笛卡尔知识确定性理论的微观解构与当代价值
Microscopic Deconstruction and Contemporary Value of Descartes’ Theory of Knowledge Certainty
摘要: “知识的确定性”也就是知识的普遍必然性和稳定性。笛卡尔从“普遍怀疑”出发剔除所有不确定的东西,从而寻找真正具有确定性的存在。在这一过程中,笛卡尔对“知识确定性”进行了思考,他以“我思故我在”这一命题为出发点,运用“直观”和“演绎”的方法重新构建起以理性为基础的人类知识体系,同时他将自由意志与理性结合起来,引导个体通过理性的自我治理,获得心灵的宁静。这一目的贯穿于其哲学的整体框架,并超越了纯粹的认识论范畴,具有深远的当代启示意义。
Abstract: The “certainty of knowledge” refers to the universal necessity and stability of knowledge. Descartes began with “universal doubt” to eliminate all uncertainties, thereby seeking truly certain existence. In this process, he reflected on the “certainty of knowledge,” starting from the proposition “I think, therefore I am.” Using the methods of “intuition” and “deduction,” he reconstructed the edifice of human knowledge based on reason. Simultaneously, he combined free will with reason, guiding individuals to achieve mental tranquility through rational self-governance. This objective permeates the entire framework of his philosophy, transcending the purely epistemological realm and carrying profound contemporary relevance.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
笛卡尔. 第一哲学沉思集[M]. 庞景仁, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1986.
|
|
[2]
|
吴增定. 笛卡尔的“普遍怀疑”意味着什么?——从胡塞尔和海德格尔的现象学视野来看[J]. 现代哲学, 2025(1): 71-85.
|
|
[3]
|
笛卡尔. 探求真理的指导原则[M]. 管震湖, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1991.
|
|
[4]
|
笛卡尔. 哲学原理[M]. 关琪桐, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1958.
|
|
[5]
|
笛卡尔. 谈谈方法[M]. 王太庆, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2005.
|
|
[6]
|
叶斌. 再思笛卡尔循环[J]. 现代哲学, 2021(4): 98-103.
|
|
[7]
|
江威. 斯宾诺莎对笛卡尔普遍怀疑的批判[J]. 哲学动态, 2023(2): 81-89.
|
|
[8]
|
贾克防. 笛卡尔自由意志理论的内在融贯性——基于自由意志自发性的视角[J]. 哲学研究, 2025(8): 128-142+175.
|