多模态交互下区域认同隐私授权边界研究
Research on the Boundaries of Privacy Authorization in Regional Identity Perception under Multimodal Interaction
DOI: 10.12677/isl.2026.101038, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 代雨宏:四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地–文旅融合发展研究中心,四川 成都;罗 枫*:四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地–文旅融合发展研究中心,四川 成都;四川旅游学院经济管理学院,四川 成都;陈治豫:四川旅游学院外国语学院,四川 成都
关键词: 多模态生物特征效用–风险权衡群体认同区域认同度隐私授权Multimodal Biometrics Utility-Risk Trade-Off Group Identity Regional Identity Privacy Authorization
摘要: 在成渝地区双城经济圈与巴蜀文旅走廊智能化转型背景下,多模态生物识别技术广泛应用于文旅服务,引发用户隐私授权决策的复杂性。本文构建“效用–风险–认同”三维整合模型,结合单模态与多模态实验,探究用户隐私授权机制,并重点考察“区域政策感知”与“跨城服务认同”的调节作用。研究发现:效用感知显著促进授权,风险感知显著抑制授权;区域认同在二者间发挥系统性调节作用,多模态场景下用户风险容忍阈值显著降低。研究推动了隐私决策理论从“态度–行为”向“行为–认同”框架演进,并为智慧文旅场景的梯度授权与区域数据治理提供实证依据。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the Chengdu-Chongqing economic zone construction and the intelligent transformation of the Ba-Shu Cultural Tourism Corridor, multimodal biometric technology is widely deployed in cultural tourism services, raising complex issues in users’ privacy authorization decisions. This study constructs a three-dimensional “Utility - Risk - Identity” integrated model and employs both unimodal and multimodal experimental designs to investigate users’ privacy authorization mechanisms, with a specific focus on the moderating roles of “Regional Policy Perception” and “Cross-City Service Identity”. The findings reveal that utility perception significantly promotes authorization, whereas risk perception significantly inhibits it. Regional identity plays a systematic moderating role between the two, and users’ risk tolerance threshold decreases notably in multimodal scenarios. This research advances privacy decision theory from an “attitude - behavior” framework toward a “behavior - identity” framework, providing empirical support for the design of graded authorization mechanisms and regional governance in smart tourism contexts.
文章引用:代雨宏, 罗枫, 陈治豫. 多模态交互下区域认同隐私授权边界研究[J]. 交叉科学快报, 2026, 10(1): 299-312. https://doi.org/10.12677/isl.2026.101038

参考文献

[1] MIT Research Team (2024) The Privacy Paradox in High-Frequency Scenarios. MIT Press.
[2] Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L. and Loewenstein, G. (2015) Privacy and Human Behavior in the Age of Information. Science, 347, 509-514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Harvard Business Review (2023) AR and Biometric Fusion in Theme Parks: A Case Study of Disney. Harvard Business Review, 101, 88-95.
[4] Cambridge University Research Team (2024) Neural Correlates of Privacy Risk Perception in Data Authorization Contexts. Patterns, 5, 100-115.
[5] NIST (2023) Biometric Performance Testing and Reporting. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[6] Reuel, A. (2024) Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024: Responsible AI. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI (HAI).
[7] Zomaya, A.Y. (2023) ACM Computing Surveys, Volume 55 (Issues 1-12). Association for Computing Machinery.
[8] Hofstede, G. (1984) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage.
[9] Dinev, T. and Hart, P. (2006) An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions. Information Systems Research, 17, 61-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Zhang, X., Guo, X. and Lai, K.H. (2017) How Does Social Interaction Affect Users’ Continuance Intention in Social Commerce? Internet Research, 27, 432-450.
[11] Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J. and Hart, P. (2011) Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 798-824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 重庆市综合经济研究院, 四川省经济和社会发展研究院, 四川省县域经济研究中心. 成渝地区双城经济圈一体化发展指数报告(2022-2023) [M]. 北京: 中国经济出版社, 2024.
[13] 王苹. 成渝地区双城经济圈文化旅游一体化发展研究[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2021.
[14] 彭璐珞, 陈晔, 张梦. 中国地域文化消费特征的实证研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2015, 30(5): 45-56.
[15] 陈晔, 彭璐珞. 巴蜀文化特质与消费行为研究[J]. 中国文化产业评论, 2021(2): 77-85.
[16] 张梦, 彭璐珞. 地域文化对技术接受的影响机制[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(4): 155-165.
[17] Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Ding, S., Zhang, P., Xu, L., Liu, C., et al. (2023) Scaling Aligned Carbon Nanotube Transistors to a Sub-10 nm Node. Nature Electronics, 6, 506-515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Collis, A., Moehring, A., Sen, A. and Acquisti, A. (2022) Information Frictions and Heterogeneity in Valuations of Personal Data. Science, 376, 795-798.
[19] Li, Y., He, Z., Li, Y., Huang, T. and Liu, Z. (2023) Keep It Real: Assessing Destination Image Congruence and Its Impact on Tourist Experience Evaluations. Tourism Management, 97, Article ID: 104736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Stanford & MIT Joint Research (2024) Personalized Recommendation Accuracy and User Data Authorization. Nature Electronics, 7, 145-152.
[21] 中国互联网信息中心. 2024年中国旅游智能设备消费者概况报告[R]. 北京: 中国互联网络信息中心, 2024.
[22] Smith, H.J., Milberg, S.J. and Burke, S.J. (2020) Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals’ Concerns about Organizational Practices. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 1027-1056.
[23] Rajimehr, R., Desimone, R. and Duncan, J. (2024) A Comprehensive Map of the Cerebral Cortex Networks in Humans. Neuron, 112, 3622-3636.e8.
[24] Zhao, L., Lu, Y. and Gupta, S. (2022) Sharing with Friends versus Strangers: How Interpersonal Relationships Influence Privacy Calculus in Social Commerce. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 1-24.
[25] 刘茂才, 谭继和. 巴蜀文化的历史特征与四川特色文化的构建[J]. 西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2003(1): 57-59.
[26] 徐中舒. 巴蜀文化初论[J]. 四川大学学报(社会科学版), 1959(2): 21-44.
[27] 刘静艳, 张梦. 文化适应性在旅游技术接受中的调节作用[J]. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(3): 45-57.