电商交易背景下S银行信用卡APP智能客服满意度研究
A Study on Satisfaction of Intelligent Customer Service in S Bank’s Credit Card APP under the E-Commerce Transaction Context
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.14124697, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 周亦威*:上海理工大学管理学院,上海;上海理工大学智慧应急管理学院,上海;上海理工大学智慧城市交通研究院,上海;周 斌, 孙宇鸣:上海理工大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 平台触点电子服务质量智能客服总体满意度渠道忠诚意向Platform Touchpoints E-Service Quality Intelligent Customer Service Overall Satisfaction Channel Loyalty Intention
摘要: 近年来,电商交易与移动支付高频发生,信用卡线上结算后持续引发账单核对、分期办理、退款争议、风险拦截与跨境支持等交易后服务需求。信用卡APP内嵌智能客服凭借即时承接与自助闭环能力,成为连接电商交易事件与金融服务响应的关键平台触点,其服务体验直接影响用户对该渠道的忠诚意向。本文以S银行信用卡APP内嵌智能客服为研究对象,基于S-O-R逻辑与SERVPERF框架,构建电子服务质量、总体满意度与渠道忠诚意向(LOY)之间的作用机制模型,其中LOY由持续使用意向、推荐意愿与渠道优先选择意向三类行为意向表征。基于300份有效问卷数据,本文采用结构方程模型(SEM)与组态分析(fsQCA)进行检验。研究发现,在净效应层面,可靠性、响应性、保证性与移情性显著提升总体满意度,有形性影响不显著;总体满意度显著促进渠道忠诚意向,并发挥关键传导作用。在组态层面,高满意存在多条等效路径,核心组合主要集中于可靠性与响应性、可靠性与保证性,以及响应性与保证性的协同;低满意则主要表现为可靠性与响应性同时不足的缺口。结果表明,在电商交易后的线上服务情境中,准确可靠与响应效率是驱动智能客服满意度并形成渠道忠诚的基础条件。
Abstract: In recent years, e-commerce transactions and mobile payments have become increasingly frequent, and credit-card settlements completed online continue to trigger high-frequency post-transaction service needs, such as bill verification, installment processing, refund/dispute handling, risk interception, and cross-border support. Embedded AI customer service in credit-card mobile apps, with its real-time handling and self-service closure capability, has become a critical platform touchpoint linking e-commerce transaction events to financial service responses; the service experience at this touchpoint directly shapes users’ loyalty intention toward the channel. Focusing on the embedded AI customer service in S Bank’s credit-card app, this study develops a mechanism model relating e-service quality, overall satisfaction, and channel loyalty intention (LOY) based on the S-O-R logic and the SERVPERF framework. LOY is conceptualized as a behavioral intention manifested through continuance intention, recommendation intention, and channel preference (first-choice) intention. Using 300 valid questionnaires, the study conducts empirical tests via structural equation modeling (SEM) and configurational analysis (fsQCA). The net-effect results show that reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy significantly enhance overall satisfaction, while tangibles are not significant; overall satisfaction significantly promotes channel loyalty intention and plays a key transmitting role. At the configurational level, multiple equivalent paths lead to high satisfaction, with core combinations concentrated on the synergy between reliability and responsiveness, reliability and assurance, and responsiveness and assurance; low satisfaction is mainly characterized by concurrent deficiencies in reliability and responsiveness. Overall, in post-transaction online service contexts following e-commerce transactions, accuracy/reliability and response efficiency constitute the foundational conditions for improving AI customer service satisfaction and forming channel loyalty.
文章引用:周亦威, 周斌, 孙宇鸣. 电商交易背景下S银行信用卡APP智能客服满意度研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 6964-6979. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14124697

参考文献

[1] 国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2024年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL]. 2025-02-28.
https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202502/t20250228_1958817.html, 2025-12-10.
