基于影像组学预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后的临床研究进展
Advances in Clinical Research on Radiomics-Based Prediction of Prognosis in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.161253, PDF,   
作者: 李 泽, 李哲闻:山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)研究生部,山东 济南;刘广存*:山东第一医科大学第一附属医院神经外科,山东 济南
关键词: 影像组学动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后预测机器学习临床研究Radiomics Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Prognosis Prediction Machine Learning Clinical Research
摘要: 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)因其突发性和高致残率,成为神经科临床中的重大挑战,准确的预后评估对优化治疗方案和提高患者生活质量具有重要意义。近年来,影像组学作为一种结合高通量影像特征提取与先进机器学习算法的新兴技术,为aSAH的预后预测提供了新的视角和工具。当前研究主要集中于利用影像组学从CT、MRI等影像数据中提取多维度特征,并通过构建机器学习模型实现对患者预后风险的精准评估。然而,影像组学方法在aSAH领域仍面临特征稳定性、模型泛化能力及临床转化等多重挑战。本文系统综述了基于影像组学的特征提取技术、模型构建策略及其在临床应用中的研究进展,旨在促进该技术在aSAH预后预测中的规范化应用,推动个体化医疗的发展,为未来临床决策提供有力支持。
Abstract: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) poses a significant challenge in neurological clinical practice due to its sudden onset and high disability rate. Accurate prognosis assessment is critical for optimizing treatment strategies and improving patients’ quality of life. In recent years, radiomics, an emerging technology that combines high-throughput imaging feature extraction with advanced machine learning algorithms, has provided novel perspectives and tools for predicting aSAH prognosis. Current research primarily focuses on utilizing radiomics to extract multidimensional features from imaging data such as CT and MRI, and constructing machine learning models to achieve precise assessment of patients’ prognostic risks. However, radiomics approaches in the field of aSAH still face multiple challenges, including feature stability, model generalizability, and clinical translation. This article systematically reviews the feature extraction techniques, model construction strategies, and research progress in clinical applications of radiomics, aiming to promote the standardized use of this technology in aSAH prognosis prediction, advance the development of personalized medicine, and provide robust support for future clinical decision-making.
文章引用:李泽, 李哲闻, 刘广存. 基于影像组学预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后的临床研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(1): 2006-2013. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.161253

参考文献

[1] Lu, J., Wang, L., Li, R., Lin, F., Chen, Y., Yan, D., et al. (2023) Timing of Operation for Poor‐Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Relationship with Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Poor Prognosis. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 29, 1120-1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Ling, H., Tao, T., Li, W., Zhuang, Z., Ding, P., Na, S., et al. (2025) Predictors of Poor Functional Outcome after Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 251, Article ID: 108792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Yin, P., Wang, J., Zhang, C., Tang, Y., Hu, X., Shu, H., et al. (2025) Prediction of Functional Outcomes in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Using Pre-/Postoperative Noncontrast CT within 3 Days of Admission. NPJ Digital Medicine, 8, Article No. 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Huang, T., Li, W., Zhou, Y., Zhong, W. and Zhou, Z. (2024) Can the Radiomics Features of Intracranial Aneurysms Predict the Prognosis of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, Article ID: 1446784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Sato, A., Kitazawa, K., Nishikawa, A., Murata, T., Wada, N., Seguchi, T., et al. (2024) Proposed Imaging Assessment Score for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Correlated with Prognosis: Shinshu Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Score. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 119, 30-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Wu, X., Hu, X., Xia, Y. and Wang, B. (2025) The Serum Levels and Clinical Significance of Ferroptosis Markers in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Who Underwent Aneurysm Clipping Surgery. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 34, Article ID: 108440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Llull, L., Santana, D., Mosteiro, A., Pedrosa, L., Laredo, C., Zattera, L., et al. (2025) Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Predicts Poor Outcome in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Study. Stroke, 56, 2633-2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Chu, X., Hu, H., Godje, I.S.G., Zhu, L., Zhu, J., Feng, Y., et al. (2023) Elevated HMGB1 and sRAGE Levels in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 32, Article ID: 107061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Chen, L., Wang, X., Wang, S., Zhao, X., Yan, Y., Yuan, M., et al. (2025) Development of a Non-Contrast CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Early Prediction of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. BMC Medical Imaging, 25, Article No. 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Peng, F., Xia, J., Zhang, F., Lu, S., Wang, H., Li, J., et al. (2025) Intracranial Aneurysm Instability Prediction Model Based on 4D-Flow MRI and HR-MRI. Neurotherapeutics, 22, e00505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Sagues, E., Gudino, A., Dier, C., Shenoy, N., Ojeda, D., Wendt, L., et al. (2025) Predictive Models for Assessing the Risk of Brain Aneurysm Rupture. Journal of Neurosurgery, 143, 607-614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Jin, H., Chen, L., Zhu, T., Chu, G., Ma, L., Liang, G., et al. (2025) Predicting Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Risk and Intervention Outcomes Using Denoising-Enhanced CT Angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] An, X., He, J., Di, Y., Wang, M., Luo, B., Huang, Y., et al. (2022) Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Risk Estimation with Multidimensional Feature Fusion. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, Article ID: 813056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Urbanos, G., Castaño-León, A.M., Maldonado-Luna, M., Salvador, E., Ramos, A., Lechuga, C., et al. (2025) Comprehensive Predictive Modeling in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Integrating Radiomics and Clinical Variables. Neurosurgical Review, 48, Article No. 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Jiang, F., Ye, C., Yu, D., Chen, F., Xu, W., He, P., et al. (2025) Predicting Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Machine Learning Study. Frontiers in Neurology, 16, Article ID: 1659212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Zhou, Z., Dai, A., Yan, Y., Jin, Y., Zou, D., Xu, X., et al. (2023) Accurately Predicting the Risk of Unfavorable Outcomes after Endovascular Coil Therapy in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Interpretable Machine Learning Model. Neurological Sciences, 45, 679-691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Lin, T.C., Wang, K.J., Li, W.Z., Wu, G., Chen, F. and Huang, W. (2025) Interpretable Multimodal MRI Radiomics for Predicting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. BMC Medical Imaging, 25, Article No. 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Starke, S., Zwanenburg, A., Leger, K., Zöphel, K., Kotzerke, J., Krause, M., et al. (2023) Longitudinal and Multimodal Radiomics Models for Head and Neck Cancer Outcome Prediction. Cancers, 15, Article No. 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Akinci D’Antonoli, T., Cuocolo, R., Baessler, B. and Pinto dos Santos, D. (2023) Towards Reproducible Radiomics Research: Introduction of a Database for Radiomics Studies. European Radiology, 34, 436-443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Santinha, J., Pinto dos Santos, D., Laqua, F., Visser, J.J., Groot Lipman, K.B.W., Dietzel, M., et al. (2024) ESR Essentials: Radiomics—Practice Recommendations by the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics. European Radiology, 35, 1122-1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Abler, D., Schaer, R., Oreiller, V., Verma, H., Reichenbach, J., Aidonopoulos, O., et al. (2023) Quantimage V2: A Comprehensive and Integrated Physician-Centered Cloud Platform for Radiomics and Machine Learning Research. European Radiology Experimental, 7, Article No. 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Williams, T.L., Saadat, L.V., Gonen, M., Wei, A., Do, R.K.G. and Simpson, A.L. (2021) Radiomics in Surgical Oncology: Applications and Challenges. Computer Assisted Surgery, 26, 85-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Hatt, M., Lucia, F., Schick, U. and Visvikis, D. (2019) Multicentric Validation of Radiomics Findings: Challenges and Opportunities. EBioMedicine, 47, 20-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Dercle, L., McGale, J., Sun, S., Marabelle, A., Yeh, R., Deutsch, E., et al. (2022) Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges in Immunotherapy. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, 10, e005292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Linton-Reid, K., Chen, M., Martell, M.B., Posma, J.M. and Aboagye, E.O. (2026) Radiomics in Clinical Radiology: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions. Clinical Radiology, 92, Article ID: 107165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Verwey, J., Zwart, B., IJzerman, M., Visser, J.J. and Sülz, S. (2025) Factors Influencing AI Acceptance in Radiology: A Systematic Review across the Radiology Workflow. European Radiology. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Sperling, J., Welsh, W., Haseley, E., Quenstedt, S., Muhigaba, P.B., Brown, A., et al. (2024) Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models in Medical Decision-Making in Kidney Disease: Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on Trust and Appropriate Use. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 32, 51-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Cottin, A., Zulian, M., Pécuchet, N., Guilloux, A. and Katsahian, S. (2024) MS-CPFI: A Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Perturbation Feature Importance Algorithm for Interpreting Black-Box Multi-State Models. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 147, Article ID: 102741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Rajpoot, R., Gour, M., Jain, S. and Semwal, V.B. (2024) Integrated Ensemble CNN and Explainable AI for COVID-19 Diagnosis from CT Scan and X-Ray Images. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 24985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Choukali, M.A., Amirani, M.C., Valizadeh, M., Abbasi, A. and Komeili, M. (2024) Pseudo-Class Part Prototype Networks for Interpretable Breast Cancer Classification. Scientific Reports, 14, Article No. 10341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]