PPP模式中构建预防性行政公益诉讼制度之证成
On the Justification of Constructing a Preventive Administrative Public Interest Litigation System in the PPP Model
摘要: 聪明者事前预防,侥幸者事后补偿。在风险社会,任何机关和个人都无法预测和消解所有潜在风险,这要求必须将思维意识的核心转向未来、侧重预防。为缓解社会赤字压力,PPP模式在促进国家基础设施建设、优化社会资源配置等方面发挥着日益重要的作用。现阶段我国对PPP模式中国家利益和社会公共利益的保护主要依靠PPP模式内部规制,如依赖社会资本方的遵纪守法和道德自律以及行政机关的内部监督,但由于社会资本方以经济利益为最高追求、行政机关存在不作为或违法行政的可能以及缺乏救济程序不完善等因素,PPP模式中国家利益和社会公共利益的保护现状并不乐观。本文立足于PPP模式中国家利益和社会公共利益保护的实践困境,从理论要求和实践需要两个角度进行论证,以风险预防原则、公共利益原则、法治原则为理论基础,回应目标层面、意义层面、制度层面、国际层面在PPP模式中构建预防性行政公益诉讼制度的实践需要,以此表明预防性行政公益诉讼制度在保护PPP模式中国家利益和社会公共利益、促进PPP模式良性运行方面的必要作用。
Abstract: A wise man prevents in advance, a lucky man compensates after. In a risk society, no institution or individual can predict and eliminate all potential risks, which requires us to shift the core of our thinking consciousness to the future and focus on prevention. PPP model is playing an increasingly important role in promoting national infrastructure construction and optimizing the allocation of social resources. For PPP model in our country at present stage national interests and public interests in the field of protection rely mainly on internal regulation, the PPP model should depend on social capital and moral self-discipline, and the administrative organ to adhere to the internal supervision, but because of the social capital for economic interests as the highest pursuit, the administrative organ is not as, or the possibility of illegal administrative factors such as incomplete and lack of relief procedures, The current situation of protecting national interests and social public interests in PPP model is not optimistic. Based on PPP model national interests and social public interests protection in the field of practice, from the angles of theory and practice need to carry on the argument, to risk prevention principle, public interests, the theoretical basis of the basic principles of the rule of law, respond to the target level, significance level, system level and international level in the PPP model need to build a preventive administrative public interest litigation system in the field of practice, This shows that the preventive administrative public interest litigation system plays an essential role in protecting the national interests and social public interests in the PPP model and promoting the benign operation of PPP model.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
戴传利. 政府与社会资本合作监管国际立法模式及启示[J]. 学术界, 2025(6): 199-209.
|
|
[2]
|
胡莹莹. PPP协议公私主体权利(力)配置困境与破解——以控制权为中心[J]. 行政法学研究, 2023(1): 166-176.
|
|
[3]
|
张敏, 汪倩. 风险社会背景下我国预防性行政公益诉讼制度的建构[J]. 金陵科技学院学报, 2021, 35(2): 70-75.
|
|
[4]
|
柴宏琴. 预防性行政公益诉讼制度构建[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学法学院, 2021.
|
|
[5]
|
吴良志. 论预防性环境行政公益诉讼制度的确立与规则建构[J]. 江汉学术, 2021, 40(1): 15-23.
|
|
[6]
|
关博豪. PPP风险分配法律规制的正当性及具体路径[J]. 社会科学战线, 2023(5): 220-234.
|
|
[7]
|
梁鸿飞. 预防性行政公益诉讼: 迈向“过程性规制”的行政法律监督[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 34(4): 84-94.
|
|
[8]
|
张翔. 基本权利的受益权功能与国家的给付义务——从基本权利分析框架的革新开始[J]. 中国法学, 2006(1): 225-251.
|
|
[9]
|
韩秀珍. 数字治理下行政协议信息公开机制优化路径——以PPP协议为例[J]. 科学决策, 2023(11): 222-235.
|
|
[10]
|
王春业, 王娟. 行政公益诉讼范围的“等外”解读[J]. 浙江学刊, 2019(6): 97-103.
|
|
[11]
|
王乐. 公私法融合视角下的PPP协议争议解决[J]. 北方法学, 2022, 16(1): 104-116.
|
|
[12]
|
肖华杰. PPP模式下政府监管的立法逻辑与规则构架[J]. 社会科学家, 2020(2): 118-123.
|
|
[13]
|
王春业. 论政府与社会资本合作(PPP)的行政法介入[J]. 社会科学战线, 2020(11): 211-220.
|
|
[14]
|
杨彬权. PPP模式下政府的角色定位——兼论担保行政法学模式的兴起[J]. 财经法学, 2021(1): 119-133.
|
|
[15]
|
刘海鸥, 贾韶琦. 政府和社会资本合作(PPP)立法的美国镜鉴与启示[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2020, 41(3): 155-160.
|
|
[16]
|
王春业. 论PPP领域预防性行政公益诉讼制度的构建[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020, 48(3): 118-126.
|
|
[17]
|
张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016: 688.
|
|
[18]
|
王春业. 独立行政公益诉讼法律规范体系之构建[J]. 中外法学, 2022, 34(1): 165-182.
|