法律应对个性化推荐算法隐私侵蚀的路径转向
A Shift in Legal Approaches to Privacy Erosion by Personalized Recommendation Algorithms
摘要: 面对个性化推荐算法对隐私的系统性、持续性侵蚀,传统以“用户知情同意”为核心的前端、静态法律框架已然失效。法律应对的路径必须实现根本性转向:从事后救济、形式合规,转向以“算法问责”为核心,通过强制性的算法审计、持续的风险评估与透明的信息披露,构建一个动态、过程化、以规制算法系统本身为重心的新型治理范式。
Abstract: Faced with the systematic and persistent erosion of privacy by personalized recommendation algorithms, the traditional front-end, static legal framework centered on “user-informed consent” has become ineffective. The legal response must undergo a fundamental shift: from post-remedy and formal compliance to a new governance paradigm centered on “algorithmic accountability”, which involves mandatory algorithmic audits, continuous risk assessments, and transparent information disclosure, aiming to build a dynamic, procedural governance paradigm that focuses on regulating the algorithm system itself.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
谢永江, 杨永兴, 刘涛. 个性化推荐算法的法律风险规制[J]. 北京科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 40(1): 77-85.
|
|
[2]
|
王莹. 算法侵害责任框架刍议[J]. 中国法学, 2022(3): 165-184.
|
|
[3]
|
马新彦, 黄舜. 论知情同意在个人信息保护规范中的属性[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2024, 64(5): 85-98+237.
|
|
[4]
|
张欣, 宋雨鑫. 算法审计的制度逻辑和本土化构建[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 55(6): 33-42.
|
|
[5]
|
曾雄, 梁正, 张辉. 中国人工智能风险治理体系构建与基于风险规制模式的理论阐述——以生成式人工智能为例[J]. 国际经济评论, 2025(4): 131-152+7.
|
|
[6]
|
杨帆. 信用评分算法治理: 算法规制与产品责任的融通[J]. 电子政务, 2022(11): 28-39.
|