未来时间观通过工作繁荣影响心理健康的机制研究
The Mechanism of How Future Time Perspective Influences Mental Health through Thriving at Work
DOI: 10.12677/ar.2026.131002, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张丽瑶：河北中医药大学人文管理系，河北 石家庄
关键词: 无限未来时间观；工作繁荣；心理健康；Open-Ended Future Time Perspective； Thriving at Work； Mental Health
摘要: 目的：基于社会情绪选择理论，本研究考察了工作繁荣在无限未来时间观和心理健康之间的中介作用。方法：采用四轮问卷调查设计，对170名员工测量了未来时间观、工作繁荣及心理健康，使用SPSS 24.0进行中介效应检验。结果：相关分析显示，无限未来时间观与工作繁荣(r = 0.257, p < 0.01)、工作繁荣与心理健康(r = 0.257, p < 0.01)均呈显著正相关。工作繁荣的间接效应显著(间接效应值 = 0.084，95% CI [0.025, 0.159])，且直接效应不显著，并与间接效应符号相反，提示存在遮掩效应。结论：员工无限未来时间观可以通过激发其工作繁荣间接促进心理健康水平。
Abstract: Objective: Based on Socioemotional Selectivity Theory (SST), this study examined the mediating role of thriving at work in the relationship between an open-ended future time perspective (OFTP) and mental health. Methods: A four-wave longitudinal survey design was employed. Data on future time perspective, thriving at work, and mental health were collected from 170 employees. SPSS 24.0 was used to test the mediation effect. Results: Correlation analysis revealed that OFTP was significantly positively correlated with thriving at work (r = 0.257, p < 0.01), and thriving at work was significantly positively correlated with mental health (r = 0.257, p < 0.01). The indirect effect through thriving at work was significant (indirect effect = 0.084, 95% CI [0.025, 0.159]). The direct effect was non-significant and opposite in sign to the indirect effect, suggesting the presence of a suppressing effect. Conclusion: Employees’ open-ended future time perspective can indirectly promote their mental health levels by stimulating thriving at work.
文章引用：张丽瑶. 未来时间观通过工作繁荣影响心理健康的机制研究[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(1): 10-15. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.131002

参考文献

[1] Kooij, D.T.A.M. (2015) Successful Aging at Work: The Active Role of Employees. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 309-319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Zacher, H. (2014) Successful Aging at Work. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 4-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Carstensen, L.L. (2006) The Influence of a Sense of Time on Human Development. Science, 312, 1913-1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Carstensen, L.L., Isaacowitz, D.M. and Charles, S.T. (1999) Taking Time Seriously: A Theory of Socioemotional Selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S. and Grant, A.M. (2005) A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work. Organization Science, 16, 537-549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Zacher, H. and Frese, M. (2009) Remaining Time and Opportunities at Work: Relationships between Age, Work Characteristics, and Occupational Future Time Perspective. Psychology and Aging, 24, 487-493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Gerbasi, A., Porath, C.L., Parker, A., Spreitzer, G. and Cross, R. (2015) Destructive De-Energizing Relationships: How Thriving Buffers Their Effect on Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1423-1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Spreitzer, G.M. and Porath, C. (2014) Self-Determination as for Thriving: Building an Integrative Model of Human Growth at Work. In: The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory, Oxford University Press, 245-258.
[9] Spreitzer, G., Porath, C.L. and Gibson, C.B. (2012) Toward Human Sustainability: How to Enable More Thriving at Work. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 155-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C. and Garnett, F.G. (2012) Thriving at Work: Toward Its Measurement, Construct Validation, and Theoretical Refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 250-275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Keyes, C.L.M. (2002) The Mental Health Continuum: From Languishing to Flourishing in Life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207-222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Goldberg, D. and Williams, P. (1988) General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson.
[13] 熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 等. 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(5): 757-769.
[14] 周浩, 龙立荣. 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(6): 942-942.
[15] Kleine, A.K., Rudolph, C.W. and Zacher, H. (2019) Thriving at Work: A Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40, 973-999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] MacKinnon, D.P., Krull, J.L. and Lockwood, C.M. (2000) Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Lang, F.R. and Carstensen, L.L. (2002) Time Counts: Future Time Perspective, Goals, and Social Relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17, 125-139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

为你推荐