政策工具视角下发达国家技术出口管制政策研究——基于184份政策文本分析
A Study of Developed Countries’ Technology Export Control Policies from the Perspective of Policy Instruments—Based on the Analysis of 184 Policy Texts
摘要: 全球科技比较发达的国家都十分重视对技术的出口管制,通过对技术及其产品的出口管制,防止本国发达技术外流而丧失国际竞争优势。本文从政策工具的角度出发,选取发达国家发布的184篇相关政策文本,构建“政策工具–政策目标”二维分析框架,并利用Nvivo软件进行文本编码。结果表明:政策文本呈现效力位阶高、发布主体多元的特征;政策工具以权威型工具为主导,能力建设工具为辅助,系统性工具、劝告性工具和激励性工具为补充,同时工具内部结构失衡问题日益突出。政策目标围绕安全优先、发展从属的逻辑演进,且安全目标呈现泛化与强化趋势。本文进一步分析了政策工具选择背后的动因,最后从搭建政策跟踪与应对平台、强化核心技术的自主创新、优化产业与政策协同体系、推进多边合作与规则参与、平衡短期应急与长期发展等方面提出应对建议。
Abstract: Developed countries worldwide attach great importance to technology export control, preventing the outflow of advanced domestic technologies and the loss of international competitive advantages through the control of technology and its related products. This paper, from the perspective of policy instruments, selects 184 relevant policy texts published by developed countries, constructs a two-dimensional “policy instrument-policy objective” analytical framework, and uses NVivo software for text coding. The results show that the policy texts exhibit characteristics of high effectiveness and diverse issuing bodies; the policy instruments are dominated by authoritative instruments, supplemented by capacity-building instruments, and further complemented by systemic instruments, persuasive instruments, and incentive instruments. However, the internal structure of the instruments shows increasing imbalances. Policy objectives evolve around the logic of security priority and development subordination, with security objectives showing a trend of generalization and strengthening. This paper further analyzes the motivations behind the selection of policy instruments and finally proposes countermeasures from the aspects of building a policy tracking and response platform, strengthening independent innovation of core technologies, optimizing the industrial and policy coordination system, promoting multilateral cooperation and rule participation, and balancing short-term emergency response and long-term development.
文章引用:伍梓萌. 政策工具视角下发达国家技术出口管制政策研究——基于184份政策文本分析[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(1): 456-468. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.161049

参考文献

[1] 韩文艳, 房俊民. 科技安全背景下美欧出口管制政策机制的演变与启示[J]. 情报杂志, 2024, 43(5): 54-63+151.
[2] 韩召颖, 刘锦. 拜登政府对华高技术出口管制政策[J]. 国际展望, 2023, 15(6): 21-39+155-156.
[3] 贺德方, 李广建, 汤富强, 等. 国外技术出口管制演进分析与应对策略研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39(1): 79-94.
[4] 刘子奎. 冷战后美国出口管制政策的改革和调整[J]. 美国研究, 2008(2): 107-127+5-6.
[5] 秦渝斌. 大国竞争态势、社会联盟与美国对竞争者的出口管制政策[J]. 国际安全研究, 2025, 43(2): 65-90+166-167.
[6] 宋国友, 张纪腾. 战略竞争、出口管制与中美高技术产品贸易[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2023(3): 2-31+156.
[7] 张潇, 苏楠, 陈志, 等. 拜登政府对华技术出口管制态势解析及应对[J]. 情报杂志, 2023, 42(11): 48-53+60.
[8] 张潇, 苏楠, 陈志, 等. 拜登政府对华出口管制主题态势解析及应对策略[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2024(1): 168-177.
[9] 程慧, 邢政君. 中美博弈下美国对华出口管制的态势与走向[J]. 国际经济合作, 2025, 41(1): 23-32+91.
[10] 程慧, 刘立菲. 拜登政府对华出口管制政策分析与应对[J]. 国际贸易, 2022(8): 34-42.
[11] 王孝松, 刘元春. 出口管制与贸易逆差——以美国高新技术产品对华出口管制为例[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2017, 33(1): 91-104.
[12] Crosignani, M., Han, L., Macchiavelli, M., et al. (2026) Securing Technological Leadership? The Cost of Export Controls on Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 175, Article 104192.
[13] Crosignani, M., Han, L., Macchiavelli, M., et al. (2023) Geopolitical Risk and Decoupling: Evidence from US Export Controls.
https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/300475
[14] 首陈霄, 谈振林. 出口管制政策对企业投资的影响——来自美国实体清单政策的证据[J]. 财经论丛, 2024(4): 16-26.
[15] 赵健雅. 应对美国出口管制的企业竞争情报服务体系建设研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2024, 43(1): 70-76.
[16] 夏新月, 王延飞. 科技企业的出口管制应对分析方法研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(2): 31-37.
[17] 朱锋. “权力转移”理论: 霸权性现实主义? [J]. 国际政治研究, 2006(3): 24-42.
[18] 李巍, 李玙译. 解析美国对华为的“战争”——跨国供应链的政治经济学[J]. 当代亚太, 2021(1): 4-45+159.
[19] Mcdonnell, L.M. and Elmore, R.F. (1987) Getting the Job Done: Alternative Policy Instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 133-152.