混频模型下经济政策不确定性与股市波动研究
Study on Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Market Volatility under the Mixed-Frequency Model
摘要: 实证研究表明,经济政策不确定性(EPU)对股市波动具有重要影响,而股指收益率分布存在显著的时变高阶矩特征。传统的波动率模型难以有效捕捉这些特征,往往导致对股市波动的低估或高估。为此,本文以沪深300指数和中国经济政策不确定性指数(CEPU)为研究对象,基于Gram-Charlier展开式(GCE)构建包含时变高阶矩的GARCH-MIDAS-SK模型,并引入CEPU指数,构建了GARCH-MIDAS-SK-CEPU模型,旨在分析经济政策不确定性对中国股市波动的影响。实证结果表明,股指收益率分布呈现出明显的时变高阶矩特征,CEPU对股市波动率具有显著的正向作用。引入CEPU指数和时变高阶矩特征能够提升模型的预测性能。此外,DM检验结果显示,本文构建的模型在股市波动率预测中优于传统基准模型,为股市波动率预测提供了更有效的工具。
Abstract: Empirical research shows that economic policy uncertainty (EPU) has a significant impact on stock market volatility, while stock return distributions exhibit significant time-varying higher moment characteristics. Traditional volatility models often fail to effectively capture these features, leading to underestimation or overestimation of stock market volatility. To address this issue, this paper uses the CSI 300 Index and the Chinese Economic Policy Uncertainty Index (CEPU) as research objects, and constructs a GARCH-MIDAS-SK model incorporating time-varying higher moments based on the Gram-Charlier expansion (GCE). Furthermore, the CEPU index is introduced to construct a GARCH-MIDAS-SK-CEPU model, aiming to analyze the impact of economic policy uncertainty on stock market volatility in China. The empirical results show that stock return distributions significantly exhibit time-varying higher moment characteristics, and CEPU has a significant positive effect on stock market volatility. Incorporating the CEPU index and time-varying higher moments improves the model’s predictive performance. Moreover, the DM test results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms traditional benchmark models in stock market volatility prediction, providing a more effective tool for stock market volatility forecasting.
文章引用:张亚雯, 魏正元, 张怡丹, 陈奕然. 混频模型下经济政策不确定性与股市波动研究[J]. 统计学与应用, 2026, 15(1): 283-292. https://doi.org/10.12677/sa.2026.151026

参考文献

[1] 关筱谨, 张骏, 刘彦迪. 媒体关注度、投资者情绪与股票市场波动[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(24): 143-148.
[2] 廖文欣, 徐晓光. 经济不确定性对股票市场长期波动的非对称效应[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2024(11): 89-102.
[3] Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 王朋吾. 基于非对称GARCH类模型的中国股价波动研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(22): 152-155.
[5] Celestin, M., Vasuki, M., Kumar, A.D., et al. (2025) Applications of GARCH Models for Volatility Forecasting in High-Frequency Trading Environments. Zenodo, 10, 12-21.
[6] Engle, R.F., Ghysels, E. and Sohn, B. (2013) Stock Market Volatility and Macroeconomic Fundamentals. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 776-797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Yu, X. and Huang, Y. (2021) The Impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Stock Volatility: Evidence from GARCH-MIDAS Approach. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 570, Article ID: 125794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Wang, N., Yin, J. and Li, Y. (2024) Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Market Volatility in China: Evidence from SV-MIDAS-T Model. International Review of Financial Analysis, 92, Article ID: 103090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Iseringhausen, M. (2020) The Time-Varying Asymmetry of Exchange Rate Returns: A Stochastic Volatility—Stochastic Skewness Model. Journal of Empirical Finance, 58, 275-292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 柯睿, 郝斌, 谭常春. 金融时变高阶矩建模及其风险测度研究: 基于收益率分解的方法[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2024, 43(1): 177-190.
[11] Narayan, P.K. and Liu, R. (2018) A New GARCH Model with Higher Moments for Stock Return Predictability. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 56, 93-103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Baker, S.R., Bloom, N. and Davis, S.J. (2016) Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 1593-1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Diebold, F.X. and Mariano, R.S. (2002) Comparing Predictive Accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20, 134-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef