生态环境领域“首违不罚”制度的困境检视与系统优化——基于规范结构与适用逻辑的双维分析
Navigating the Pitfalls of “No Penalty for First-Time Violation” in Environmental Enforcement—A Dual-Perspective Inquiry into Structural Flaws and Logical Inconsistencies
摘要: 生态环境领域“首违不罚”制度是包容审慎监管原则的重要体现,然其实践效能因内外双重困境而受限。内部困境源于制度自身的“前宽后窄”式结构性缺陷:构成要件裁量过宽导致“同案不同判”,法律效果裁量过窄导致“罚与不罚”的二元僵局。外部困境则表现为执法实践中《行政处罚法》第33条与生态环境单行法规范适用的逻辑混淆,存在“不敢用、不会用”的适用障碍。为系统破解上述困境,未来优化应遵循“内外兼修”的路径:对内,须从统一要件基准、构建梯度化效果裁量、强化多元责任衔接及完善程序规则等方面,实现制度的精细化建构;对外,须明晰“结合型”与“排他型”两种直接适用《行政处罚法》的规范进路,并辅以充分的释法说理,从而在坚守法治底线的前提下,充分释放“首违不罚”制度的治理效能,助推生态环境治理体系现代化。
Abstract: The “No Penalty for First-Time Violation” system in the ecological environment field is a key manifestation of the principle of inclusive and prudent regulation. However, its practical effectiveness is constrained by dual internal and external dilemmas. The internal dilemma stems from the system’s own “broad-narrow” structural defect: excessively broad discretion in constitutive requirements leads to “differential treatment in similar cases,” while overly narrow discretion in legal effects results in the binary dilemma of “to punish or not to punish.” The external dilemma is reflected in the logical confusion in the application of Article 33 of the Administrative Punishment Law and specific ecological environment laws during enforcement practices, creating applicability barriers where officials “dare not use or do not know how to use” the provision. To systematically resolve these dilemmas, future optimization should follow a “two-pronged” approach. Internally, refined construction of the system must be achieved by unifying standards for constitutive requirements, establishing a tiered system for discretionary legal effects, strengthening the integration of multiple responsibilities, and improving procedural rules. Externally, the two normative approaches of “combinatorial application” and “exclusive application” for directly applying the Administrative Punishment Law must be clarified, supplemented by fully reasoned legal interpretations. This will fully unleash the governance efficacy of the “No Penalty for First-Time Violation” system while upholding the bottom line of the rule of law, thereby advancing the modernization of the ecological environment governance system.
文章引用:段博文. 生态环境领域“首违不罚”制度的困境检视与系统优化——基于规范结构与适用逻辑的双维分析[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(1): 55-62. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.141008

参考文献

[1] 黄海华. 新《行政处罚法》制度创新的理论解析[J]. 行政法学研究, 2021(6): 3-15.
[2] 陈诚. 生态环境“首违不罚”制度的现存问题与规范路径[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2023, 22(2): 71-82.
[3] 彭中遥. 生态环境“首违不罚”的法理阐释与优化进路[J]. 学习与实践, 2024(8): 65-73.
[4] 谭宗泽, 许鹏. “首违不罚”制度的法理阐释与体系优化[J]. 人民司法, 2024(27): 95-100.
[5] 于安. 行政裁量权的行使与治理[J]. 中国法律评论, 2025(2): 2-14.
[6] 谢红星. 《行政处罚法》不予处罚条款的直接适用[J]. 行政法学研究, 2025(4): 15-29.
[7] 李爱年, 万知涵. 生态环境“首违不罚”的规制逻辑及困局破解[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 46(1): 71-81.
[8] 傅馨. 行政处罚中“首违不罚”的法律适用困境与完善[J]. 中国价格监管与反垄断, 2025(2): 116-118.