平卧位直接前方入路微创半髋关节置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折的早期临床疗效
Early Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Hemiarthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach in the Supine Position for Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture
DOI: 10.12677/hjs.2026.151003, PDF,   
作者: 张 洋, 朱天信, 张文远, 朱恒杰:扬州洪泉医院骨科,江苏 扬州;黎品泉, 黎观保*:玉林市中西医结合骨科医院髋关节一科,广西 玉林
关键词: 直接前方入路微创外科半髋关节置换术老年患者股骨颈骨折Direct Anterior Approach Minimally Invasive Surgery Total Hip Arthroplasty Elderly Patients Femoral Neck Fracture
摘要: 目的:探讨直接前方入路(DAA)微创半髋关节置换术对老年股骨颈骨折患者的早期临床应用效果。方法:回顾性分析2024年9月至2025年6月收治的19例老年股骨颈骨折患者临床资料,均采用平卧位DAA微创半髋关节置换术治疗。其中女性12例、男性7例,年龄72~85岁。记录手术切口长度、手术时长、术中出血量等手术相关指标,随访观察患者首次下床负重时间、并发症发生情况,并采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)及髋关节Harris评分评估术后疼痛与功能恢复状况。结果:所有患者手术切口均为10 cm,手术耗时1.25~2.4 h,术中出血量100~200 ml;术后影像学检查显示假体位置及匹配度均良好,首次下床负重时间3~9 d,随访6~12个月。末次随访时,VAS评分0~2分,髋关节Harris评分78~96分,优良率达84.2% (16/19);仅出现1例下肢深静脉血栓、1例切口近端愈合不良,经对症处理后好转,未发生神经损伤、股骨穿孔、假体脱位等严重并发症。结论:平卧位DAA微创半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折,具有软组织损伤轻、术中出血少、并发症发生率低、术后恢复快等优势,可促进患者早期功能锻炼,是一种安全可靠的微创治疗方案。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the early clinical application effects of direct anterior approach (DAA) minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 19 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures admitted from September 2024 to June 2025, all of whom underwent supine DAA minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Among them, there were 12 female cases and 7 male cases, aged 72~85 years. Surgical-related indicators such as incision length, operative duration, and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. Follow-up observations included the first ambulation time and complication occurrence. Postoperative pain and functional recovery were assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and Harris hip score. Results: All patients had a 10cm surgical incision, with a duration of 1.25 to 2.4 hours and intraoperative blood loss ranging from 100 to 200 ml. Postoperative imaging revealed satisfactory prosthetic positioning and fit. The first ambulation with weight-bearing was achieved within 3 to 9 days, and follow-up lasted 6 to 12 months. At the final follow-up, the VAS score ranged from 0 to 2, and the Harris score for the hip joint ranged from 78 to 96, with an excellent or good rate of 84.2% (16/19). Only one case of deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremity and one case of poor wound healing proximal to the incision occurred, both of which improved after symptomatic treatment. No serious complications such as nerve injury, femoral perforation, or prosthesis dislocation occurred. Conclusion: The supine DAA minimally invasive hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients offers advantages such as minimal soft tissue damage, reduced intraoperative bleeding, low complication rate, and rapid postoperative recovery. It promotes early functional exercise and is a safe and reliable minimally invasive treatment option.
文章引用:张洋, 朱天信, 张文远, 朱恒杰, 黎品泉, 黎观保. 平卧位直接前方入路微创半髋关节置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折的早期临床疗效[J]. 外科, 2026, 15(1): 11-18. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjs.2026.151003

参考文献

[1] 高悠水. 2021年AAOS《老年髋部骨折的治疗: 基于循证的临床诊疗指南》解读[J]. 中国骨伤, 2023, 36(3): 279-283.
[2] 中华护理学会骨科护理专业委员会, 陈亚萍, 佟冰渡, 等. 老年髋部骨折综合管理与二次骨折预防的专家共识[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2020, 22(6): 461-469.
[3] 中华医学会骨科学分会创伤骨科学组, 中国医师协会骨科医师分会创伤专家工作委员会. 成人股骨颈骨折诊治指南[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2018, 20(11): 921-928.
[4] 赵海燕, 夏亚一, 康鹏德, 等. 直接前入路和后外侧入路全髋关节置换术早期功能康复的比较研究[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2017, 37(19): 1185-1192.
[5] Berend, K.R., Lombardi Jr., A.V., Seng, B.E. and Adams, J.B. (2009) Enhanced Early Outcomes with the Anterior Supine Intermuscular Approach in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume, 91, 107-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 裴福兴. 中国髋、膝关节置换的现状及展望[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2012, 1(1): 4-8.
[7] 黄公怡, 胡建华, 高新生. 老年人股骨颈骨折治疗原则与治疗方法的选择[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 1999, 18(6): 325-327.
[8] 中华医学会外科学分会, 中华医学会麻醉学分会. 加速康复外科中国专家共识暨路径管理指南(2018) [J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2018, 38(1): 8-13.
[9] 张先龙, 沈灏, 眭述平, 等. 双切口微创人工全髋关节置换术[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2005, 25(5): 268-270.
[10] 中国老年医学学会骨与关节分会创伤骨科学术工作委员会. 老年髋部骨折诊疗专家共识(2017) [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(11): 921-927.
[11] 李杰, 程治铭, 张瑗. 直接前方入路微创全髋关节置换术规范化方案[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2023, 32(9): 790-795.
[12] 沈军, 卫晓恩. 髋、膝关节置换术围手术期快速康复新理念[J]. 上海医药, 2017, 38(8): 7-9+16.
[13] 黄轩, 汪滋民, 徐卫东. 直接前方入路(DAA)行全髋置换围手术期并发症的分析和处理[C]//中华医学会. 中华医学会第十八届骨科学术会议暨第十一届COA国际学术大会论文集. 2016: 1-1.
[14] Jin, Z., Wang, L., Qin, J., Hu, H. and Wei, Q. (2023) Direct Anterior appro3ach versus Posterolateral Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Annals of Medicine, 55, 1378-1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 吴国锋, 孙晓亮, 周剑, 等. 全髋关节置换前方直接入路与后外侧入路术后早期疗效比较[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2016, 22(12): 1062-1064, 1068.
[16] 中华中医药学会骨伤科分会髋关节功能障碍诊疗指南制定工作组. 中医骨伤科临床诊疗指南·人工髋关节置换围手术期康复专家共识[J]. 康复学报, 2017, 27(4): 1-6.
[17] O’Connor, M.I. and Switzer, J.A. (2022) AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline Summary: Management of Hip Fractures in Older Adults. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 30, e1291-e1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Chung, Y.Y., Lee, S.M., Baek, S.N. and Park, T.G. (2022) Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Elderly with Femoral Neck Fractures: Comparison with Conventional Posterolateral Approach. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 14, 35-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]