比较法视野下中国涉外商事调解制度的构建与完善
The Construction and Improvement of China’s Foreign-Related Commercial Mediation System from the Perspective of Comparative Law
摘要: 在全球经济一体化与“一带一路”倡议深入推进的背景下,中国涉外商事活动日益频繁,纠纷解决需求激增。商事调解作为一种高效灵活的替代性纠纷解决机制,其重要性日益凸显。然而,中国现行涉外商事调解制度存在立法体系碎片化、调解协议执行力不足、机构监管与调解员资质混乱等困境。本文通过比较法视角,考察欧盟、美国及新加坡等法域的成熟经验,提出中国应构建以统一立法为基础、以高效执行为保障、以主体规范为核心、以程序协同为纽带、以本土创新为特色的涉外商事调解制度,以提升中国在国际商事纠纷解决市场中的竞争力。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the deepening of economic globalization and the “Belt and Road Initiative”, China’s foreign commercial activities have become increasingly frequent, and the demand for dispute resolution has soared. As an efficient and flexible alternative dispute resolution mechanism, commercial mediation has become increasingly important. However, China’s current foreign commercial mediation system is beset by fragmented legislation, insufficient enforceability of mediation agreements, and chaotic regulation of institutions and mediators’ qualifications. Through a comparative law perspective, this paper examines the mature experiences of the European Union, the United States, and Singapore, and proposes that China should establish a foreign commercial mediation system based on unified legislation, guaranteed by efficient enforcement, centered on subject norms, linked by procedural coordination, and characterized by local innovation, in order to enhance China’s competitiveness in the international commercial dispute resolution market.
文章引用:魏家益. 比较法视野下中国涉外商事调解制度的构建与完善[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(1): 208-218. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.121027

参考文献

[1] 段琳. 我国多元化商事调解组织的功能特征[J]. 中国外资, 2025(17): 106-109.
[2] 张华东. 促进新时代中国商事调解发展的思考与建议[J]. 中国法治, 2025(6): 93-97.
[3] 张雅琳. 商事调解制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2025.
[4] 林福辰. 中国商事调解协议执行机制与《新加坡调解公约》: 功能承载差异及渐进并轨发展[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2025, 36(1): 103-112.
[5] 张晓凤, 韩露. 《新加坡调解公约》下我国商事调解制度的因应[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报, 2025, 16(2): 59-63.
[6] 张晓玉. 论中国国际商事调解制度的建构与完善[C]//《法学前沿》集刊2024年第2卷——航运法治保障研究文集. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2024: 267-275.
[7] Lin, M. (2024) A Future Uniform Regime of International Commercial Mediator Immunity: Limited, Party-Agreed and Statute-Required. Chinese Journal of Transnational Law, 1, 176-197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Zhao, X.C. (2024) Study on the Improvement of China’s Commercial Mediation System in the Context of the Singapore Convention on Mediation. International Journal of Asian Social Science Research, 1, 36-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 张城玉. 我国商事调解协议执行机制的完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 蚌埠: 安徽财经大学, 2024.
[10] 黄馨瑶. 商事调解制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2024.
[11] Lin, J.Q. (2023) Construction of the International Commercial Mediation Mechanism under BRI. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 6, 78-83.
[12] 日本商事调解制度概览[J]. 人民调解, 2023(11): 56-59.
[13] 赵毅宇. 中国商事调解立法理由的体系化展开[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2023, 34(2): 49-59.
[14] 张新圆. 我国国际商事调解制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林财经大学, 2023.
[15] 赵毅宇. 中国商事调解立法模式选择及其展开[J]. 法学杂志, 2023, 44(3): 157-172.
[16] 中国社会科学院国际法研究所“中国商事调解立法”研究课题组, 刘敬东. 论我国商事调解立法的必要性、立法路径及立法框架[J]. 人民调解, 2023(1): 31-35.
[17] Malacka, M. (2022) The Singapore Mediation Convention and International Business Mediation. International and Comparative Law Review, 22, 179-196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 王芳. 中国商事调解这十年: 紧跟时代砥砺奋进探索创新谱写华章[J]. 中国对外贸易, 2022(10): 26-29.
[19] 文金羚. 《新加坡调解公约》下我国商事调解协议执行机制研究[J]. 商事仲裁与调解, 2022(5): 122-137.
[20] 王纪力. 我国商事调解制度与《新加坡公约》衔接问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东财经大学, 2022.
[21] Yin, Y.T. (2021) Singapore Convention on Mediation and Its Ratification in China. Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies, 4, 55-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 赵盼. 论我国商事调解员中立性制度的完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 外交学院, 2021.
[23] 张艳, 房昕. 《新加坡调解公约》下我国商事调解协议的执行力问题研究[J]. 法律适用, 2021(5): 38-45.
[24] 张丽英. 《新加坡调解公约》的解读及中国商事调解制度的衔接[J]. 商事仲裁与调解, 2020(2): 3-17.