环境保护税对区域绿色转型的影响机制研究
Research on the Impact Mechanisms of the Environmental Protection Tax on Regional Green Transformation
摘要: 环境保护税在减少环境破坏的同时促进经济质量提升,是实现“双碳”目标的重要政策工具。基于2007~2023年中国地级市面板数据,本文采用双重差分模型识别环境保护税对绿色全要素生产率的政策效应及其作用机制。研究发现,环境保护税显著促进了城市绿色转型,但其效果存在明显的异质性:在西部地区、资源型城市和外围城市中促进效应更为突出,而在东部地区、非资源型城市及中心城市中作用不显著。进一步分析揭示,环境保护税通过强化地方政府环境规制执行、引导绿色金融资源配置以及激励政府增加科技支出三大渠道推动绿色转型。本研究为因地制宜制定环境经济政策、实现全域协同绿色转型提供了重要的实证依据与政策启示。
Abstract: As a vital policy instrument for achieving the “Dual Carbon” goals, the Environmental Protection Tax (EPT) plays a key role in mitigating environmental degradation while enhancing economic quality. Utilizing panel data from 284 prefecture-level cities in China spanning the period from 2007 to 2023, this study employs a Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to identify the policy effects of the EPT on Green Total Factor Productivity (GTFP) and explore the underlying transmission mechanisms. The empirical results indicate that the EPT significantly fosters urban green transformation. However, substantial heterogeneity exists regarding its effectiveness: the promotional effect is most pronounced in western regions, resource-based cities, and peripheral cities, whereas it appears less significant in eastern regions, non-resource-based cities, and central cities. Further mechanism analysis reveals that the EPT drives green transformation through three distinct channels: strengthening the enforcement of local government environmental regulations, optimizing the allocation of green financial resources, and incentivizing government expenditure on science and technology. These findings provide valuable empirical evidence and policy implications for tailoring environmental economic policies to local conditions and achieving coordinated regional green transformation.
文章引用:李鑫. 环境保护税对区域绿色转型的影响机制研究[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(1): 224-235. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.161028

参考文献

[1] Pigou, A.C. (1920) The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan.
[2] 曹越, 唐奕可, 辛红霞. “环保费改税”提高了重污染企业全要素生产率吗? [J]. 审计与经济研究, 2022, 37(5): 95-106.
[3] 白瑜. 环保费改税对企业创新质量的影响——基于上市公司面板数据的经验研究[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2024, 40(5): 96-108.
[4] 闫浩, 马金华. 环保税的有效性分析: 作用机制和异质性探讨[J]. 经济问题, 2023(10): 60-69.
[5] 郭晓旭, 张娆. “环保费改税”政策发挥了信号传递效应吗?——来自企业绿色治理的证据[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2024, 44(5): 79-94.
[6] Yu, Y., Liu, J. and Wang, Q. (2024) Has Environmental Protection Tax Reform Promoted Green Transformation of Enterprises? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 29472-29496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Shen, Y. and Zhang, X. (2022) Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Article 16749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 康莹, 严成樑. 环境规制与绿色转型: 基于绿色财税视角的分析[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2024(1): 29-46.
[9] 陈晓珊, 陈欣仪, 李链娜, 等. “双碳”背景下环保税对企业绿色转型影响实证研究[J]. 管理现代化, 2022, 42(6): 121-128.
[10] 陈兆楠, 王郁蓉. 环保税政策对企业可持续发展绩效的影响研究[J]. 西部金融, 2024(9): 75-83.
[11] Liu, X., Ren, F., Sun, F. and Yuan, X. (2024) Green Transformation and Performance Synergy Efficiency of China’s Thermal Power Enterprises on the Basis of the Environmental Tax Burden. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 19358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 韦东明, 顾乃华. 城市低碳治理与绿色经济增长——基于低碳城市试点政策的准自然实验[J]. 当代经济科学, 2021, 43(4): 90-103.
[13] 张建鹏, 陈诗一. 金融发展、环境规制与经济绿色转型[J]. 财经研究, 2021, 47(11): 78-93.
[14] 刘华珂, 何春. 绿色金融促进城市经济高质量发展的机制与检验——来自中国272个地级市的经验证据[J]. 投资研究, 2021, 40(7): 37-52.
[15] 周波, 杨李路, 李冀宁. 我国环境保护税开征显著改善环境质量了吗——基于地市级城市环境指标的实证分析[J]. 税务研究, 2022(11): 59-65.
[16] 史丹, 李少林. 排污权交易制度与能源利用效率——对地级及以上城市的测度与实证[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(9): 5-23.
[17] 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120.
[18] 刘亦文, 邓楠. 环境保护税是否有效释放了四重红利效应? [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2023, 33(10): 35-46.
[19] 房景, 姚树洁, 冯根福, 等. 交通基础设施能否促进消费市场发展——来自中国高铁的经验证据[J]. 南开经济研究, 2023(9): 55-74.