稀缺感损耗自控力进而增加不道德行为:道德认同的调节模式探索
Scarcity Undermines Self-Control and Increases Unethical Behavior: Exploring the Moderating Pattern of Moral Identity
摘要: 本研究旨在探讨稀缺感对不道德行为的影响机制。基于自我损耗理论,研究提出了一个包含调节路径的中介模型,即稀缺感通过损耗个体的特质自控力,进而增加其不道德行为倾向,并检验道德认同在“稀缺感→自控力”路径中的潜在调节作用。通过一项涉及170名参与者的实验,采用写作任务启动稀缺感。结果显示:1) 稀缺感显著增加了不道德行为意向;2) 特质自控力在其中起部分中介作用;3) 探索性分析发现,稀缺感对自控力的损耗效应仅在高道德认同的个体中显著,而在低道德认同的个体中不显著,但该调节效应的整体交互作用未达到传统统计显著水平(p = 0.106)。研究结论认为,稀缺感对道德的影响是复杂的,本研究未能证实但提示了高道德认同个体在资源压力下的一种潜在脆弱性,这为未来研究指明了需进一步检验的方向。
Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the mechanism through which a sense of scarcity influences unethical behavior. Grounded in ego depletion theory, a moderated mediation model was proposed and tested, positing that scarcity increases unethical behavioral intention by depleting individuals’ trait self-control, with moral identity potentially moderating the “scarcity → self-control” path. An experiment was conducted with 170 participants, in which scarcity was primed via a writing task. The results showed that: 1) Scarcity significantly increased unethical behavioral intention; 2) Trait self-control played a partial mediating role in this relationship; 3) Exploratory analysis revealed that the depleting effect of scarcity on self-control was significant only among individuals with high moral identity, but not among those with low moral identity, although the overall interaction effect for this moderation did not reach conventional statistical significance (p = 0.106). The study concludes that the impact of scarcity on morality is complex. While the moderating role of moral identity was not confirmed, the findings suggest a potential vulnerability of high moral identifiers under resource pressure, thereby pointing to a specific direction for future research to verify.
文章引用:王思明 (2026). 稀缺感损耗自控力进而增加不道德行为:道德认同的调节模式探索. 心理学进展, 16(1), 366-375. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.161043

参考文献

[1] 陈冰, 赵玉芳(2017). 社会经济地位与大学生攻击行为: 控制感的中介作用. 心理技术与应用, 5(5), 265-273.[CrossRef
[2] 杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香(2023). 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响. 心理发展与教育, 39(3), 342-349.[CrossRef
[3] 雷亮, 王菁煜, 柳武妹(2020). 稀缺对个体心理和行为的影响: 基于一个更加整合视角下的阐释. 心理科学进展, 28(5), 833-843.
[4] 罗涛, 程李梅, 秦立霞, 肖水源(2021). 简式自我控制量表中文版的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 29(1), 83-86.[CrossRef
[5] 王兴超, 杨继平(2013). 道德推脱与大学生亲社会行为: 道德认同的调节效应. 心理科学, 36(4), 904-909.[CrossRef
[6] Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of Subjective and Objective Social Status with Psychological and Physiological Functioning: Preliminary Data in Healthy, White Women. Health Psychology, 19, 586-592.[CrossRef
[7] Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The Self-Importance of Moral Identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423-1440.[CrossRef
[8] Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2018). Ego Depletion: Is the Active Self a Limited Resource? In R. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-Regulation and Self-Control (pp. 16-44). Routledge.[CrossRef
[9] Børsting, C. K., Elbæk, C. T., Mitkidis, P., & Hochman, G. (2024). Resource Constraints Lead to Biased Attention but Decrease Unethical Behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 37, e2402.[CrossRef
[10] Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral Disengagement in Ethical Decision Making: A Study of Antecedents and Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 374-391.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Elbæk, C. T., Mitkidis, P., Aarøe, L., & Otterbring, T. (2023). Subjective Socioeconomic Status and Income Inequality Are Associated with Self-Reported Morality across 67 Countries. Nature Communications, 14, Article No. 5453.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Fehr, D., Fink, G., & Jack, B. K. (2022). Poor and Rational: Decision-Making under Scarcity. Journal of Political Economy, 130, 2862-2897.[CrossRef
[14] Gino, F., & Mogilner, C. (2014). Time, Money, and Morality. Psychological Science, 25, 414-421.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Goering, M., Espinoza, C. N., Mercier, A., Eason, E. K., Johnson, C. W., & Richter, C. G. (2024). Moral Identity in Relation to Emotional Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1346732.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Hamilton, R., Thompson, D., Bone, S., Chaplin, L. N., Griskevicius, V., Goldsmith, K. et al. (2019). The Effects of Scarcity on Consumer Decision Journeys. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47, 532-550.[CrossRef
[17] Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Publications.
[18] Lilleholt, L., Ścigała, K. A., & Zettler, I. (2023). Does Resource Scarcity Increase Self-Serving Dishonesty? Most People Wrongly Believe So. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152, 1887-1906.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty Impedes Cognitive Function. Science, 341, 976-980.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Rehren, P. (2024). The Effect of Cognitive Load, Ego Depletion, Induction and Time Restriction on Moral Judgments about Sacrificial Dilemmas: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1388966.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The Effects of Moral Judgment and Moral Identity on Moral Behavior: An Empirical Examination of the Moral Individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1610-1624.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Roux, C., Goldsmith, K., & Bonezzi, A. (2015). On the Psychology of Scarcity: When Reminders of Resource Scarcity Promote Selfish (and Generous) Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 615-631.[CrossRef
[23] Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). Some Consequences of Having Too Little. Science, 338, 682-685.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Shao, R., Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. (2008). Beyond Moral Reasoning: A Review of Moral Identity Research and Its Implications for Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 513-540.[CrossRef
[25] Sun, Y., Wang, X., Su, S., Chen, W., & Jiang, T. (2024). Low Self-Concept Clarity Induces Scarcity Perceptions: The Subsequent Effects on Prosocial Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High Self‐Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271-324.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Tangney, J. P., Boone, A. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2018). High Self-Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success. In R. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-Regulation and Self-Control (pp. 173-212). Routledge.[CrossRef
[28] Wang, Y., Wang, G., Chen, Q., & Li, L. (2017). Depletion, Moral Identity, and Unethical Behavior: Why People Behave Unethically after Self-Control Exertion. Consciousness and Cognition, 56, 188-198.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Yang, Y., Liu, L., Mou, K., Kong, S., & Wang, Y. (2023). Effect of Scarcity Experience on Unethical Behavior: The Mediating Role of Consideration of Future Consequences. Current Psychology, 42, 31495-31504.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Yu, L., Gao, J., Kong, Y., & Huang, L. (2024). Impact of Perceived Scarcity on Delay of Gratification: Meditation Effects of Self-Efficacy and Self-Control. Current Psychology, 43, 2899-2907.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Zhong, C., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing. Science, 313, 1451-1452.[CrossRef] [PubMed]