基于MATLAB/Simulink的主动悬架PID与LQR控制策略仿真对比研究
Simulation Comparison Study of PID and LQR Control Strategies for Active Suspension Based on MATLAB/Simulink
DOI: 10.12677/dsc.2026.151004, PDF,   
作者: 程 华, 魏 银:西华大学汽车与交通学院,四川 成都
关键词: 主动悬架PID控制LQR最优控制MATLAB/SimulinkActive Suspension PID Control LQR Optimal Control MATLAB/Simulink
摘要: 汽车悬架系统是决定车辆平顺性、操纵稳定性及行驶舒适性的核心部件。为对比不同控制策略对主动悬架的控制效果,本文以1/4主动悬架系统为研究对象,基于牛顿第二定律建立其动力学微分方程,并进一步推导得到状态空间方程,且验证了系统的能控性与能观性。利用MATLAB/Simulink仿真软件搭建仿真环境,以白噪声信号模拟随机路面输入,分别设计PID控制策略与LQR最优控制策略,围绕车身加速度、悬架动挠度及轮胎动位移三大核心评价指标,对比分析两种控制策略的仿真结果,明确二者在主动悬架控制中的性能优势差异,为悬架控制策略的优化选择提供参考。
Abstract: The automotive suspension system is a core component that determines vehicle ride comfort, handling stability, and driving smoothness. To compare the control effects of different control strategies on active suspensions, this study takes a 1/4 active suspension system as the research object. Dynamic differential equations are established based on Newton’s second law, and the state-space equations are further derived with verification of the system’s controllability and observability. Using MATLAB/Simulink simulation software to build the simulation environment, white noise signals are adopted to simulate random road inputs. PID control strategy and LQR optimal control strategy are designed respectively. Centering on three core evaluation indicators—body acceleration, suspension dynamic deflection, and tire dynamic displacement—the simulation results of the two control strategies are compared and analyzed. The differences in performance advantages between the two in active suspension control are clarified, providing a reference for the optimal selection of suspension control strategies.
文章引用:程华, 魏银. 基于MATLAB/Simulink的主动悬架PID与LQR控制策略仿真对比研究[J]. 动力系统与控制, 2026, 15(1): 43-55. https://doi.org/10.12677/dsc.2026.151004

参考文献

[1] 王健, 陈晓峰, 李娜. 汽车主动悬架多目标控制策略对比研究[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2024(3): 231-235.
[2] 中国汽车工业协会. 2024年中国汽车底盘技术发展报告[R]. 北京: 中国汽车工业出版社, 2024.
[3] 陈龙, 黄晨, 周鋐. 汽车主动悬架控制理论与工程实践[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2022.
[4] 张洪信, 刘镇, 赵清海. 主动悬架LQR控制权重系数多目标优化方法[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(7): 1123-1130.
[5] Chen, W., Li, Y. and Zhang, H. (2023) Multi-Objective Optimization of LQR Weight Coefficients for Active Suspension Systems. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 24, 457-466.
[6] 赵迪, 刘洋, 张明. 1/4主动悬架动力学建模与能控性验证[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 34(10): 56-62.
[7] Zhang, Y., Wang, Q. and Li, M. (2021) Modeling and Simulation of 1/4 Active Suspension System Based on MATLAB/Simulink. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 235, 3451-3460.
[8] 中国汽车工程研究院股份有限公司. GB/T40429-2021汽车悬架系统性能测试方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
[9] 黄海波, 翁胜峰, 陈星欣. 双横臂悬架的非线性多体建模与动力学分析[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2025, 44(9): 1387-1393.
[10] 刘杰, 吴刚, 张伟. 基于白噪声激励的随机路面悬架仿真分析[J]. 计算机仿真, 2023, 40(5): 135-139.
[11] Liu, H., Zhang, L. and Chen, G. (2024) Comparison of PID and LQR Control Strategies for Vehicle Active Suspension under Random Road Excitation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 201, Article ID: 110892.
[12] 李军, 王磊, 陈阳. 基于改进齐格勒-尼科尔斯法的悬架PID参数整定[J]. 控制工程, 2022, 29(4): 689-695.
[13] 孙仁云, 周兵. 汽车控制系统MATLAB/Simulink仿真教程[M]. 第3版. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2021.
[14] Zhang, L., Han, J. and Wang, Y. (2022) Fuzzy PID Control for Active Suspension Based on Road Condition Estimation. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 144, Article ID: 081006.