互联网回收下考虑消费者情感依恋的电子产品以旧换新策略
Trade-In Strategy for Electronic Products Considering Consumers’ Emotional Attachment in Internet-Based Recycling
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.14124616, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王 倩*:南京交通职业技术学院运输管理学院,江苏 南京;钟永光:青岛大学商学院,山东 青岛
关键词: 电子产品互联网回收以旧换新消费者情感Electronic Products Internet Recycling Trade-In Consumer Emotion
摘要: 消费者对旧产品存在情感依恋,给以旧换新策略带来新的挑战。本文在互联网回收背景下,考虑消费者情感依恋的电子产品以旧换新策略选择问题,构建主从对策博弈模型,对比分析品牌商实施与电商平台实施以旧换新策略的均衡结果。研究发现:在回收价值相近且情感依恋极端时,双方易陷入策略竞争;而在回收价值差异显著、情感依恋适中且旧产品消费者占比较高时,供应链双方将达到双赢状态。此外,旧产品消费者占比对策略选择具有关键调节作用,其占比越大越能避免“囚徒困境”。本研究将为互联网环境下企业制定差异化以旧换新策略提供理论依据与管理启示,也将为政府推动循环经济与绿色消费政策提供决策参考。
Abstract: Consumers’ emotional attachment to their used products poses new challenges for the design of trade-in strategies. Against the backdrop of Internet recycling, this paper investigates the selection of trade-in strategies for electronic products, considering consumer emotional attachment. A Stackelberg game model is constructed to systematically compare the equilibrium outcomes of two trade-in strategies: manufacturer-implemented and e-platform-implemented. The study finds that when the recycling values are similar and emotional attachment is extreme, both parties easily fall into strategic competition. In contrast, when the recycling values differ significantly, emotional attachment is moderate, and the proportion of installed-base consumers is relatively high, supply chain coordination and win-win outcomes are more likely. Furthermore, the proportion of installed-base consumers plays a key moderating role in strategy selection, as its increase helps narrow the “prisoner’s dilemma” interval. This research provides a theoretical basis and managerial insights for enterprises to formulate differentiated trade-in strategies in the Internet environment, and also offers decision-making references for the government to promote circular economy and green consumption policies.
文章引用:王倩, 钟永光. 互联网回收下考虑消费者情感依恋的电子产品以旧换新策略[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 6318-6325. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14124616

参考文献

[1] 刘婷婷, 朱坤, 温志超, 等. 废弃电器电子产品互联网回收发展趋势与挑战[J]. 环境保护, 2023, 51(8): 66-71.
[2] Wang, L., Zeng, X. and Turson, R. (2025) How Does Emotional Attachment Impact Mobile Phone Recycling Intention? Emotional Process and Contingencies. Journal of Environmental Management, 380, Article ID: 125038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 肖平, 冯静静. “以旧换新”促进消费和投资良性循环: 理论逻辑、历史经验和政策路径[J]. 财经科学, 2024(6): 87-100.
[4] 王方, 尹雪薇, 余乐安. 政府监管下信息敏感型WEEE双渠道回收策略研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2024, 44(8): 2592-2604.
[5] Yao, F., Wang, Y., Yan, Y. and Liu, S. (2023) Manufacturer’s Online Recycling Channel Intrusion Strategies Considering Digital Technology Enabling and Government Subsidies. Managerial and Decision Economics, 45, 1043-1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 王竟竟, 许民利. 回收目标责任制下闭环供应链的定价及以旧换新策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(11): 298-311.
[7] Liu, Q., Dong, J., Liu, Y. and Yang, L. (2025) Joint Location and Pricing for Recycling Service Planning. Computers & Operations Research, 182, Article ID: 107114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 王竟竟, 许民利. 考虑消费者损失规避行为的“互联网+”回收平台定价决策研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2022, 36(6): 106-116.
[9] 张晓青, 苑希港, 陈佳佳, 等. 考虑消费者隐私顾虑的消费品以旧换新定价策略研究[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-18. 2025-11-24.[CrossRef
[10] 景熠, 张闻秋, 曹柳. 电商购物平台与回收平台的“以旧换新”合作策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 289-297.
[11] Bai, X., Choi, T., Li, Y. and Sun, X. (2023) Implementing Trade‐In Programs in the Presence of Resale Platforms: Mode Selection and Pricing. Production and Operations Management, 32, 3193-3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R.H. (1990) Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325-1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Bruner, J., Calegari, F. and Handfield, T. (2020) The Evolution of the Endowment Effect. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41, 87-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Yan, J., Xia, S., Jiang, A. and Lin, Z. (2024) The Effect of Different Types of Virtual Influencers on Consumers’ Emotional Attachment. Journal of Business Research, 177, Article ID: 114646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef