基于SaaS平台市场竞争情境下新兴厂商的策略选择研究
Research on the Strategic Choices for Emerging Vendors in the Competitive Context of the SaaS Platform Market
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.14124712, PDF,   
作者: 姚 成*:江苏科技大学经济管理学院,江苏 镇江;毕玉琢:中国船舶集团渤海造船有限公司船舶设计研究院数智制造研究所,辽宁 葫芦岛
关键词: SaaS平台竞争情境网络效应安全性风险平台引流SaaS Competitive Context Network Effects Security Risks Platform’s Traffic Diversion
摘要: 云计算技术的SaaS模式重构了传统软件产业的价值链体系,在引发商业模式创新的同时,也带来了其开放性主导下的竞争失衡与共享性主导下的安全风险双重挑战。针对平台既有厂商的先发优势锁定与云服务安全的负外部性问题,本研究通过构建动态Stackelberg博弈模型,结合数值仿真方法,揭示了新兴SaaS厂商在平台市场竞争下的最优运营策略。研究发现:1) 当已有SaaS厂商的网络效应小于一定阈值时,新兴SaaS厂商后续应用服务需求量将不再受其影响。2) SaaS平台的引流效应越强,新兴SaaS厂商所制定应用服务的价格就会越高,但并不会因其导致客户的购买量减少,反而需求上升使得最终收益增加。此外,SaaS平台引流效应较小时,新兴SaaS厂商的收益会随着引流投入的增加而减少,反之,其收益会随着引流投入呈“U”型变化。3) 新兴SaaS厂商采取软件安全提升策略时,可通过涨价策略来平衡因提升软件安全性而产生的成本损失。然而,随着软件安全性的提升,其收益并非持续增长,而是呈现出“U”型态势。本研究为新兴SaaS厂商突破平台市场竞争壁垒、完善双边市场定价机制具有重要的决策参考价值。
Abstract: The SaaS model of cloud computing technology has reconfigured the value chain system of the traditional software industry. While driving business model innovation, it also presents dual challenges: competition imbalances under the influence of its openness and security risks dominated by its shared nature. To address the first-mover advantage lock-in by incumbent platform vendors and the negative externalities of cloud service security, this paper constructs a dynamic Stackelberg game model combined with numerical simulation to reveal the optimal operational strategies for emerging SaaS vendors in platform market competition. The findings indicate: 1) When the network effect of existing SaaS vendors falls below a certain threshold, the subsequent application service demand of emerging SaaS vendors will no longer be affected by it. 2) The stronger the traffic diversion effect of the SaaS platform, the higher the price set by emerging SaaS vendors for their application services. However, this does not lead to a reduction in customer purchases; instead, rising demand ultimately increases revenue. Furthermore, when the platform’s traffic diversion effect is weak, the revenue of emerging SaaS vendors decreases with increased diversion investment. Conversely, when the effect is strong, revenue follows a “U-shaped” pattern in response to diversion investment. 3) When emerging SaaS vendors adopt software security enhancement strategies, they can offset the cost losses incurred by improving security through price increases. However, as software security improves, revenue does not increase continuously but rather exhibits a “U-shaped” trend. This study provides significant decision-making references for emerging SaaS vendors to break through platform market competition barriers and refine the pricing mechanism in two-sided markets.
文章引用:姚成, 毕玉琢. 基于SaaS平台市场竞争情境下新兴厂商的策略选择研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(12): 7122-7130. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.14124712

参考文献

[1] 王节祥, 衡予婧, 胡乾韬, 等. 数字平台与集群企业价值共创的演进机制[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(11): 274-288.
[2] 王海平, 林军, 冉伦. 竞争环境下SaaS提供商的定价策略选择及其社会福利分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 89-96.
[3] 解学梅, 韩宇航, 俞磊. 如何跨越平台创新鸿沟: 平台生态系统超模块创新体系的价值创造机制研究[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(7): 175-204.
[4] 焦豪, 张睿, 杨季枫. 数字经济情境下企业战略选择与数字平台生态系统构建——基于共演视角的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(12): 201-229.
[5] Lamothe, M., Guéhéneuc, Y. and Shang, W. (2021) A Systematic Review of API Evolution Literature. ACM Computing Surveys, 54, 1-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Sun, J., Xu, D. and Karanasios, S. (2023) How Parts Connect to Whole in Building Digital Generativity in Digital Platform Ecosystems. European Conference on Information Systems, 12, 1351-1364.
[7] 马鸿佳, 王春蕾, 李卅立, 等. 数据驱动如何提升数字平台生态系统竞争优势?——基于数据网络效应视角[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(12): 170-185.
[8] 李雪灵, 樊镁汐, 龙玉洁, 等. 工业互联网平台与“双重身份”用户企业价值共创的协同演化机理研究[J]. 管理世界, 2025, 41(6): 158-181.
[9] Kang, M., Templeton, G. and Um, S. (2023) Vulnerability Diffusions in Software Product Networks. Journal of Operations Management, 69, 1342-1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 叶新兰, 官振中, 任建标. 消费者失望厌恶下的软件厂商SaaS渠道引入策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2025, 34(1): 13-26.
[11] 陈睿哲. 中国SAAS市场发展问题探析[J]. 科学决策, 2023, 2(1): 149-160.
[12] Li, S., Cheng, H.K. and Jin, Y. (2018) Optimal Distribution Strategy for Enterprise Software: Retail, Saas, or Dual Channel? Production and Operations Management, 27, 1928-1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 张志远, 叶涛锋. 考虑不同计费方式的SaaS服务供应商定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 214-223.
[14] Zhang, Z. (2020) Competitive Pricing Strategies for Software and Saas Products. Information & Management, 57, Article ID: 103367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Zhang, Z., Nan, G. and Tan, Y. (2020) Cloud Services vs. On-Premises Software: Competition under Security Risk and Product Customization. Information Systems Research, 31, 848-864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Bender, B., Thim, C. and Linke, F. (2021) Platform Coring in the Browser Domain—An Exploratory Study. In: Bender, B., Thim, C. and Linke, F., EDS., Platform Coring on Digital Software Platforms, Springer, 119-148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Thomas, L.D.W. and Tee, R. (2021) Generativity: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24, 255-278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 应瑛, 董珊, 魏江, 等. 工业互联网平台赋能参与者数字创新的机制研究——基于再生性架构设计视角[J]. 管理世界, 2025, 41(6): 179-198.
[19] 赵艺璇, 成琼文. 生态系统视角下企业如何实现“数实”资源融合? [J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(4): 261-272.
[20] 唐国锋, 李丹, 艾兴政. 服务成本信息不完全下的SaaS云外包合约研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(4): 160-169.
[21] 解学梅, 王宏伟, 余生辉. 上下同欲者胜: 开放式创新生态网络结构对价值共创影响机理[J]. 管理科学学报, 2024, 27(3): 133-158.