化妆对去人性化的影响——面孔吸引力的中介作用
Effects of Makeup on Dehumanization—The Mediating Effect of Facial Attractiveness
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.161025, PDF,   
作者: 吴诺希：西南大学心理学部，重庆
关键词: 化妆；去人性化；面孔吸引力；Makeup； Dehumanization； Facial Attractiveness
摘要: 目的：探讨化妆程度对去人性化的影响。方法：采用单因素被试间设计，化妆程度分为素颜、淡妆、浓妆三种。被试随机观看三张女性照片，对照片进行评价。共回收277份。结果：1) 化妆程度的主效应显著，即不同化妆程度对去人性化的影响存在显著差异。2) 素颜组相较于淡妆组去人性化程度更高。3) 浓妆组相较于淡妆组去人性化程度更高。4) 面孔吸引力在化妆程度与去人性化之间起中介作用，不同的化妆程度之间存在差异。结论：淡妆可能是去人性化的一种保护方式。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the effects of makeup on dehumanization. Methods: A single-factor (bare face, light makeup, heavy makeup) between-subject design was employed. Participants were randomly assigned to view three photos of female faces of the same intensity and then answered questions about dehumanization, collecting a total of 277 valid responses. Results: 1) The main effect of makeup intensity is significant, indicating that there are significant differences in the impact of different makeup intensities on dehumanization. 2) The no-makeup group exhibits a higher level of dehumanization compared to the light-makeup group. 3) The heavy-makeup group demonstrates a higher level of dehumanization compared to the light-makeup group. 4) Facial attractiveness mediates the relationship between makeup intensity and dehumanization, with variations observed across different levels of makeup intensity. Conclusion: Light makeup may serve as a protective factor against dehumanization.
文章引用：吴诺希 (2026). 化妆对去人性化的影响——面孔吸引力的中介作用. 心理学进展, 16(1), 204-212. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.161025

参考文献

[1] 韩雨芳, 喻丰, 杨沈龙(2020). 非人化的原因、结果及对策. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(6), 1177-1134.
[2] 宋锡妍, 程亚华, 谢周秀甜, 龚楠焰, 刘雷(2021). 愤怒情绪对延迟折扣的影响: 确定感和控制感的中介作用. 心理学报, 53(5), 456-468.
[3] Alaei, R., Deska, J. C., Hugenberg, K., & Rule, N. O. (2022). People Attribute Humanness to Men and Women Differently Based on Their Facial Appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123, 400-422.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Arai, T., & Nittono, H. (2022). Cosmetic Makeup Enhances Facial Attractiveness and Affective Neural Responses. PLOS ONE, 17, e0272923.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Batres, C., Russell, R., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., Hansen, A. M., & Cronk, L. (2018). Evidence that Makeup Is a False Signal of Sociosexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 148-154.[CrossRef] 
[6] Bernard, P., Content, J., Servais, L., Wollast, R., & Gervais, S. (2020). An Initial Test of the Cosmetics Dehumanization Hypothesis: Heavy Makeup Diminishes Attributions of Humanness-Related Traits to Women. Sex Roles, 83, 315-327.[CrossRef] 
[7] Berry, D. S. (1991). Attractive Faces Are Not All Created Equal: Joint Effects of Facial Babyishness and Attractiveness on Social Perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 523-531.[CrossRef] 
[8] DelPriore, D. J., Bradshaw, H. K., & Hill, S. E. (2018). Appearance Enhancement Produces a Strategic Beautification Penalty among Women. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12, 348-366.[CrossRef] 
[9] Etcoff, N. L., Stock, S., Haley, L. E., Vickery, S. A., & House, D. M. (2011). Cosmetics as a Feature of the Extended Human Phenotype: Modulation of the Perception of Biologically Important Facial Signals. PLOS ONE, 6, e25656.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of Mind Perception. Science, 315, 619-619.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Guéguen, N., & Jacob, C. (2011). Enhanced Female Attractiveness with Use of Cosmetics and Male Tipping Behavior in Restaurants. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 62, 283-290.
[13] Haslam, N. (2022). Dehumanization and the Lack of Social Connection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 312-316.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Haslam, N., & Stratemeyer, M. (2016). Recent Research on Dehumanization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 25-29.[CrossRef] 
[15] Hosoda, M., Stone‐Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003). The Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Job-Related Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies. Personnel Psychology, 56, 431-462.[CrossRef] 
[16] Jones, A. L., & Kramer, R. S. S. (2016). Facial Cosmetics and Attractiveness: Comparing the Effect Sizes of Professionally-Applied Cosmetics and Identity. PLOS ONE, 11, e0164218.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Jones, A. L., Kramer, R. S. S., & Ward, R. (2014). Miscalibrations in Judgements of Attractiveness with Cosmetics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2060-2068.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Klatt, J., Eimler, S. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Makeup Your Mind: The Impact of Styling on Perceived Competence and Warmth of Female Leaders. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156, 483-497.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Kuljian, O. R., & Hohman, Z. P. (2022). Warmth, Competence, and Subtle Dehumanization: Comparing Clustering Patterns of Warmth and Competence with Animalistic and Mechanistic Dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62, 181-196.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Loughnan, S., Baldissarri, C., Spaccatini, F., & Elder, L. (2017). Internalizing Objectification: Objectified Individuals See Themselves as Less Warm, Competent, Moral, and Human. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 217-232.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., & Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification Leads to Depersonalization: The Denial of Mind and Moral Concern to Objectified Others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709-717.[CrossRef] 
[22] Ma, J., Yang, B., Luo, R., & Ding, X. (2019). Development of a Facial‐Expression Database of Chinese Han, Hui and Tibetan People. International Journal of Psychology, 55, 456-464.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Mittal, S., & Silvera, D. H. (2020). Makeup or Mask: Makeup’s Effect on Salesperson Trustworthiness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37, 271-277.[CrossRef] 
[24] Morris, K. L., Goldenberg, J., & Boyd, P. (2018). Women as Animals, Women as Objects: Evidence for Two Forms of Objectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1302-1314.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Nash, R., Fieldman, G., Hussey, T., Lévêque, J., & Pineau, P. (2010). Cosmetics: They Influence More than Caucasian Female Facial Attractiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 493-504.[CrossRef] 
[26] Roylance, C., Routledge, C., & Balas, B. (2017). Treating Objects Like Women: The Impact of Terror Management and Objectification on the Perception of Women’s Faces. Sex Roles, 77, 593-603.[CrossRef] 
[27] Savage, R. (2013). Modern Genocidal Dehumanization: A New Model. Patterns of Prejudice, 47, 139-161.[CrossRef] 
[28] Schneider, Z., & Moroń, M. (2022). Facial Makeup and Perceived Likelihood of Influence Tactics Use among Women: A Role of Attractiveness Attributed to Faces with and without Makeup. Current Psychology, 42, 22564-22575.[CrossRef] 
[29] Smith, D. L. (2011). Less than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others. St. Martin’s Griffin.
[30] Sokolova, K., Kefi, H., & Dutot, V. (2022). Beyond the Shallows of Physical Attractiveness: Perfection and Objectifying Gaze on Instagram. International Journal of Information Management, 67, Article ID: 102546.[CrossRef] 
[31] Tagai, K., Ohtaka, H., & Nittono, H. (2016). Faces with Light Makeup Are Better Recognized than Faces with Heavy Makeup. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 226.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Vendemia, M. A., & Fox, J. (2024). How Social Media Images of Sexualized Young Women Elicit Appearance Commentary from Their Peers and Reinforce Objectification. Body Image, 49, Article ID: 101683.[CrossRef] [PubMed]