瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚在腹腔镜胆囊切除术或阑尾切除术中对血流动力学稳定性及苏醒质量的影响比较
Comparison of the Effects of Remimazolam and Propofol on Hemodynamic Stability and Recovery Quality during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy or Appendectomy
摘要: 目的:探讨瑞马唑仑在腹腔镜胆囊切除术或阑尾切除术全身麻醉中的应用效果,并与丙泊酚比较其在血流动力学稳定性、苏醒质量及不良反应发生率方面的差异。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,选取接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术或阑尾切除术的患者作为研究对象,根据麻醉诱导和维持用药不同分为瑞马唑仑组和丙泊酚组,各100例。比较两组患者术中血流动力学指标变化、苏醒时间、拔管时间及不良反应发生情况。结果:与丙泊酚组相比,瑞马唑仑组患者术中血流动力学波动较小,循环稳定性更佳;苏醒时间及拔管时间均明显缩短;术中及术后不良反应发生率显著降低,差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:与丙泊酚相比,瑞马唑仑用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术或阑尾切除术全身麻醉可更有效地维持术中血流动力学稳定,改善苏醒质量,缩短苏醒及拔管时间,并减少不良反应的发生,具有良好的安全性和有效性,尤其适合用于日间腹腔镜手术。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the application effect of remimazolam in general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy or appendectomy, and to compare the differences in hemodynamic stability, recovery quality and incidence of adverse reactions between remimazolam and propofol. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted. Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy or appendectomy were selected as the study subjects and divided into remimazolam group and propofol group according to different drugs for anesthesia induction and maintenance. The changes of hemodynamic indexes, recovery time, extubation time and adverse reactions during operation were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the propofol group, the remimazolam group had smaller hemodynamic fluctuations during the operation and better circulatory stability; the recovery time and extubation time were significantly shortened; the incidence of adverse reactions during and after the operation was significantly reduced, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with propofol, remimazolam used for general anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy or appendectomy can more effectively maintain intraoperative hemodynamic stability, improve the quality of recovery, shorten the recovery and extubation time, and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions. It has good safety and effectiveness, and is especially suitable for day laparoscopic surgery.
文章引用:杨琳, 王飞, 康颖, 费梦楠, 韩文勇. 瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚在腹腔镜胆囊切除术或阑尾切除术中对血流动力学稳定性及苏醒质量的影响比较[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(1): 1754-1760. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.161223

参考文献

[1] Coccolini, F., Catena, F., Pisano, M., Gheza, F., Fagiuoli, S., Di Saverio, S., et al. (2015) Open versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Surgery, 18, 196-204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Singh, S. and Arora, K. (2011) Effect of Oral Clonidine Premedication on Perioperative Haemodynamic Response and Postoperative Analgesic Requirement for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 55, 26-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Tan, H., Lou, A., Wu, J., Chen, X. and Qian, X. (2024) Comparison of Hypotension between Propofol and Remimazolam-Propofol Combinations Sedation for Day-Surgery Hysteroscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. BMC Anesthesiology, 24, Article No. 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Luo, Z., Cao, H., Luo, L., Chen, L., Feng, D. and Huang, G. (2024) Comparison of Remimazolam Tosilate and Propofol during Induction and Maintenance of General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Single Center, Randomized Controlled Trial. BMC Anesthesiology, 24, Article No. 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 刘斌, 朱慧, 席江伟, 等. 不同手术时机下腹腔镜胆囊切除术对老年患者的影响比较[J]. 国际老年医学杂志, 2023, 44(5): 579-582.
[6] 高振山, 陈鹃, 于华. 腹腔镜胆囊切除和传统开放手术治疗急性化脓性胆囊炎的临床效果比较[J]. 南通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(5): 484-486.
[7] 刘壮. 腹腔镜联合纤维胆道镜手术治疗高龄胆总管结石伴胆囊结石患者的效果分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2023, 18(17): 36-38.
[8] 梁碧芯, 陈兴娅, 何巧芳, 等. 手术等待室舒心护理对腹腔镜胆囊切除患者术后心理应激的影响[J]. 河北医药, 2023, 45(17): 2703-2706.
[9] 叶申建, 吕云霄, 王宾. 急性胆囊炎胆囊穿刺引流术后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术时机的研究进展[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2023, 31(04): 317-320.
[10] 王辰萌, 蔡鲍平, 李健, 等. 一期行腹腔镜胆总管探查术加胆囊切除术与传统开放手术的临床疗效对比[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 299-303.
[11] 张小强. 三镜联合分期手术与腹腔镜手术治疗老年胆总管结石合并胆囊结石患者的临床疗效分析[J]. 航空航天医学杂志, 2023, 34(8): 937-939.
[12] Gong, F., Gui, Q., Lan, L., Zhou, G., Wen, Q., Wei, Y., et al. (2025) Comparative Effects of Remimazolam and Propofol on Hemodynamic Stability during Sedation for Painless Gastroscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. BMC Anesthesiology, 25, Article No. 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Gu, J., Liu, Y., Lin, X., Fu, L., Liu, J., Sun, B., et al. (2024) Comparison of Remimazolam-Flumazenil and Propofol on Psychomotor Function and Emergence Following General Anesthesia in Surgical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Drug Design, Development and Therapy, 18, 6447-6457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 胥龙龙, 李富荣, 伏苏. 腹腔镜联合硬质胆道镜微创手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效分析[J]. 甘肃科技, 2023, 39(7): 116-118.
[15] 刘志刚, 王建明, 翟正群, 等. 中重度急性胆囊炎患者经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术后腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术时机[J]. 山东医药, 2023, 63(21): 61-63.
[16] 张晶晶, 王凤玲, 孟祥云, 等. PDCA循环对腹腔镜下胆囊切除术围手术期预防使用抗菌药物的影响效果分析[J]. 中国药房, 2023, 34(13): 1632-1636.
[17] 齐宁. 经胆囊后三角解剖入路腹腔镜手术治疗胆囊结石伴慢性胆囊炎的临床效果观察[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2023, 27(19): 145-147.
[18] Feng, Y., Jia, J., Cheng, Y., Lin, J., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., et al. (2025) Effects of Remimazolam-Propofol with Flumazenil Reversal on the Emergence Time and Hemodynamics of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Partial Hepatectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Drug Design, Development and Therapy, 19, 6777-6787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]