不法原因给付型侵占罪的刑法规制
Criminal Law Regulation of Embezzlement Involving Payments Made for Illegal Reasons
摘要: 受领人侵占不法原因给付物之行为是否构成侵占罪属于“民刑交叉”问题。为解决这一问题,应当以法秩序统一性理论为基本前提、以缓和的违法一元论为讨论基础,按照不法原因给付人是否具有返还请求权为标准划分不法原因给付行为。再根据主观原因理论,将两种情况本质的区别要素规范化为具有刑法意义的“给付人始因过错”,给付人具有始因过错则受领人不构成侵占罪,反之则构成。
Abstract: Whether the recipient’s act of encroaching on property given for illegal reasons constitutes the crime of embezzlement is a “civil-criminal crossover” issue. To address this problem, we should take the theory of the unity of legal order as the basic premise and the theory of mitigating illegal monism as the discussion foundation, and classify acts of payment for illegal reasons based on whether the giver has the right to claim restitution. Further, in accordance with the subjective cause theory, the essential distinguishing element between the two situations is standardized as the “giver’s initial fault” with criminal law significance. If the giver has initial fault, the recipient does not constitute the crime of embezzlement; otherwise, it is constituted.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
谭启平. 不法原因给付及其制度构建[J]. 现代法学, 2004(3): 131-140.
|
|
[2]
|
周光权. 法秩序统一性的含义与刑法体系解释[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2022, 25(2): 6-19.
|
|
[3]
|
周光权. 处理刑民交叉案件需要关注前置法[N]. 法治日报, 2021-04-07(009).
|
|
[4]
|
王昭武. 法秩序统一性视角下的不法原因给付[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2022, 25(2): 20-32.
|
|
[5]
|
张明楷. 不法原因给付与侵占罪的成否[J]. 东方法学, 2024(1): 130-145.
|
|
[6]
|
(德)韦尔策尔. 目的行为导论[M]. 陈璇, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015: 39.
|
|
[7]
|
李永军. 论不法原因给付的制度构造[J]. 政治与法律, 2016(10): 109-125.
|
|
[8]
|
张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 1260.
|
|
[9]
|
张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2024: 10.
|
|
[10]
|
许玉秀. 当代刑法思潮[M]. 北京: 中国民主法制出版社, 2005: 215-229.
|
|
[11]
|
王刚. 不法原因给付与侵占罪[J]. 中外法学, 2016, 28(4): 928-954.
|
|
[12]
|
王泽鉴. 不当得利[M]. 第2版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2023: 162.
|