电商企业财务风险的失衡数据预测研究——基于CSA优化SMOTE与随机森林的融合模型
Study on Predicting E-Commerce Financial Risk from Imbalanced Data—An Integrated Model Based on CSA-Optimized SMOTE and Random Forest
摘要: 鉴于财务风险预测对电子商务行业的发展及电商企业的可持续发展具有极其重要的作用,而现有研究对数据不平衡状态下的预测效果仍存在不足,本文以2020~2024年的电商企业数据为样本开展研究。首先,对比不同采样方式对机器学习分类器效果的影响,确定以SMOTE-RF为基础模型,再引入改进的乌鸦搜索算法(CSA)优化,利用融合模型对数据集进行财务风险预测和分析。实证分析发现,在不平衡数据集上,经乌鸦搜索算法优化后的SMOTE-RF组合分类器整体表现尚可,提高了对少数类的识别效果;在引入改进的CSA后,ICSA-SMOTE-RF模型在保持较高特异度的同时,获得了较高的召回率,对财务风险预测效果有着较大幅度的提升。实证结果表明,本文提出的融合模型能够较好地反映出财务指标之间复杂的非线性关系,为电商企业的风险预测提供了可靠的理论研究方法。
Abstract: In the context of the rapid development of e-commerce industry, financial risk prediction is of great significance to the sustainable development of e-commerce enterprises. However, the existing financial risk prediction research still demonstrates limitations in the prediction effect under the condition of imbalanced data. This study selects e-commerce enterprises from 2020 to 2024 as research subjects. By comparing the effects of different sampling strategies on the performance of machine learning classifiers, SMOTE combined with Random Forest (RF) was determined as the base prediction model. Furthermore, the improved Crow Search Algorithm (CSA) was introduced to optimize model performance, employing a fusion model to predict and analyze financial risks in the dataset. Empirical findings reveal that on imbalanced datasets, the overall performance of the SMOTE-RF combined classifier optimized by the Crow Search Algorithm is acceptable, improving the recognition effect for minority classes. The ICSA-SMOTE-RF model based on improved CSA effectively increases recall while maintaining high specificity, significantly improving financial risk prediction performance. The empirical findings suggest that the proposed hybrid model in this paper effectively captures the complex nonlinear relationships among financial indicators, providing a reliable theoretical and methodological approach for risk prediction in e-commerce enterprises.
文章引用:郭宇新, 刘媛华. 电商企业财务风险的失衡数据预测研究——基于CSA优化SMOTE与随机森林的融合模型[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 6542-6553. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14124644

参考文献

[1] 宋佳. 跨国并购的风险控制分析——以汤臣倍健跨国并购LSG为例[J]. 经营与管理, 2021(1): 18-24.
[2] 胡霞. 数字化转型对电商企业存货管理效率的影响研究[J]. 财会通讯, 2025(12): 44-48.
[3] 刘尚希, 程瑜, 李成威, 等. 以风险视角透视新发展阶段的企业成本特征及我们的建议——2021年企业成本调研总报告[J]. 财政研究, 2022(4): 8-28.
[4] 苏美文, 杨文爽, 李博文, 等. 推动人工智能与实体经济深度融合加快发展新质生产力[J]. 工业技术经济, 2025, 44(4): 32-59.
[5] Li, Q., Cai, D. and Wang, H. (2012) Study on Network Finance Risk on the Basis of Logit Model. In: Tan, H., Ed., Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer, 213-220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Canbas, S., Cabuk, A. and Kilic, S.B. (2005) Prediction of Commercial Bank Failure via Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Financial Structures: The Turkish Case. European Journal of Operational Research, 166, 528-546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 严莉红. 基于LSTM神经网络的饲料企业财务风险预警模型构建[J]. 饲料研究, 2023, 46(3): 130-134.
[8] 李祥飞, 张再生, 刘珊珊. 改进布谷鸟搜索SVM在财务风险评估中的应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2015, 51(23): 218-225.
[9] 向有涛, 王明, 曹琳. 基于多目标深度学习模型的财务风险预测方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(10): 184-188.
[10] 王文雯, 姚欣. 注意力机制结合卷积神经网络的医院财务风险预警方法研究[J]. 现代科学仪器, 2023, 40(2): 166-173.
[11] Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O. and Kegelmeyer, W.P. (2002) SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321-357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 马贺, 宋媚, 祝义. 改进边界分类的Borderline-SMOTE过采样方法[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学), 2023, 59(6): 1003-1012.
[13] 李志强, 余炫朴. 基于ADASYN的跨境电商小微企业信用风险模型优化研究[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 56(2): 118-127.
[14] Cutler, A., Cutler, D.R. and Stevens, J.R. (2012) Random Forests. In: Zhang, C. and Ma, Y. Eds., Ensemble Machine Learning, Springer, 157-175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Askarzadeh, A. (2016) A Novel Metaheuristic Method for Solving Constrained Engineering Optimization Problems: Crow Search Algorithm. Computers & Structures, 169, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef