论表见代理中被代理人可归责性
On the Liability of the Principal in Apparent Agency
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2026.121022, PDF,   
作者: 宋梦瑶:青岛大学法学院,山东 青岛
关键词: 表见代理被代理人可归责性Apparent Agency Principal Imputability
摘要: 表见代理作为代理制度中的一项特殊规定,是对无权代理行为在特定情况下赋予其有权代理法律后果的制度。这一制度在保护善意相对人的信赖利益、维护交易安全等方面发挥着至关重要的作用。随着我国经济的快速发展以及交易方式的不断变化,我国相关法律法规中并未对表见代理制度,尤其是被代理人可归责性方面进行更加详细的规定。这引起了理论界与实务界对被代理人能否作为表见代理的构成要件的激烈争论。为了解决法律适用上的矛盾,确保法律能够更好地服务于实践,本文将从被代理人可归责性的基础概念以及理论与实务界对被代理人可归责性能否作为表见代理的构成要件的争议出发,来展现被代理人可归责性的正当性。并在确保被代理人具备可归责性前提下,进一步分析被代理人可归责性的认定原则以及司法中被代理人具备可归责性的具体情形。旨在通过对被代理人可归责性的价值分析,为我国表见代理制度中被代理人可归责性方面进行适当的补充,同时为被代理人可归责性的理论研究和实务操作提供一些有益的参考。
Abstract: Apparent agency, as a special provision in the agency system, is a system that grants the legal consequences of authorized agency to unauthorized agency acts under specific circumstances. This system plays a crucial role in protecting the reliance interests of good-faith counterparties and maintaining transaction security. With the rapid development of China’s economy and the continuous changes in transaction methods, the relevant laws and regulations in China have not provided more detailed provisions on the system of apparent agency, especially regarding the liability of the principal. This has sparked intense debates in both the theoretical and practical circles over whether the liability of the principal can be a constituent element of apparent agency. To resolve the contradictions in the application of the law and ensure that the law can better serve practice, this paper will start from the basic concept of the liability of the principal and the disputes in the theoretical and practical circles over whether the liability of the principal can be a constituent element of apparent agency, to demonstrate the legitimacy of the liability of the principal. And under the premise of ensuring that the principal is liable, it will further analyze the principles for determining the liability of the principal and the specific circumstances in which the principal is liable in judicial practice. The aim is to provide appropriate supplements to the liability of the principal in China’s system of apparent agency through the value analysis of the liability of the principal, and at the same time offer some useful references for the theoretical research and practical operation of the liability of the principal.
文章引用:宋梦瑶. 论表见代理中被代理人可归责性[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(1): 165-173. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.121022

参考文献

[1] 郑文君. 表见代理中被代理人可归责性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2022: 23.
[2] 吴泽勇. 表见代理的证明责任问题[J]. 现代法学, 2023, 45(5): 22-35.
[3] 吴君蕊. 表见代理中本人可归责性问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2021: 33.
[4] 杜可欣. 表见代理中的本人可归责性初探[J]. 东南大学学报, 2022, 24(S2): 85-88.
[5] 王振. 表见代理中被代理人可归责性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2021: 17.
[6] 于宪会. 日本法研究[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2018: 95-97.
[7] 吴昂津. 表见代理构成要件及司法适用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东财经大学, 2022: 10.
[8] 张新宝. 《中华人民共和国民法典·总则》释义[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2020: 97-98.
[9] 陈钰. 表见代理中被代理人可归责性要件研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海财经大学, 2020: 36.
[10] 余长智, 刘芳芳. 表见代理中代理权外观要件的综合认定[J]. 人民司法, 2020(17): 44-46.
[11] 王利明. 民法总则研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2018: 35-37.
[12] 毕晓焕. 论代理授权行为的有因性[J]. 东南大学学报, 2022, 24(S2): 81-84.
[13] 周志东. 论表见代理的构成要件与证明责任[J]. 苏州大学学报, 2024, 11(4): 65-77.
[14] 魏雨晴. 表见代理中本人可归责问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2020: 21.
[15] 陈甦. 公章抗辩的类型与处理[J]. 法学研究, 2020, 42(3): 39-60.