恶意网络爬虫行为的刑法规制研究
Criminal Law Regulation of Malicious Web Crawling
摘要: 网络爬虫作为互联网行业广泛应用的技术,极大地便利了人们信息收集和检索,同时也成为了违法犯罪的便捷工具。对具有主观恶意的网络爬虫行为进行有效的刑法规制迫在眉睫。基于我国司法实践中对网络爬虫行为入罪标准不一、罪名适用模糊的现状,应从构成要件入手,从形式和实质两方面界定恶意网络爬虫的入罪标准。形式上应限定爬取行为的非开放性及侵入手段的非授权性,实质界定的标准应是爬取行为的法益侵害性。在明确入罪标准后将恶意网络爬虫行为予以类型化定性分析,从而实现更加罪名适用的精准性和特定法益保护的有效性。
Abstract: As a widely used technology in the internet industry, web crawlers have greatly facilitated people's information collection and retrieval, while also becoming a convenient tool for illegal and criminal activities. It is imperative to effectively regulate web crawling behavior with subjective malice through criminal law. Based on the current situation in China’s judicial practice—where the standards for criminalizing web crawling behavior are inconsistent and the application of charges remains ambiguous—it is necessary to start from the constituent elements and define the criteria for criminalizing malicious web crawling from both formal and substantive aspects. Formally, the scope should be limited to the non-open nature of the crawling behavior and the unauthorized nature of intrusion means; substantively, the criterion should be the infringement of legal interests caused by the crawling behavior. After clarifying the criteria for criminalization, a typological qualitative analysis of malicious web crawling behavior should be conducted, so as to achieve more precise application of charges and enhance the effectiveness of protecting specific legal interests.
文章引用:石郑晓. 恶意网络爬虫行为的刑法规制研究[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(1): 199-207. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.121026

参考文献

[1] 张莉. 数据治理与数据安全[M]. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2019.
[2] 王立梅, 郭旨龙. 网络法学研究[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2022.
[3] Kerr, O.S. (2003) Cybercrime’s Scope: Interpreting Access and Authorization in Computer Misuse Statutes. NYU Law Review, 78, 1596-1668.
[4] Zamora, A. (2019) Making Room for Big Data: Web Scraping and an Affirmative Right to Access Publicly Available Information Online. The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law, 12, 203.
[5] 刘宪权. 元宇宙空间中数据的分类分级与刑法保护[J]. 比较法研究, 2023(4): 51-64.
[6] 苏青. 网络爬虫的演变及其合法性限定[J]. 比较法研究, 2021(3): 89-104.
[7] 劳东燕. 个人数据的刑法保护模式[J]. 比较法研究, 2020(5): 35-50.
[8] 张勇. 数据安全法益的参照系与刑法保护模式[J]. 河南社会科学, 2021, 29(5): 42-52.
[9] 杨志琼. 数据时代网络爬虫的刑法规制[J]. 比较法研究, 2020(4): 185-200.
[10] 张明楷. 新刑法与法益侵害说[J]. 法学研究, 2000(1): 19-32.
[11] 王昭武. 法秩序统一性视野下违法判断的相对性[J]. 中外法学, 2015, 27(1): 170-197.
[12] 吴冬兴. 论法秩序统一性原则的司法应用逻辑[J]. 法学, 2022(7): 23-39.
[13] 周光权. “刑民交叉”案件的判断逻辑[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2020(3): 3-20.
[14] 陈家林. 法益理论的问题与出路[J]. 法学, 2019(11): 3-17.
[15] 田宏杰. 刑法法益: 现代刑法的正当根基和规制边界[J]. 法商研究, 2020, 37(6): 75-88.