace Elements and Minerals, 9, Article 100180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 张璐莹, 于洋, 郑玉婷, 等. 发达国家金属环境风险评估方法研究[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(1): 350-357.
[4] 张雨涵, 李瑜, 官开江, 等. 重庆某农业集中区土壤重金属污染评价与来源解析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(7): 10-18.
[5] 李文明, 孙朝, 陈霄燕, 等. 青海省典型高山农业区域土壤重金属污染评价及来源探析[J]. 岩矿测试, 2023, 42(3): 598-615.
[6] 李超, 戴雪荣. 上海城市地貌形变的生态环境效应及应对策略[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(S1): 81-86.
[7] 王彤, 封超年, 靳瑞萍, 等. 苏北滨海盐碱土壤盐碱化特征[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(19): 339-343.
[8] 凌玲. 上海临港新城道路土壤特征及改良对策[J]. 上海建设科技, 2018(4): 88-90.
[9] 窦韦强, 安毅, 秦莉, 等. 农田土壤重金属垂直分布迁移特征及生态风险评价[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(2): 166-172.
[10] 张施阳. 基于GIS的上海市不同功能区土壤重金属污染评价及健康风险评估[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(4): 1226-1236.
[11] 李仁声, 花修艺, 董德明, 等. 由pH值改变引起的水环境多种固相物质共存体系中重金属的再分布行为[J]. 吉林大学学报(理学版), 2009, 47(4): 852-858.
[12] 余涛, 杨忠芳, 钟坚, 等. 土壤中重金属元素Pb、Cd地球化学行为影响因素研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(5): 67-73.
[13] 陈锐, 杜双杰, 徐伟, 等. 南京城郊某典型退耕农用地土壤重金属含量特征与污染评价分析[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(3): 102-110.
[14] 李晓敏, 严俊霞, 杜自强, 等. 太原市蔬菜中重金属污染特征及健康风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(2): 327-336.
[15] 滕吉艳. 上海城市中心区不同类型绿地土壤重金属污染特征[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(4): 927-933.