多普勒鼻烟窝桡动脉阻力指数在脓毒症及感染性休克患者中的应用价值
Application Value of Doppler Sunff-Box Resistive Index in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.161052, PDF,   
作者: 张晓娜, 李 哲, 纪明燕:承德医学院研究生学院,河北 承德;邯郸市中心医院重症医学科,河北 邯郸;王景梅*:邯郸市中心医院重症医学科,河北 邯郸
关键词: 脓毒症感染性休克多普勒超声多普勒鼻烟窝桡动脉阻力指数微循环预后Sepsis Septic Shock Doppler Ultrasound Doppler Sunff-Box Resietive Index Microcirculation Prognosis
摘要: 脓毒症是指因感染引起的宿主反应失调导致的危及生命的器官功能障碍。感染性休克是脓毒症经过充分的液体复苏,仍需使用血管活性药物以维持平均动脉压 ≥ 65 mmHg,且血乳酸浓度 > 2 mmol/L。脓毒症的病理生理核心是微循环功能障碍与血流分布异常。传统宏观血流动力学参数,如平均动脉压、中心静脉压等往往无法准确反映脓毒症患者组织灌注的真实状态。虽然肾动脉阻力指数(Renal Resistive Index, RRI)已被广泛研究作为全身微循环障碍的替代指标,但其测量受多种因素干扰,临床上并不易得。鼻烟窝处的桡动脉位置表浅、易于探测,且远离中心循环,可能比传统宏观血流动力学参数及RRI等指标更能反映外周血管的收缩状态。本研究旨在系统综述多普勒超声测量鼻烟窝桡动脉阻力指数(Doppler Sunff-Box Resistive Index, SBRI)在评估脓毒症及感染性休克患者病情严重程度、预后预测及指导治疗中的临床应用价值。
Abstract: Sepsis refers to life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by dysregulation of the host’s response due to infection. Septic shock is defined as a condition where, after adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressor drugs are still required to maintain an average arterial pressure of ≥65 mmHg and a blood lactate concentration of >2 mmol/L. The core pathophysiology of sepsis is microcirculation dysfunction and abnormal blood flow distribution. Traditional macroscopic hemodynamic parameters, such as mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure, often fail to accurately reflect the true state of tissue perfusion in sepsis patients. Although Renal Resistive Index (RRI) has been widely studied as an alternative indicator for systemic microcirculation disorders, its measurement is often interfered by various factors and is not easily obtainable in clinical practice. The radial artery position at the naso-gingival area is superficial, easy to detect, and far from the central circulation, and may be more capable of reflecting the contraction state of peripheral blood vessels than traditional macroscopic hemodynamic parameters and RRI and other indicators. This study aims to systematically review the clinical application value of Doppler ultrasound measurement of Doppler Sunff-box Resistive Index (SBRI) in evaluating the severity of sepsis and septic shock patients, predicting prognosis, and guiding treatment.
文章引用:张晓娜, 李哲, 纪明燕, 王景梅. 多普勒鼻烟窝桡动脉阻力指数在脓毒症及感染性休克患者中的应用价值[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(1): 365-373. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.161052

参考文献

[1] Singer, M., Deutschman, C.S., Seymour, C.W., Shankar-Hari, M., Annane, D., Bauer, M., et al. (2016) The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315, 801-810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C.M., French, C., et al. (2021) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Critical Care Medicine, 49, e1063-e1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Rudd, K.E., Johnson, S.C., Agesa, K.M., Shackelford, K.A., Tsoi, D., Kievlan, D.R., et al. (2020) Global, Regional, and National Sepsis Incidence and Mortality, 1990-2017: Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet, 395, 200-211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] De Backer, D., Orbegozo Cortes, D., Donadello, K. and Vincent, J. (2013) Pathophysiology of Microcirculatory Dysfunction and the Pathogenesis of Septic Shock. Virulence, 5, 73-79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Ince, C., Mayeux, P.R., Nguyen, T., Gomez, H., Kellum, J.A., Ospina-Tascón, G.A., et al. (2016) The Endothelium in Sepsis. Shock, 45, 259-270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] De Backer, D., Creteur, J., Preiser, J., Dubois, M. and Vincent, J. (2002) Microvascular Blood Flow Is Altered in Patients with Sepsis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 166, 98-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Sakr, Y., Dubois, M., De Backer, D., Creteur, J. and Vincent, J. (2004) Persistent Microcirculatory Alterations Are Associated with Organ Failure and Death in Patients with Septic Shock. Critical Care Medicine, 32, 1825-1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Darmon, M., Schortgen, F., Vargas, F., Liazydi, A., Schlemmer, B., Brun-Buisson, C., et al. (2010) Diagnostic Accuracy of Doppler Renal Resistive Index for Reversibility of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients. Intensive Care Medicine, 37, 68-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Villa, G., Husain-Syed, F., Saitta, T., Degl’Innocenti, D., Barbani, F., Resta, M., et al. (2021) Hemodynamic Instability during Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Renal Replacement Therapy: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications. Blood Purification, 50, 729-739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Anile, A., Ferrario, S., Campanello, L., Orban, M.A. and Castiglione, G. (2019) Renal Resistive Index: A New Reversible Tool for the Early Diagnosis and Evaluation of Organ Perfusion in Critically Ill Patients: A Case Report. The Ultrasound Journal, 11, Article No. 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Lee, E., Hsia, S., Huang, C., Kao, K., Chan, O., Lin, C., et al. (2019) Strong Correlation between Doppler Snuffbox Resistive Index and Systemic Vascular Resistance in Septic Patients. Journal of Critical Care, 49, 45-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Trzeciak, S., McCoy, J.V., Phillip Dellinger, R., Arnold, R.C., Rizzuto, M., Abate, N.L., et al. (2008) Early Increases in Microcirculatory Perfusion during Protocol-Directed Resuscitation Are Associated with Reduced Multi-Organ Failure at 24 H in Patients with Sepsis. Intensive Care Medicine, 34, 2210-2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Piagnerelli, M., Boudjeltia, K.Z., Vanhaeverbeek, M. and Vincent, J. (2003) Red Blood Cell Rheology in Sepsis. Intensive Care Medicine, 29, 1052-1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Bakker, J., Nijsten, M.W. and Jansen, T.C. (2013) Clinical Use of Lactate Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients. Annals of Intensive Care, 3, Article No. 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Creteur, J., Carollo, T., Soldati, G., Buchele, G., De Backer, D. and Vincent, J. (2007) The Prognostic Value of Muscle Sto2 in Septic Patients. Intensive Care Medicine, 33, 1549-1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Bateman, R.M., Sharpe, M.D., Jagger, J.E., Ellis, C.G., Solé-Violán, J., López-Rodríguez, M., et al. (2016) 36th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Critical Care, 20, Article No. 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Trzeciak, S., Dellinger, R.P., Parrillo, J.E., Guglielmi, M., Bajaj, J., Abate, N.L., et al. (2007) Early Microcirculatory Perfusion Derangements in Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Relationship to Hemodynamics, Oxygen Transport, and Survival. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 49, 88-98.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Wang, C., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Su, L., Huang, W. and Liu, D. (2020) Association between Doppler Snuffbox Resistive Index and Tissue Perfusion in Septic Patients. Shock, 54, 723-730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]