基于生成式人工智能的火山喷发科学插画设计——三维可视化科学图像建构与优化
Generative AI-Based Scientific Illustration Design for Volcanic Eruptions—Construction and Optimization of 3D Visualized Scientific Imagery
DOI: 10.12677/ces.2026.141014, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈弘正*:黄冈师范学院机电与智能制造学院,湖北 黄冈;京都大学防灾研究所,日本 京都;陈泰一:京都大学防灾研究所,日本 京都;河南理工大学资源环境学院,河南 焦作;付玲珊:荆州开发区高级中学,湖北 荆州;陈中文:黄冈师范学院教育学院,湖北 黄冈
关键词: 火山喷发三维剖面生成式人工智能提示词优化语意链设计地球科学可视化3D Volcanic Eruption Cross-Section Generative AI Prompt Optimization Semantic Chaining Design Geoscience Visualization
摘要: 火山喷发是一种剧烈且高度结构化的地球内部物质快速释放的现象,其多层次的动力过程与快速演化特性,对科学图像的准确再现提出了严峻挑战。传统火山演化模型图多依赖手绘或静态示意,难以兼顾三维结构的物理一致性与视觉表达力。本研究提出一种由语言驱动的图像生成策略,结合GPT-4o的语意理解与Midjourney的跨模态图像生成能力,设计出具备语意链推导与多轮优化的提示词工作流,逐步强化火山喷发图像的结构真实性与动态逻辑。研究透过五组图像版本的时空演化比对,对应提示词语意的层层建构,提出一套可追踪、可控且具教育潜力的科学图像生成流程。结果显示,当语意设计越贴近地质术语与物理因果链时,生成图像的解释力与教学适用性大幅提升。本研究展示了大语言模型在地球科学可视化中的知识转译潜力,并为未来AI辅助科普图像建构开启新的可能性。
Abstract: Volcanic eruptions are characterized by the violent and highly structured rapid release of Earth’s internal matter. The multi-level dynamic processes and rapid evolutionary nature of these events pose a significant challenge to accurate scientific visualization. Traditional cross-section diagrams often fall short in capturing the three-dimensional complexity and causal dynamics required for educational use. This study introduces a language-to-visualization workflow that integrates the semantic reasoning of GPT-4o with the cross-modal image synthesis capabilities of Midjourney. We designed a prompt workflow incorporating semantic chain deduction and iterative optimization to progressively reinforce the structural authenticity and dynamic logic of volcanic eruption imagery. By comparing the spatiotemporal evolution of five sets of image versions, corresponding to the layered construction of prompt semantics, we establish a traceable, controllable, and pedagogically valuable framework for scientific image generation. Results indicate that when prompt semantics are closely aligned with geological terminology and physical causal chains, the explanatory power and educational applicability of the generated images are significantly enhanced. This study demonstrates the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in knowledge translation for geoscience visualization, opening new avenues for future AI-assisted construction of popular science imagery.
文章引用:陈弘正, 陈泰一, 付玲珊, 陈中文. 基于生成式人工智能的火山喷发科学插画设计——三维可视化科学图像建构与优化[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(1): 100-108. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.141014

参考文献

[1] 陈亚恒, 刘会玲, 闫丰. 地质学基础课程教学五育并举的探索与实践[J]. 林区教学, 2025(9): 79-83.
[2] Dingwell, D.B. (1998) Magma Degassing and Fragmentation: Recent Experimental Advances. In: From Magma to TephraModelling Physical Processes of Explosive Volcanic Eruptions, Elsevier, 1-23.
[3] 孙先达, 王璞珺, 索丽敏, 等. 松辽盆地火山岩储层三维可视化描述[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2007(6): 1272-1278.
[4] 李百寿, 秦其明, 邢立新, 等. 基于3DS MAX的火山地质景观三维建模与动态模拟研究[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2008(3): 421-428.
[5] Chen, H. (2023) Harnessing AI for Scientific Illustration: Exploring Tornado Dynamics through Midjourney. 2023 12th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST), Taichung, 9-11 November 2023, 136-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Zhang, Z., Deng, Y., Xu, Y. and Li, X. (2024) A Translithospheric Magmatic System Revealed beneath Changbaishan Volcano. Geology, 52, 742-746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Zhu, Y., Bardeen, C.G., Tilmes, S., Mills, M.J., Wang, X., Harvey, V.L., et al. (2022) Perturbations in Stratospheric Aerosol Evolution Due to the Water-Rich Plume of the 2022 Hunga-Tonga Eruption. Communications Earth & Environment, 3, Article No. 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Carr, J.L., Horváth, Á., Wu, D.L. and Friberg, M.D. (2022) Stereo Plume Height and Motion Retrievals for the Record‐setting Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha’apai Eruption of 15 January 2022. Geophysical Research Letters, 49, 1-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 冯晶晶, 赵勇伟, 李霓, 等. 琼北晚第四纪火山锥体形貌与喷发机制[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1107-1127.
[10] 王耀平. “打开的火山教科书”——五大连池[J]. 地理教学, 2024(21): 2, 65.
[11] 刘嘉麒, 郭正府, 刘强. 火山灾害与监测[J]. 第四纪研究, 1999(5): 414-422.
[12] Zuccarello, F., Andronico, D., Del Carlo, P., de’ Michieli Vitturi, M., Di Roberto, A., Ganci, G., et al. (2025) Trigger Mechanism and Propagation Dynamics of Pyroclastic Density Currents at Basaltic Volcanoes. Communications Earth & Environment, 6, Article No. 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Arzilli, F., La Spina, G., Burton, M.R., Polacci, M., Le Gall, N., Hartley, M.E., et al. (2019) Magma Fragmentation in Highly Explosive Basaltic Eruptions Induced by Rapid Crystallization. Nature Geoscience, 12, 1023-1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Kubota, T., Saito, T. and Nishida, K. (2022) Global Fast-Traveling Tsunamis Driven by Atmospheric Lamb Waves on the 2022 Tonga Eruption. Science, 377, 91-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Zhou, X., Kuiper, K., Wijbrans, J. and Vroon, P. (2022) Parameters Controlling the Eruption Frequency of Long‐Lived Felsic Magmatic Systems: An Example from the Milos Volcanic Field (Greece). Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 23, 1-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Dalal, P., Kundu, B., Panda, J. and Jin, S. (2023) Atmospheric Lamb Wave Pulse and Volcanic Explosivity Index Following the 2022 Hunga Tonga (South Pacific) Eruption. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, Article ID: 931545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Chen, H. (2025) Harnessing AI for Scientific Illustration: Exploring Tropical Cyclone Dynamics Using ChatGPT and Midjourney. 2025 IEEE International Conference on Computation, Big-Data and Engineering (ICCBE), Penang, 27-29 June 2025, 568-573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef