同伴“低头族”对大学生手机成瘾的影响
The Influence of Peer “Phubbing” on Mobile Phone Addiction of College Students
摘要: 在“低头”行为成为大学生群体日常交往习惯的背景下，本研究考察同伴phubbing对手机成瘾的影响机制，并检验同伴压力与同伴低头行为规范的中介作用。采用整群取样法回收湖北某高校382份有效问卷(M年龄 = 21.0 ± 1.45)，使用同伴Phubbing量表、手机成瘾量表、手机使用同伴压力量表与同伴低头行为规范量表进行测量。结构方程模型结果显示：1) 同伴Phubbing显著正向预测大学生手机成瘾(β = 0.13, p < 0.05)；2) 同伴压力与同伴低头行为规范分别发挥部分中介作用，效应值分别为0.05 (16.1%)与0.13 (41.9%)，总中介效应占总效应的58.1%；3) 控制性别、年级后结果依然稳健。研究支持社会规范理论与印象管理理论，揭示“同伴–规范–成瘾”这一社会传染路径，为高校制定以群体规范重塑为核心的低头干预策略提供实证依据。
Abstract: As “phubbing” becomes routine in university students’ daily interactions, this study examines how peer phubbing shapes mobile-phone addiction and tests the mediating roles of peer pressure and descriptive norms regarding phone snubbing. A total of 382 valid questionnaires (Mage = 21.0 ± 1.45) were collected through cluster sampling from one university in Hubei Province. The Peer Phubbing Scale, Mobile-Phone Addiction Scale, Peer Pressure on Mobile-Phone Use Scale, and Perceived Norms of Phubbing Scale were administered. Structural-equation modelling yielded three key findings: 1) Peer phubbing significantly predicted university students’ mobile-phone addiction (β = 0.13, p < 0.05); 2) Both peer pressure and phubbing norms served as parallel partial mediators, accounting for 16.1% (effect = 0.05) and 41.9 % (effect = 0.13) of the total effect, respectively, with the combined indirect effect explaining 58.1% of the total effect; 3) The results remained robust after controlling for gender and grade level. The findings corroborate social-norms theory and impression-management theory, delineate a “peer-norm-addiction” social-contagion pathway, and provide empirical guidance for campus interventions aimed at reshaping group norms to reduce phubbing.
文章引用：陈秋仪 (2026). 同伴“低头族”对大学生手机成瘾的影响. 心理学进展, 16(1), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.161012

参考文献

[1] 查圣祥(2019). 大学生手机成瘾对其社会适应的影响: 友谊质量的中介作用. 江苏第二师范学院学报, 35(6), 54-58.
[2] 陈靖敏(2019). 中学生生活事件、反刍思维、同伴依恋及手机成瘾的关系及干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[3] 邓林园, 张锦涛, 方晓义, 刘勤学, 汤海艳, 兰菁(2012). 父母冲突与青少年网络成瘾的关系: 冲突评价和情绪管理的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 28(5), 539-544.
[4] 丁倩, 张永欣, 周宗奎(2019). 父母低头族与中学生手机成瘾的关系: 父母监控的调节作用. 中国特殊教育, (1), 66-71.
[5] 林丹华, 范兴华, 潘瑾(2010). 环境和个体因素与青少年饮酒行为的关系. 心理发展与教育, 26(3), 288-294.
[6] 林丹华, 方晓义, 冒荣(2008). 父母和同伴因素对青少年饮酒行为的影响. 心理发展与教育, 24(3), 36-42.
[7] 林茵(2017). 父母运动、手机使用对初中生手机成瘾的影响. 硕士学位论文, 深圳: 深圳大学.
[8] 刘丹(2018). 中学生同伴影响与手机成癮的关系自我控制的调节效应. 硕士学位论文, 开封: 河南大学.
[9] 刘璐, 方晓义, 张锦涛, 刘凤娥, 陈超, 赵会春, 申子姣(2013). 大学生网络成瘾: 背景性渴求与同伴网络过度使用行为及态度的交互作用, 心理发展与教育, 29(4), 424-433.
[10] 吕帅, 邱宗满(2020). 自尊对大学生手机成瘾的影响: 同伴关系的中介作用和自我认知的调节作用. 现代预防医学. 47(2), 296-299.
[11] 王永茜(2015). 论刑法上裁判规范与行为规范的分离. 清华法学, 9(5), 145-160.
[12] 熊婕, 周宗奎, 陈武, 游志麒, 翟紫艳(2012). 大学生手机成瘾倾向量表的编制. 中国心理卫生杂志, 26(3), 222-225.
[13] 徐夫真, 张文新(2011). 青少年疏离感与病理性互联网使用的关系: 家庭功能和同伴接纳的调节效应检验. 心理学报. 43(4), 410-419.
[14] 许慧, 黄亚梅, 胡翔宇, 等(2020). 河南省某两所普通高中学生智能手机成瘾与同伴低头族、抵制效能感的关系. 医学与社会, 33(7), 94-97.
[15] 杨欣欣, 刘勤学, 周宗奎(2017). 大学生网络社会支持对网络利他行为的影响: 感恩和社会认同的作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 183-190.
[16] 张锦涛, 陈超, 刘凤娥, 邓林园, 方晓义(2012). 同伴网络过度使用行为和态度、网络使用同伴压力与大学生网络成瘾的关系. 心理发展与教育, 6(3), 634-640.
[17] 张锦涛, 刘勤学, 邓林园, 方晓义, 刘朝莹, 兰菁(2011). 青少年亲子关系与网络成瘾: 孤独感的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 27(6), 641-647.
[18] Bauman, K. E., & Ennett, S. T. (1996). On the Importance of Peer Influence for Adolescent Drug Use: Commonly Neglected Considerations. Addiction, 91, 185-198.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353-376.[CrossRef] 
[20] Bundura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Children and Youth Services Review, 12, 34-54.
[21] Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “Phubbing” Becomes the Norm: The Antecedents and Consequences of Snubbing via Smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9-18.[CrossRef] 
[22] Clasen, D. R., & Brown, B. B. (1985). The Multidimensionality of Peer Pressure in Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14, 451-468.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Kalkan, M. (2012). Predictiveness of Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions on University Students’ Problematic Internet Use. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1305-1308.[CrossRef] 
[24] Park, B., & Lee, K. C. (2011). The Effect of Users’ Characteristics and Experiential Factors on the Compulsive Usage of the Smartphone. In Th. Kim, H. Adeli, R. J. Robles, & M. Balitanas (Eds.), Ubiquitous Computing and Multimedia Applications (pp. 438-446). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.[CrossRef] 
[25] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Smahel, D., Brown, B. B., & Blinka, L. (2012). Associations between Online Friendship and Internet Addiction among Adolescents and Emerging Adults. Developmental Psychology, 48, 381-388.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Zhang, K., Chen, C., Zhao, S. et al. (2014). Compulsive Smartphone Use: The Roles of Flow, Reinforcement Motives, and Convenience. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 678-689). Association for Information Systems.