一个边疆牧区蒙汉互嵌社区的文化交融研究——以内蒙古那仁宝拉格苏木为例
A Study on Cultural Integration in a Mongolian-Han Interwoven Community in a Frontier Pastoral Area—Taking Naren Baolag Sumu, Inner Mongolia as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/jc.2026.141018, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 包黎萍, 麦拉苏:内蒙古师范大学民族学人类学学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 边疆牧区蒙汉互嵌社区文化交融研究Frontier Pastoral Areas Mongolian-Han Interwoven Communities Cultural Integration Studies
摘要: 本文从互嵌社区视域出发,深入探讨蒙汉民族从文化视角在语言、民俗、饮食、服饰、教育及婚姻等六个维度的互嵌现象与成效。探索这种社区的文化交融现象,挖掘交融现象成因、现状与意义,大力推进各族人民之间的文化交流与融合。通过蒙汉民族间文化互嵌实例分析,蒙汉语言的交流兼用、民俗的共同参与、饮食的相互接纳、服饰的彼此借用、教育的双语实践、婚姻的普遍通婚等,推动各民族文化资本有效性互嵌,促进社会认同从而优化社会结构,有利于社会经济各项事业的发展。为互嵌理论的研究提供了丰富的案例和理论支撑,对于促进多民族地区的民族团结与社会和谐具有重要意义。
Abstract: This paper examines the phenomenon of cultural interweaving between the Mongolian and Han ethnic groups from a community perspective, delving into its manifestations and outcomes across six dimensions: language, customs, cuisine, attire, education, and marriage. By exploring this cultural fusion within communities, it investigates the causes, current state, and significance of such integration, thereby vigorously promoting cultural exchange and cohesion among all ethnic groups. Through case studies of cultural interpenetration between Mongolian and Han communities—including the shared use of languages, joint participation in folk customs, mutual acceptance of dietary practices, borrowing of traditional attire, bilingual educational practices, and widespread intermarriage—this research demonstrates how effective cultural capital interpenetration fosters social recognition, optimizes social structures, and facilitates socioeconomic development. This research provides rich case studies and theoretical support for interpenetration theory, holding significant implications for promoting ethnic unity and social harmony in multi-ethnic regions.
文章引用:包黎萍, 麦拉苏. 一个边疆牧区蒙汉互嵌社区的文化交融研究——以内蒙古那仁宝拉格苏木为例[J]. 新闻传播科学, 2026, 14(1): 144-149. https://doi.org/10.12677/jc.2026.141018

参考文献

[1] 高文勇, 尹奎杰. 民族互嵌社区精准治理的理论向度与实践路径——以贵州省兴义市S街道社区为例[J]. 北方民族大学学报, 2021(2): 47-56.
[2] Naroll, R., Berndt, R.M., Bessac, F.D., Chapple, E.D., Dole, G.E., Driver, H.E., et al. (1964) On Ethnic Unit Classification [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology, 5, 283-312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 迈尔威利∙斯图沃德. 当代西方宗教哲学[M]. 周伟驰, 胡自信, 吴增定, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2001: 96-93.
[4] Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. and Holm, U. (2002) The Strategic Impact of External Networks: Subsidiary Performance and Competence Development in the Multinational Corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 979-996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 亓媛. 互嵌式社区文化适应状况研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古工业大学, 2021.
[6] 姜林林. 文化认同视域下构建互嵌式民族关系的路径研究[J]. 社会与公益, 2025(17): 108-110.
[7] 邢亮, 李林. 互嵌式社区民族工作高质量发展的内在机理与实践进路[J]. 中国成人教育, 2025(19): 47-56.
[8] 张志远. 边疆多民族社区“嵌入式”机理与治理路径[J]. 四川行政学院学报, 2023(2): 36-48, 102.
[9] 谢晓洁, 谭政, 颜晓飞. 西南边疆多民族互嵌社区多元主体协同共治困境的实证分析与路径优化[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2025, 19(5): 82-89.
[10] 李琼. 云南边疆民族地区构建互嵌式社会结构和社区环境探析[N]. 山西科技报, 2025-09-23(B06).
[11] 乌云格日勒. 阿巴嘎故土-那仁宝拉格苏木[M]. 通辽: 内蒙古少年儿童出版社, 2020: 5-9.
[12] 薄辉龙, 徐君. 空间建构视域下吉隆口岸社会结构与社会治理[J]. 西藏大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 37(1): 214-222.