生成式人工智能生成内容的侵权风险与规制路径
Infringement Risks and Regulatory Paths of Content Generated by Generative Artificial Intelligence
摘要: 当今生成式人工智能的发展迅速,其生成内容的质量受到了广泛的关注,该技术的飞速发展与法律的滞后性相矛盾,因此生成内容的侵权风险难以适用传统的法律体系加以规制,给治理带来了困境。为厘清生成式人工智能生成内容侵权风险的规制路径,本文以动态体系论为基础,聚焦生成内容的侵权风险问题,结合目前存在的治理困境展开分析。研究发现需构建能动分工的分层治理机制,同时明确生成内容著作权的归属标准,并且需要完善生成侵权内容的过错归责原则。为生成内容的侵权风险规制路径提供具体参考,也为生成式人工智能的后续研究拓展了动态治理的研究方向。
Abstract: Nowadays, generative artificial intelligence is developing rapidly, and the quality of the content it generates has attracted widespread attention. The rapid advancement of this technology conflicts with the inherent lag of legal systems. Consequently, the infringement risks associated with generative content cannot be effectively regulated by traditional legal frameworks, creating predicaments for governance. To clarify the regulatory approaches to the infringement risks of generative AI content, this paper, based on the theory of dynamic systems, focuses on the issue of infringement risks of generative content and conducts an analysis in combination with the current governance dilemmas. The study finds that it is necessary to establish a hierarchical governance mechanism featuring active division of labor, clarify the ownership criteria for the copyright of generative content, and improve the fault liability principle for the creation of infringing content. This research provides specific references for the regulatory paths of generative content infringement risks, and also expands the research direction of dynamic governance for subsequent studies on generative artificial intelligence.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十五个五年规划的建议[J]. 前进, 2025(11): 9-27.
|
|
[2]
|
全国网络安全标准化技术委员会(SAC/TC260). GB/T45654-2025网络安全技术生成式人工智能服务安全基本要求[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2025.
|
|
[3]
|
丁国峰, 寿晓明. 经营者滥用人工智能生成合成信息不正当竞争的技术治理路径[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2025(5): 47-67.
|
|
[4]
|
林雨佳. 生成式人工智能对信息治理的挑战与应对[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 46(2): 104-115.
|
|
[5]
|
姚志伟, 李卓霖. 生成式人工智能内容风险的法律规制[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 43(5): 147-160.
|
|
[6]
|
刘杰勇. 论人工智能生成内容的著作权保护——基于比较法的视角[J]. 比较法研究, 2024(4): 176-193.
|
|
[7]
|
张凌寒, 于琳. 生成式人工智能价值链上的侵权责任划分[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2025(5): 72-83.
|
|
[8]
|
邓宏光, 王雪璠. 生成式人工智能虚假信息治理的风险与应对[J]. 理论月刊, 2024(9): 115-129.
|
|
[9]
|
Elgammal, A., Liu, B.C., Elhoseiny, M. and Mazzone, M. (2017) Can: Creative Adversarial Networks, Generating “Art” by Learning about Styles and Deviating from Style Norms. arXiv:1 706.07068.
|
|
[10]
|
位涛涛. 生成式人工智能训练数据的侵权风险与规制路径[J]. 青海民族大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 51(4): 179-189.
|
|
[11]
|
王利明. 生成式人工智能侵权的归责原则与过错认定[J]. 中国法律评论, 2025(4): 15-30.
|
|
[12]
|
黄尹旭. 《人工智能生成合成内容标识办法》的规范功能与法律适用[J]. 法律适用, 2025(9): 136-147.
|
|
[13]
|
杨瑞琦. 人工智能生成物可版权性的法律因应: 适格难点、版权获得与公共对策[J/OL]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版): 1-10. 2025-12-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[14]
|
张华韬. 动态体系论下生成式人工智能侵权的归责与构成[J]. 法学杂志, 2025, 46(6): 82-101.
|
|
[15]
|
Helberger, N. and Diakopoulos, N. (2023) ChatGPT and the AI Act. Internet Policy Review, 12, 1-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|