当代大学生和谐心智结构探析:基于扎根理论的质性研究
Exploring the Structure of HeXie Mindset in Chinese College Students: A Grounded Theory-Based Qualitative Research
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.151008, PDF,   
作者: 王 丹*:西交利物浦大学产业家学院与和谐管理研究中心,江苏 苏州;上海建桥学院招生办,上海;吴雨晨:西交利物浦大学产业家学院与和谐管理研究中心,江苏 苏州;李 敏:西交利物浦大学中国文化教学中心,江苏 苏州
关键词: 和谐心智质性研究大学生扎根理论动态协同HeXie Mindset Qualitative Research College Students Grounded Theory Collaborative Mechanism
摘要: 目的:本研究旨在运用质性研究方法,深入探索当代中国大学生和谐心智的结构与内涵,并构建本土化的理论模型。方法:采用扎根理论研究方法,通过深度访谈和焦点小组访谈收集数据,运用Nvivo23.0软件进行编码分析。共访谈23名大学生,并遵循扎根理论的开放式编码、主轴式编码和选择性编码三级编码程序进行数据分析。结果:本研究共产生306个初级编码,最终形成了4个关联式编码,分别是:认知–现实校准(准确理解和适应现实世界)、情感–需求适配(平衡自身情感需求与外部环境)、意志–行动闭环(意图驱动行动并有效管理过程)、系统–动态平衡(整合内外资源,维持动态平衡)。其中,认知–现实校准、情感–需求适配、意志–行动闭环构成和谐心智的基本模块,系统–动态平衡则体现其协同机制,依赖于自主性整合、反思性认知和适应性调节三种机制的动态运作。结论:和谐心智并非静态特质,而是一种动态协同的复杂问题解决模型,体现了中国文化情境下大学生特有的心理智慧,为理解和培养大学生健全心智提供了新的视角。本研究构建的和谐心智结构模型,为后续相关研究和实践应用奠定了理论基础。
Abstract: Objective: This study aims to explore the structure and connotation of the HeXie mindset, a concept specific to contemporary Chinese college students, using a qualitative research approach and to construct a localized theoretical model. Methods: A grounded theory approach was employed, using in-depth interviews and focus group interviews to collect data, and Nvivo12.0 software for coding analysis. Twenty-three college students were interviewed, and data analysis followed the three-stage coding process of grounded theory: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. Results: In this study, 306 open codes and 4 selected codes were generated. The structure of HeXie Mindset consists of four interrelated dimensions: cognitive-reality calibration (accurately understanding and adapting to the real world), emotional-needs adaptation (balancing personal emotional needs with the external environment), volition-action loop (intention-driven action and effective process management), and system-dynamic balance (integrating internal and external resources to maintain dynamic equilibrium). Cognitive-reality calibration, emotional-needs adaptation, and will-action loop constitute the basic modules of the HeXie mindset, while system-dynamic balance embodies its collaborative mechanism, relying on the dynamic operation of three mechanisms: autonomous integration, reflective cognition, and adaptive regulation. Conclusion: The HeXie mindset is not a static trait but a dynamic and collaborative complex problem-solving model, reflecting the unique psychological wisdom of Chinese college students in their cultural context. This study provides a new perspective for understanding and cultivating the well-being of college students’ minds. The constructed structural model of the HeXie mindset lays a theoretical foundation for future research and practical applications.
文章引用:王丹, 吴雨晨, 李敏. 当代大学生和谐心智结构探析:基于扎根理论的质性研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(1): 57-70. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.151008

参考文献

[1] James, W. (1904) The Principles of Psychology. Henry Holt and Company.
[2] Craik, K.J. (1966) The Nature of Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
[3] Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1975) The Computer and the Mind: An Introduction to Cognitive Science. Harvard University Press.
[4] Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1989) Mental Models. In: Posner, M.I., Ed., The Foundations of Cognitive Science, The MIT Press, 469-500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Gentner, D. (1983) Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[6] Fodor, J.A. (1981) The Mind’s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. Basic Books.
[7] Rouse, W.B. and Morris, N.M. (1986) On Looking into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349-363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Collins, A. and Gentner, D. (1987) How People Construct Mental Models. In: Holland, D. and Quinn, N., Eds., Cultural Models in Language and Thought, Cambridge University Press, 243-266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Johnson-Laird, P.N. (2013) Mental Models and Cognitive Change. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 131-138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 李林英, 刘平青, 孟凡臣. 图式, 心智模式及其管理[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2005(6): 70-73.
[11] 曹振杰. 基于扎根理论的员工和谐心智模式构念开发[J]. 管理学报, 2013, 10(8): 1110-1116.
[12] Senge, P.M. (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of The Learning Organization. Currency Doubleday.
[13] Senge, P.M. (2006) The Necessary Revolution: How Individuals and Organizations Are Creating a Sustainable World. Doubleday.
[14] 骆志豪, 胡金星. 高层管理者的心智模式研究[J]. 学海, 2010(6): 56-59.
[15] 罗纪宁. 中国管理学研究的实践导向与理论框架——一个组织管理系统全息结构[J]. 管理学报, 2010, 7(11): 1646-1651, 1670.
[16] 席酉民. 和谐心智——鲜为人知的西浦管理故事[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2020.
[17] 韩巍, 席酉民. 再论和谐管理理论及其对实践与学术的启发[J]. 西安交通大学学报: 社会科学版, 2021, 41(1): 39-50.
[18] 李鹏飞, 葛京, 席酉民. 和谐管理视角下的领导研究发展初探[J]. 管理学报, 2014, 11(11): 591-1600.
[19] 席酉民. 未来教育的核心: 心智营造[J]. 高等教育研究, 2020, 41(4): 9-13.
[20] 夏当英, 张雨豪. “快速社会化”: 数字时代青少年社会化趋向、困境与纾解[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 36(4): 110-120.
[21] Bauman, Z. (2013) Liquid Modernity. John Wiley & Sons.
[22] 黎娟娟, 黎文华. Z世代大学生多重矛盾性社会心态解析[J]. 中国青年研究, 2022(7): 104-110, 30.
[23] 岳封疆, 袁帅, 肖光燕, 江雪华. 特质愤怒与大学生心智化的关系: 有调节的中介模型[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2024, 32(2): 314-320.
[24] 曹振杰, 盖玉妍. 员工和谐心智模式、创新绩效与组织公平——基于浙江服务业的实证研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2015, 29(12): 19-25.
[25] 席酉民, 张晓军, 李娜. 和谐教育之道: 西交利物浦大学办学探索与实践[J]. 世界教育信息, 2022, 35(10): 3-8.
[26] 陈向明. 质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2000.
[27] Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L. (2006) How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18, 59-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] 袁岳, 汤雪梅. 焦点团体座谈会: 定性研究方法使用指南[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2001.
[29] Schreier, M. (2012) Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. SAGE Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2014) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications.
[31] Fetzer, J.H. (1999) Mental Models: Reasoning without Rules. Minds and Machines, 9, 119-126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Doyle, J.K. and Ford, D.N. (1998) Mental Models Concepts for System Dynamics Research. System Dynamics Review, 14, 3-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Norman, D.A. (2014) Some Observations on Mental Models. In: Mental Models, Psychology Press, 21-36.
[34] 吕晓俊, 俞文钊. 员工心智模式的实证研究[J]. 心理科学, 2002, 25(6): 736-737.
[35] Izard, C.E. (1993) Four Systems for Emotion Activation: Cognitive and Noncognitive Processes. Psychological Review, 100, 68-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Erikson, E.H. and Erikson, J.M. (1998) The Life Cycle Completed (Extended Version). WW Norton & Company.
[37] 熊艳青, 王乐婷, 徐丹. “Z世代”大学生能成为基层就业的主力军吗?——基于类型分析的视角[J]. 中国青年研究, 2024(8): 94-102+119.
[38] 李春玲, 高云浩. 学业和就业竞争压力下大学生社会心态特征——基于2023年“中国大学生追踪调查”数据分析[J]. 青年探索, 2024(5): 17-24.
[39] Gruender, C.D. (1996) Constructivism and Learning: A Philosophical Appraisal. Educational Technology, 36, 21-29.
[40] 李小玄, 王婷, 郑允佳. 主动性人格与大学生创业意向: 职业探索的中介效应[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2021, 29(8): 1253-1257.
[41] Bateman, T.S. and Crant, J.M. (1993) The Proactive Component of Organizational Behavior: A Measure and Correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103-118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[42] 李笑燃. 大学生主动性社交网站使用与友谊质量的关系: 线上积极反馈和社交自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2024, 32(2): 446-450.
[43] 吴洁清, 董勇燕, 熊俊梅, 曹钰. 大学生主动性人格与生涯适应力的关系: 成就动机的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(5): 547-556.
[44] 王丹, 葛衡, 卢虹宇. 大学生社团活动与学业表现及自我效能感的关系[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2017, 25(7): 1030-1034.
[45] 李康. 学生发展理论在学生事务管理中的应用——美国学生发展理论简介[J]. 高等教育研究, 2008, 29(3): 19-27.
[46] Evans, N.J., Forney, D.S., Guido, F.M., Patton, L.D. and Renn, K.A. (2009) Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice. John Wiley & Sons.
[47] Piaget, J. (1995) Sociological Studies. Routledge.
[48] 蒋柯, 李其维. 论皮亚杰的方法论及其当代意义[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 1017-1030.
[49] 朱韶蓁. 大学生适应性量表(CAS)的修订及应用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学. 2006.