“新医科”背景下课程思政与AI赋能的双螺旋教学模式构建研究
Constructing a Double-Helix Teaching Model Integrating Curriculum Ideology and Politics with AI Empowerment under the Background of “New Medicine”
DOI: 10.12677/ve.2026.152068, PDF,   
作者: 刘 娟:中国人民解放军空军军医大学基础医学院,陕西 西安;金 超, 阴继凯:中国人民解放军空军军医大学第二附属医院普通外科,陕西 西安;陈慧芸, 逯笛言:中国人民解放军空军军医大学第二附属医院外科学教研室,陕西 西安
关键词: 新医科课程思政人工智能医学教育New Medicine Curriculum Ideological and Political Education Artificial Intelligence Medical Education
摘要: 在“健康中国”战略与“新医科”建设背景下,对医学教育质量提出了更高要求,教育过程融合“价值塑造、知识传授、能力培养与创新引领”四个维度。当前医学教育存在课程思政元素碎片化、AI应用浅表化的突出问题,导致人才培养出现人文素养与技术能力割裂的“断腿”现象。为此,本研究基于建构主义理论、TPACK框架与形成性评价理念,创新性提出“思政–技术”双螺旋教学模型。该模型以医学专业知识为骨架,“思政链”与“技术链”为双螺旋,通过具体教学环节紧密连接,形成闭环培养机制。“思政链”采用“四级挖掘法”系统提取思政元素,借助AI实现精准匹配与场景模拟;“技术链”通过个性化知识管理、核心技能模拟训练、高阶思维决策支持三层级赋能,并融入思政浸润。该模型突破传统教育割裂困境,为医学教育改革提供可操作路径,助力培养德才兼备的新时代医学人才。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the “Healthy China” strategy and the “New Medicine” construction, higher requirements are placed on the quality of medical education, which necessitates the integration of “value shaping, knowledge imparting, capability cultivation, and innovation leadership” into the educational process. Currently, medical education faces prominent issues such as the fragmentation of ideological and political elements in the curriculum and the superficial application of artificial intelligence (AI), leading to a disconnection between the cultivation of humanistic literacy and technical skills among students, manifesting as an “unbalanced development” phenomenon. To address these challenges, this study, based on constructivist theory, the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, and formative assessment concepts, innovatively proposes a “Ideology-Technology” double-helix teaching model. This model uses professional medical knowledge as its backbone, with the “Ideology Chain” and the “Technology Chain” forming the double helix, closely interconnected through specific teaching links to establish a closed-loop training mechanism. The “Ideology Chain” adopts a “Four-Level Mining Method” to systematically extract ideological and political elements, leveraging AI for precise matching and scenario simulation. The “Technology Chain” empowers education through three tiers: personalized knowledge management, simulation training of core skills, and support for higher-order thinking decision-making, all while integrating ideological and political infiltration. This model breaks through the dilemma of disconnection in traditional education, provides an operable path for the reform of medical education, and contributes to cultivating medical talents with both professional competence and moral integrity for the new era.
文章引用:刘娟, 金超, 陈慧芸, 逯笛言, 阴继凯. “新医科”背景下课程思政与AI赋能的双螺旋教学模式构建研究[J]. 职业教育发展, 2026, 15(2): 68-74. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2026.152068

参考文献

[1] 杨鹤. 关于促进和规范“人工智能+医疗卫生”应用发展的实施意见[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202511/content_7047018.htm, 2025-10-20.
[2] 龚言红, 梁渊, 卢祖洵, 殷晓旭. 健康中国战略背景下医学院校健康教育学课程教学改革实践研究[J]. 中国社会医学杂志, 2025, 42(3): 301-304.
[3] 张晖, 刘继海. 人工智能在医学教育中的应用发展及思考[J]. 今日科苑, 2025(3): 15-22.
[4] 张峰源, 牛启超, 刘艳华, 周明珠, 宋安琪, 姜泓伯, 张玉环. “新医科”背景下医学专业本科生人文素养培育路径探析[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2025, 43(14): 41-44.
[5] 汪恒, 王妍, 沈宁, 韩江莉. 人工智能教学病例库在住院医师临床思维培训中的应用[J]. 医院管理论坛, 2024, 41(1): 60-63.
[6] 殷悦, 宋汉君, 史文哲, 孟庆媛, 卞德强, 张雪. 以螺旋进阶模式重构医学人文衔接路径[J]. 医学与哲学, 2025, 46(13): 62-67.
[7] Zeng, J., Shi, L., Liu, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, L., Song, H., et al. (2025) Enhancing Neuroanatomy Teaching with DSI Studio’s Fiber Reconstruction Technology. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 16, 875-889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Chun, S.Y.Q., Salim, N.D., Jarrell, L.Y., Yuan, J.K.Z., Ang, E. and Lomanto, D. (2025) How to Teach the Anatomy of the Inguinal Canal? A Multimodal Approach. Heliyon, 11, e42434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Lan, G., Feng, X., Du, S., Song, F. and Xiao, Q. (2025) Integrating Ethical Knowledge in Generative AI Education: Constructing the GenAI-TPACK Framework for University Teachers’ Professional Development. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 15621-15644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Krumsvik, R.J. (2025) GPT-4’s Capabilities for Formative and Summative Assessments in Norwegian Medicine Exams—An Intrinsic Case Study in the Early Phase of Intervention. Frontiers in Medicine, 12, Article 1441747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 朱建芳, 邹光华, 宋富美, 李楠. 高校专业课程挖掘思政元素方法探讨[J]. 华北科技学院学报, 2023, 20(3): 113-118.
[12] Ouyang, Y., Gao, W., Wang, H., Chen, L., Wang, J. and Zeng, Y. (2025) MEDSQ: Towards Personalized Medical Education via Multi-Form Interaction Guidance. Expert Systems with Applications, 267, Article 126138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 王允, 何晓红, 梁亦龙, 谢永芳, 曾垂省, 武巍峰. 基于生物医学知识图谱的课程思政智能融合体系构建[J]. 教育进展, 2025, 15(5): 1533-1539.
[14] Janumpally, R., Nanua, S., Ngo, A. and Youens, K. (2025) Generative Artificial Intelligence in Graduate Medical Education. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, Article 1525064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Qiu, P., Wu, C., Liu, S., Fan, Y., Zhao, W., Chen, Z., et al. (2025) Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Clinical Cases. Nature Communications, 16, Article No. 9799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Bottrighi, A., Grosso, F., Ghiglione, M., Maconi, A., Nera, S., Piovesan, L., et al. (2025) A Symbolic AI Approach to Medical Training. Journal of Medical Systems, 49, Article No. 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Szydlak, R., Kiyak, Y.S., Hege, I., Górski, S., Linglart, L., Shchudrova, T., et al. (2025) ChatGPT versus Human Authors: A Comparative Study of Concept Maps for Clinical Reasoning Training with Virtual Patients. Medical Teacher, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef