海相–陆相–油页岩的力学响应差异性研究
Differential Study on the Mechanical Response of Marine Shale, Continental Shale, and Oil Shale
DOI: 10.12677/me.2026.141010, PDF,   
作者: 谢宇新, 王鑫尧*, 董佳琪, 纪凡祥:辽宁工业大学土木建筑工程学院,辽宁 锦州;王 春:山西冶金岩土工程勘察有限公司,山西 太原
关键词: 海相页岩陆相页岩油页岩矿物组成力学性能Marine Shale Continental Shale Oil Shale Mineral Composition Mechanical Properties
摘要: 页岩的典型层理结构与矿物组分主导特性直接影响水力压裂与井壁稳定等关键工程的成效。通过对比分析不同荷载及层理取向条件下海相–陆相–油页岩的力学参数差异性,揭示了荷载垂直和平行层理状态下的三种页岩力学响应规律。结果表明:在单轴压缩条件下,海相页岩强度最高,较陆相页岩高23~147 MPa,陆相页岩较油页岩高28~49 MPa。海相页岩垂直层理的弹性模量较陆相页岩低,但平行层理的弹性模量远高于陆相页岩,而陆相页岩的弹性模量比油页岩高出10~27 GPa;在三轴压缩条件下,海相页岩的强度与弹性模量均显著优于力学性能相近的陆相页岩与油页岩,其抗压强度与弹性模量分别高出74~111 MPa与7~39 GPa;在巴西劈裂条件下,海相页岩抗拉强度同样最高,整体上较陆相页岩高0~11 MPa,而陆相页岩整体上较油页岩高0~5 MPa。该力学差异主要受控于页岩矿物组成与结构,即海相页岩中丰富的脆性矿物构成了高强度刚性骨架,而陆相页岩中高含量的黏土矿物和油页岩中丰富的有机质显著弱化了其力学性能。研究结果揭示了不同页岩储层的力学行为本质差异,为海相页岩、陆相页岩以及油页岩储层的差异化高效开发与压裂优化提供了理论依据。
Abstract: The typical bedding structures and dominant characteristics of mineral composition in shale directly influence the effectiveness of key engineering processes such as hydraulic fracturing and wellbore stability. Through a comparative analysis of the differences in mechanical parameters of marine, continental, and oil shales under varying loads and bedding orientations, three mechanical response patterns of shale under loads perpendicular and parallel to the bedding were revealed. The results indicate that under uniaxial compression, marine shale exhibits the highest strength, exceeding continental shale by 23~147 MPa, while continental shale surpasses oil shale by 28~49 MPa. The elastic modulus of marine shale perpendicular to the bedding is lower than that of continental shale, but its elastic modulus parallel to the bedding is significantly higher. In contrast, the elastic modulus of continental shale is 10~27 GPa higher than that of oil shale. Under triaxial compression, both the strength and elastic modulus of marine shale are significantly superior to those of continental and oil shales with similar mechanical properties, with compressive strength and elastic modulus exceeding them by 74~111 MPa and 7~39 GPa, respectively. Under Brazilian splitting conditions, marine shale also demonstrates the highest tensile strength, generally exceeding continental shale by 0~11 MPa, while continental shale surpasses oil shale by 0~5 MPa. These mechanical differences are primarily governed by the mineral composition and structure of the shales. Specifically, the abundance of brittle minerals in marine shale forms a high-strength rigid framework, whereas the high clay mineral content in continental shale and the rich organic matter in oil shale significantly weaken their mechanical properties. The findings reveal the fundamental differences in the mechanical behavior of various shale reservoirs, providing a theoretical basis for the differentiated and efficient development and fracturing optimization of marine, continental, and oil shale reservoirs.
文章引用:谢宇新, 王鑫尧, 董佳琪, 纪凡祥, 王春. 海相–陆相–油页岩的力学响应差异性研究[J]. 矿山工程, 2026, 14(1): 92-101. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2026.141010

参考文献

[1] 王敬, 魏志鹏, 胡俊瑜. 中国页岩油气开发历程与理论技术进展[J]. 石油化工应用, 2021, 40(10): 1-4+18.
[2] 王建, 郭秋麟, 赵晨蕾, 等. 中国主要盆地页岩油气资源潜力及发展前景[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2033-2044.
[3] 王迎港, 申峰, 吴金桥, 等. 海相与陆相页岩微观特征差异及其对可压性的影响[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(1): 26-33.
[4] 郭春礼, 杨爽, 王安东, 等. 修武盆地下寒武统海相页岩储层及CH4吸附特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(4): 598-610.
[5] 左如斯, 杨威, 王乾右, 等. 川西坳陷须家河组陆相页岩岩相控制下的微观储集特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(6): 22-28.
[6] 钱家麟, 王剑秋, 李术元. 世界油页岩综述[J]. 中国能源, 2006(8): 16-19.
[7] Wang, D.M., Xu, Y.M., He, D.M., et al. (2009) Investigation of Mineral Composition of Oil Shale. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 4, 691-697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Zhang, Z.J., Zhang, H.Y., Yang, X.X., et al. (2016) Mineralogical Characterization and Washability of Longkou Oil Shale. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization & Environmental Effects.
[9] Al-Ananzeh, N.M., Al-Smadi, M.L. and Dawagreh, A.M.A. (2018) Thermogravimetric and Composition Analysis of Jordanian Oil Shale. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 40, 1374-1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 张洪, 李靖, 郑庆龙, 等. 页岩孔缝结构及海相与陆相储层特征差异研究[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2017, 39(1): 1-6.
[11] 孙彩蓉, 唐书恒, 魏建光. 中国南方海相页岩气与华北煤系页岩气储层特征差异分析[J]. 中国矿业, 2017, 26(3): 166-170.
[12] 管全中, 董大忠, 王淑芳, 等. 海相和陆相页岩储层微观结构差异性分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(3): 524-531.
[13] Wang, Q., Tang, H., Guo, Z., Cheng, G., Lv, Z. and Liu, Q. (2022) Geological and Geochemical Characteristics of the Terrestrial Lower Jurassic Shale in Tarim Basin and Its Favorable Exploration Areas. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, Article 839427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Wu, W., Liao, Z., Chen, H., Li, S., Su, A., Hussain, I., et al. (2021) Jurassic Terrestrial Shale Gas Potential of the Northern Kashi Sag in the Tarim Basin, Northwestern China. Geofluids, 2021, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Saif, T., Lin, Q., Butcher, A.R., Bijeljic, B. and Blunt, M.J. (2017) Multi-Scale Multi-Dimensional Microstructure Imaging of Oil Shale Pyrolysis Using X-Ray Micro-Tomography, Automated Ultra-High Resolution SEM, MAPS Mineralogy and FIB-SEM. Applied Energy, 202, 628-647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Jovančićević, B., Stojanović, K. and Životić, D. (2024) Organic Geochemical Study of Aleksinac Oil Shale. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 113, 1819-1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Huang, X.D., Yang, D., Wang, G.Y., et al. (2024) Evolution Patterns and Anisotropic Connectivity Characteristics of Pores and Fissures in Oil Shale after Steam Heating at Different Temperatures. Natural Resources Research, 34, 409-425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 王一婷, 杨爽, 石常亮, 等. 修武盆地下寒武统荷塘组海相页岩单轴应力作用下的各向异性研究[J]. 东华理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 45(5): 443-451.
[19] 王鑫尧. 陆相页岩水力裂缝沟通扩展及激活结构面机理研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2022.
[20] 严轩辰. 农安和桦甸油页岩力学性能及其水力压裂与破碎关键参数研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2012.
[21] 严轩辰, 陈晨, 刘鑫鹏, 等. 农安油页岩物理力学性能及其水力压裂设计中的相关参数计算[J]. 探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程), 2012, 39(2): 9-11.
[22] 陈晨, 沈国军, 张颖, 等. 汪清、农安和桦甸油页岩物理力学性质及裂缝起裂压力对比分析研究[J]. 探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程), 2019, 46(3): 1-6.
[23] 沈国军, 陈晨, 高帅, 等. 汪清油页岩物理力学性质及裂缝起裂压力的研究[J]. 探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程), 2018, 45(9): 1-4.
[24] 衡帅, 杨春和, 张保平, 等. 页岩各向异性特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(3): 609-616.
[25] 李士斌, 梁凯, 王昶皓, 等. 层理性页岩各向异性井壁失稳机理研究[J]. 当代化工, 2022, 51(3): 550-554.
[26] 朱颖. 油页岩层理对其力学特性及裂缝起裂与扩展的影响研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2022.
[27] He, J. and Afolagboye, L.O. (2017) Influence of Layer Orientation and Interlayer Bonding Force on the Mechanical Behavior of Shale under Brazilian Test Conditions. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 34, 349-358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Wang, D. and Liu, Z.D. (2023) Lamina Influences on Tensile Strength of Shallow Marine Shales from Upper Ordovician, Western Ordos Basin. ACS Omega, 8, 30024-30036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] 张润辉. 非均质陆相页岩导流能力研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2023.
[30] 王拔秀, 张鹏辉, 梁杰, 等. 生物成因微晶石英特征及其对海相页岩储层孔隙发育的影响[J]. 沉积学报, 2024, 42(5): 1738-1752.
[31] 陈立超, 张典坤, 吕帅锋, 等. 海/陆相页岩微观力学性质压痕测试研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2022, 29(6): 31-38.
[32] 康毅力, 白佳佳, 游利军. 有机质含量对页岩声波传播特性的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1341-1349.
[33] 刘圣鑫, 王宗秀, 张林炎, 等. 基于纳米压痕的页岩微观力学性质分析[J]. 实验力学, 2018, 33(6): 957-968.