基于GMS地下水数值模拟方法在煤层底板灰岩突水评价中的应用
Application of GMS-Based Groundwater Numerical Simulation Method in Water Inrush Evaluation of Coal Seam Floor from Limestone Aquifer
DOI: 10.12677/me.2026.141008, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 许光泉, 李康佳, 梁 淼, 陈 龙:安徽理工大学地球与环境学院,安徽 淮南
关键词: 岩溶水害水文地质试验数值模拟安全性评价Karst Water Hazard Hydrogeological Test Numerical Simulation Safety Evaluation
摘要: 以淮南煤田某矿的1煤层底板岩溶地下水为对象,通过水文地质试验了解水质、水位等变化,确定了断层导隔水性质和水文地质单元。采用GMS软件构建了水文地质模型和数值模拟模型,并开展了煤层底板突水性的安全性评价,结果表明:F92和F104断层带将矿井分为三个相对独立的水文地质单元,中央采区C3I组灰岩地下水,其补给来源于浅部露头区,从浅部向深部地下水富水性逐渐减弱;含水层具有非均质性和各向异性,可划分为6个水文地质块段。结合《煤矿安全防治水细则》的底板突水系数安全阈值要求,当采区煤层底板灰岩含水层的疏放控制在82 m3/h时,55天后其突水系数降至0.06 MPa/m以下,能够满足煤层安全开采的相关要求。
Abstract: Taking the karst groundwater from karst aquifer under No.1 coal seam of some coal mine in the Huainan Coalfield as the research object, hydrogeological tests are conducted to understand variations in water quality and water level, and determine the water-conducting and water-resisting properties of the faults and the hydrogeological units. The hydrogeological model and a numerical simulation model have been built. GMS software, and a safety assessment of the water inrush risk from the karst aquifer under the coal seam floor was done. The results show that: Fault zones F92 and F104 have divided the mine into three relatively independent hydrogeological units. Specifically, the groundwater in the C3I limestone group within the central mining area receives recharge from the shallow outcrop area, and the groundwater richness gradually decreases from the shallow aquifer to the deep. The aquifer is characterized by heterogeneity and anisotropy, and can be divided into 6 hydrogeological blocks. Combined with the safety threshold requirements for water inrush coefficients in coal seam floor from Detailed Rules for Coal Mine Safety and Water Inrush Prevention and Control when the drainage from the limestone aquifer under the coal seam floor is 82 m3/h, the water inrush coefficient will be less than 0.06 MPa/m after 55 days, which meets the requirements for safe mining.
文章引用:许光泉, 李康佳, 梁淼, 陈龙. 基于GMS地下水数值模拟方法在煤层底板灰岩突水评价中的应用[J]. 矿山工程, 2026, 14(1): 66-77. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2026.141008

参考文献

[1] 曾一凡, 朱慧聪, 武强, 等. 我国不同类别煤层底板水害致灾机理与防控远景导向[J]. 煤炭学报, 2025, 50(2): 1073-1099.
[2] 谢治刚, 韩锋, 陈善成, 等. 淮南煤田下组煤底板岩溶含水层系统重构及岩溶水害分源防治技术[J/OL]. 煤炭科学技术: 1-12.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2402.TD.20250918.1439.011, 2025-11-19.
[3] 邢生生. 承压含水层上方煤层底板采动裂隙演化及渗流运动数值模拟[J]. 煤炭科技, 2025, 46(5): 97-101, 107.
[4] 尹尚先, 虎维岳, 刘其声, 等. 承压含水层上采煤突水危险性评估研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2008, 37(3): 311-315.
[5] 甘林堂. 淮南矿区A组煤底板灰岩水防治及潘二矿突水事故原因分析[J]. 煤矿安全, 2018, 49(7): 171-174, 180.
[6] 刘江斌, 张仲杰, 李洋, 等. 孔隙-裂隙型耦合底板突水数值模拟模型研究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2025, 44(11): 114-119.
[7] 杨勇, 李双利, 张涛, 等. 奥陶系岩溶水对司马煤矿下组煤开采影响分析[J]. 陕西煤炭, 2025, 44(6): 72-78.
[8] 任波. 煤层底板突水防治技术[J]. 矿业装备, 2025(3): 38-40.
[9] 关继超, 韩璐, 李国勇, 等. 煤层底板奥灰突水危险性等级评价方法与工程实践研究[J]. 山西煤炭, 2025, 45(4): 32-39+46.
[10] 贺国庆, 陈俊智, 任春芳, 等. 基于流固耦合理论的含水巷道稳定性影响因素研究[J]. 矿产保护与利用, 2024, 44(4): 102-110.
[11] Qin, H., Zhang, J., Cheng, Z., Ouyang, Z., Chen, L., Yi, H., et al. (2022) Research on Overburden Failure Characteristics Based on the Theory of Plates and Shells. Sustainability, 14, Article 11441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 边凯, 李思宇, 刘博, 等. 承压水上含断层煤层开采底板突水规律研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2022, 53(6): 169-177.
[13] 刘玉卫, 商铁林, 王浩, 等. 郑州矿区告成矿煤层底板“下三带”范围研究与应用[J]. 榆林学院学报, 2021, 31(2): 5-8.
[14] 孟浩鹏, 侯恩科, 尹尚先, 等. 带压开采“厚板分段导升”突水机理研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2025, 50(S1): 250-262.
[15] 秦壮杰. 比拟法预测矿坑涌水量与结果评价浅析[J]. 中国金属通报, 2023(11): 222-224.
[16] 刘琼. 比拟法和解析法在矿坑涌水量预测中的应用[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2023, 41(5): 45-47.
[17] 刘守强, 武强, 曾一凡. 《煤矿防治水细则》修订要点解析[J]. 煤炭工程, 2019, 51(3): 1-4.