行政复议制度的功能定位
Functional Orientation of the Administrative Reconsideration System
摘要: 本文围绕行政复议制度的功能定位展开研究,梳理了内部监督说等理论观点,提出在全面推进依法治国背景下,应将“解决行政争议”确立为行政复议的主要功能。本文反思了我国曾以“化解行政争议的主渠道”为目标的定位在实践中暴露的主观愿景与客观现实的矛盾,指出行政复议正从“主渠道”向“实质性解决争议”转型。该转型基于历史逻辑、制度逻辑、发展逻辑和理论逻辑,需通过立法目标重构与制度创新实现,以推动行政复议制度实现“质的提升”,为法治中国建设提供制度支撑。
Abstract: This paper conducts a study centering on the functional orientation of the administrative reconsideration system, sorts out theoretical perspectives such as the internal supervision theory, and proposes that against the backdrop of comprehensively advancing the rule of law, “resolving administrative disputes” should be established as the primary function of administrative reconsideration. The paper reflects on the contradiction between subjective aspirations and objective reality exposed in practice, which arose from China’s previous positioning of administrative reconsideration as “the main channel for resolving administrative disputes”. It points out that administrative reconsideration is undergoing a transformation from “the main channel” to “substantive dispute resolution”. Rooted in historical, institutional, developmental and theoretical logics, this transformation needs to be realized through the reconstruction of legislative objectives and institutional innovation, so as to promote the qualitative improvement of the administrative reconsideration system and provide institutional support for the construction of a law-based China.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王万华. “实质性解决行政争议”的两种模式及其应用[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 43(6): 84-94.
|
|
[2]
|
练育强. 功能与结构视野下的行政复议制度变革[J]. 法学, 2021(6): 43-56.
|
|
[3]
|
张焕光, 胡建淼. 行政法学原理[M]. 北京: 劳动人事出版社, 1989: 454.
|
|
[4]
|
宋雅芳. 行政复议法通论[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 1999: 53.
|
|
[5]
|
姜明安. 建构和完善兼具解纷、救济和监督优势的行政复议制度[J]. 法学杂志, 2023, 44(4): 20-32.
|
|
[6]
|
解志勇. 行政诉讼撤诉: 问题与对策[J]. 行政法学研究, 2010(2): 37-43.
|
|
[7]
|
叶必丰. 行政复议前置设定的法治实践[J]. 法学评论, 2024, 42(1): 123-135.
|
|
[8]
|
孙运山. 关于改革完善行政复议制度的几点思考[J]. 中国司法, 2020(2): 61-65.
|
|
[9]
|
周佑勇. 行政复议的主渠道作用及其制度选择[J]. 法学, 2021(6): 17-29.
|
|
[10]
|
王万华. “化解行政争议的主渠道”定位与行政复议制度完善[J]. 法商研究, 2021, 38(5): 19-32.
|
|
[11]
|
Brian, T. and Michael, G. (2017) Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law. Oxford University Press, 681-682.
|
|
[12]
|
叶必丰. 行政复议机关的法律定位[J]. 法学, 2021(5): 34-46.
|
|
[13]
|
方军. 论行政复议的性质界定与功能定位——兼议我国行政复议立法宗旨的变动[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2020, 35(6): 10-18.
|
|
[14]
|
程斌. 行政复议调解可诉性的误解及其修正[J]. 新余学院学报, 2022, 27(1): 102-109.
|
|
[15]
|
邓佑文. 行政复议调解的现实困境、功能定位与制度优化[J]. 中国行政管理, 2023(1): 29-35.
|