档案行政处罚的裁量权实证研究

An Empirical Study on the Discretionary Power in Archival Administrative Penalties

摘要: 裁量权基准制度是规范档案行政处罚裁量权的重要手段。通过对现行档案行政处罚裁量权基准进行实证研究发现存在制定主体不明、技术构造不合理、制定程序不规范等问题。为进一步保障档案行政处罚裁量权在法治的轨道上运行，需要从明确基准制定主体、促进“情节细化”和“处罚格化”技术提升以完善基准内容、健全裁量基准制定与运行全流程的公开、检查、评估、清理程序三方面对其进行完善，以助力提高档案主管部门行政执法水平。

Abstract: The discretion benchmark system is an important means to regulate the discretion of archival administrative penalties. An empirical study on the current discretion benchmark for archival administrative penalties reveals problems such as unclear formulation of subjects, unreasonable technical structure, and non-standard formulation procedures. To further ensure that the discretion of archival administrative penalties operates within the track of the rule of law, it is necessary to improve it from three aspects: clarifying the subject of formulating the benchmark, promoting the technical upgrading of “circumstance refinement” and “penalty grading” to improve the content of the benchmark, and improving the open, inspection, evaluation, and cleaning procedures for the entire formulation and operation process of the discretion benchmark, so as to help improve the administrative law enforcement level of archival authorities.