供应链大股东持股、供应链数字化与企业ESG表现
Shareholding of Major Shareholders in Supply Chain, Supply Chain Digitalization and Enterprise ESG Performance
摘要: 伴随着我国双碳政策持续推进,社会各界对绿色发展和社会责任理念的关注日益增强。因此本文利用2009~2023年中国A股上市公司数据,基于供应链关系的协同效应,实证研究供应链大股东持股对企业ESG表现的影响及作用机制。研究结果显示:第一,供应链大股东持股会促进企业ESG表现,在经过稳健性检验后,结果依旧显著。第二,供应链数字化可以增强供应链大股东持股对企业ESG表现的促进作用;第三,供应链大股东持股通过增强管理者监督和降低融资约束从而促进企业ESG表现;第四,该促进作用在高市场竞争强度和企业议价能力高中的企业样本更为显著。本文研究结论为构建稳定的供应链关系和优化上市公司融资结构提供理论支撑。
Abstract: With the continuous promotion of China’s dual carbon policy, all sectors of society are paying increasing attention to the concept of green development and social responsibility. Therefore, this paper uses the data of China’s A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2023, and based on the synergistic effect of supply chain relationship, empirically studies the impact and mechanism of the shareholding of major shareholders in supply chain on the ESG performance of enterprises. The results show that: first, the ownership of major shareholders in the supply chain will promote the ESG performance of enterprises, and the results are still significant after the robustness test. Secondly, the digitalization of supply chain can enhance the promotion effect of the shareholding of supply chain major shareholders on the ESG performance of enterprises. Thirdly, the shareholding of major shareholders in supply chain promotes ESG performance by enhancing managers’ supervision and reducing financing constraints. Fourthly, the promotion effect is more significant in the enterprise samples with high market competition intensity and high bargaining power. The conclusion of this paper provides theoretical support for building a stable supply chain relationship and optimizing the financing structure of listed companies.
文章引用:陈心丽. 供应链大股东持股、供应链数字化与企业ESG表现[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 6449-6460. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14124634

参考文献

[1] 毛涛, 扶亚兰. 绿色供应链管理协同减污降碳研究[J]. 环境保护, 2024, 52(7): 9-12.
[2] 张冰晔, 刘紫琦, 周君, 等. 供应链集中度对中国上市企业ESG表现的影响分析——基于企业经营视角[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2024, 44(6): 1795-1814.
[3] 贾勇, 闫洁. “亲上加亲”的供应商关系能提升公司业绩吗? [J]. 杭州电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 16(2): 15-22.
[4] Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1979) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. In: Brunner, K., Ed., Rochester Studies in Economics and Policy Issues, Springer, 163-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 窦欢, 陆正飞. 大股东控制、关联存款与现金持有价值[J]. 管理世界, 2016(5): 141-150+167.
[6] Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C. (1983) Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1997) A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52, Article 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] DasGupta, R. (2022) Financial Performance Shortfall, ESG Controversies, and ESG Performance: Evidence from Firms around the World. Finance Research Letters, 46, Article 102487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 曹廷求, 刘呼声. 大股东治理与公司治理效率[J]. 改革, 2003(1): 33-37.
[10] 魏延鹏, 毛志宏, 王浩宇. 国有资本参股对民营企业ESG表现的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2023, 20(7): 984-993.
[11] 蒋殿春, 鲁大宇. 供应链关系变动、融资约束与企业创新[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(10): 56-74.
[12] 陈克兢, 康艳玲, 万清清, 等. 外部大股东能促进企业创新吗——基于退出威胁视角的实证分析[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021, 24(3): 202-214.
[13] 王迪, 刘祖基, 赵泽朋. 供应链关系与银行借款——基于供应商/客户集中度的分析[J]. 会计研究, 2016(10): 42-49+96.
[14] 肖红军, 沈洪涛, 周艳坤. 客户企业数字化、供应商企业ESG表现与供应链可持续发展[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(3): 54-73.
[15] Shen, B., Choi, T. and Minner, S. (2019) A Review on Supply Chain Contracting with Information Considerations: Information Updating and Information Asymmetry. International Journal of Production Research, 57, 4898-4936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 李瑞茜. 管理层激励对企业数字化转型的影响研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2023(5): 47-52.
[17] Vosooghidizaji, M., Taghipour, A. and Canel-Depitre, B. (2020) Supply Chain Coordination under Information Asymmetry: A Review. International Journal of Production Research, 58, 1805-1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 胡海峰, 白宗航, 王爱萍. 供应链持股与企业高质量发展——基于全要素生产率视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024(9): 137-155.
[19] 姜丽莎, 康湧清, 邓伟. 大股东控制权、外部监督层次与企业ESG表现[J]. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(5): 38-56.
[20] 史金艳, 杨健亨, 李延喜, 等. 牵一发而动全身: 供应网络位置、经营风险与公司绩效[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(9): 136-154.
[21] 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120.
[22] 廖璇. ESG表现、市场势力与企业价值链升级——基于中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2024, 31(1): 51-67.
[23] 张新民, 王珏, 祝继高. 市场地位、商业信用与企业经营性融资[J]. 会计研究, 2012(8): 58-65+97.