[2] 中国人民银行支付结算司. 2024年支付体系运行总体情况[EB/OL]. 2025-02-14.
https://www.pbc.gov.cn/zhifujiesuansi/128525/128545/128643/5589365/index.html, 2025-12-10.
[3] 央视网. 2024年消费者投诉举报呈现九大特点[EB/OL]. 2025-03-14.
https://news.cctv.com/2025/03/14/ARTI70fgdGrRhPt0VFeq7XJJ250314.shtml, 2025-12-10.
[4] 谢刚. 智能客服机器人在信用卡客服中心的应用价值[J]. 营销界, 2020(17): 87-88.
[5] 蒋有为, 颜晔, 张龙, 等. 智能客服在金融领域的应用研究——以嘉兴地区银行为例[J]. 黑龙江人力资源和社会保障, 2021(7): 134-137.
[6] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1988) SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12-40.
[7] Cronin, J.J. and Taylor, S.A. (1992) Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing, 56, 55-68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 吴薇, 向丹, 李阳. 电商情境下智能客服持续使用意愿影响研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2023, 37(3): 36-51.
[9] 赵艳. 电商平台自助结算服务质量对消费者忠诚度的影响——基于消费体验和心理距离的链式中介效应[J]. 商业经济研究, 2025(11): 65-68.
[10] Fang, J., Shao, Y. and Wen, C. (2016) Transactional Quality, Relational Quality, and Consumer e-Loyalty: Evidence from SEM and fsQCA. International Journal of Information Management, 36, 1205-1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Urueña, A. and Hidalgo, A. (2016) Successful Loyalty in E-Complaints: FsQCA and Structural Equation Modeling Analyses. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1384-1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Woodworth, R.S. (1929) Psychology. Revised Edition, Henry Holt and Company.
[13] Mehrabian, A. and Russell, J.A. (1974) An Approach to Environmental Psychology. The MIT Press.
[14] Donovan, R.J. and Rossiter, J.R. (1982) Store Atmosphere: An Environmental Psychology Approach. Journal of Retailing, 58, 34-57.
[15] Noor, N., Rao Hill, S. and Troshani, I. (2022) Developing a Service Quality Scale for Artificial Intelligence Service Agents. European Journal of Marketing, 56, 1301-1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Chen, Q., Gong, Y., Lu, Y. and Tang, J. (2022) Classifying and Measuring the Service Quality of AI Chatbot in Frontline Service. Journal of Business Research, 145, 552-568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Lee, Y., Kim, H. and Park, M. (2022) The Effects of Perceived Quality of Fashion Chatbot’s Product Recommendation Service on Perceived Usefulness, Trust and Consumer Response. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 46, 80-98.
[18] Janson, A. (2023) How to Leverage Anthropomorphism for Chatbot Service Interfaces: The Interplay of Communication Style and Personification. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, Article ID: 107954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Hsu, C. and Lin, J.C. (2023) Understanding the User Satisfaction and Loyalty of Customer Service Chatbots. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, Article ID: 103211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Fornell, C., Johnson, M.D., Anderson, E.W., Cha, J. and Bryant, B.E. (1996) The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings. Journal of Marketing, 60, 7-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Ashfaq, M., Yun, J., Yu, S. and Loureiro, S.M.C. (2020) I, Chatbot: Modeling the Determinants of Users’ Satisfaction and Continuance Intention of Ai-Powered Service Agents. Telematics and Informatics, 54, Article ID: 101473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994) Psychometric Theory. 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill.
[23] Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Ragin, C.C. (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Cangialosi, N. (2023) Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) in Organizational Psychology: Theoretical Overview, Research Guidelines, and a Step-by-Step Tutorial Using R Software. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 26, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P.C. and Aguilera, R.V. (2018) Studying Configurations with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Best Practices in Strategy and Organization Research. Strategic Organization, 16, 482-495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Fiss, P.C. (2011) Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393-420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model1. MIS Quarterly, 25, 351-370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2003) The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 9-30.
[31] Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. (1995) An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Weiner, B. (1985) An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef