数字经济背景下的ESG表现与企业绿色技术创新
ESG Performance and Corporate Green Technology Innovation in the Context of Digital Economy
摘要: 本文立足于数字经济深度发展的宏观背景,探讨ESG表现对企业绿色技术创新的影响。实现“双碳”目标要求企业从根本上转变发展模式,ESG为企业践行可持续发展提供了综合的管理框架,而绿色技术创新则是实现环境效益与长期竞争力突破的关键路径。在数字化转型不断深化的情境下,二者结合研究对于理解企业如何通过具体行动响应战略转型具有核心意义。本文以2009~2023年中国A股上市公司为样本,实证检验ESG表现对企业绿色技术创新的影响,并重点探究企业声誉和研发投入在其中的作用机制。研究发现:(1) 良好的ESG表现能够显著促进企业绿色技术创新;(2) 企业声誉与研发投入在二者间均发挥显著的部分中介作用,揭示了“外部资源获取”与“内部资源转化”的关键传导路径;(3) 数字化转型可强化二者关系且该效应在非国有企业中更为显著。本文结论为理解数字经济时代ESG表现的经济后果提供了机制性依据,并对引导企业通过ESG实践驱动绿色创新及相关部门实施分类治理具有启示意义。
Abstract: Based on the macro background of the in-depth development of the digital economy, this study explores the impact of ESG performance on enterprises’ green technology innovation. Achieving the “Dual Carbon” goals requires enterprises to fundamentally transform their development models. ESG provides a comprehensive management framework for enterprises to practice sustainable development, and green technology innovation is the key path to realizing environmental benefits and long-term competitiveness breakthroughs. In the context of the continuous deepening of digital transformation, the combined study of the two is of core significance for understanding how enterprises respond to strategic transformation through specific actions. This paper takes Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2023 as samples to empirically test the impact of ESG performance on enterprises’ green technology innovation, and focuses on exploring the role mechanisms of enterprise reputation and R&D investment. The research findings are as follows: (1) Good ESG performance can significantly promote enterprises’ green technology innovation; (2) Enterprise reputation and R&D investment both play significant partial mediating roles between the two, revealing the key transmission paths of “external resource acquisition” and “internal resource transformation”; (3) Digital transformation can strengthen the relationship between the two, and this effect is more significant in non-state-owned enterprises. The conclusions of this paper provide a mechanism-based basis for understanding the economic consequences of ESG performance in the digital economy era, and have implications for guiding enterprises to drive green innovation through ESG practices and for relevant departments to implement classified governance.
文章引用:翟春璐. 数字经济背景下的ESG表现与企业绿色技术创新[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(1): 551-563. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.151068

参考文献

[1] 武鹏, 杨科, 蒋峻松, 等. 企业ESG表现会影响盈余价值相关性吗? [J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(6): 137-152, 169.
[2] 帅正华. 中国上市公司ESG表现与资本市场稳定[J]. 南方金融, 2022(10): 47-62.
[3] 周方召, 潘婉颖, 付辉. 上市公司ESG责任表现与机构投资者持股偏好——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科学决策, 2020(11): 15-41.
[4] Pedersen, L.H., Fitzgibbons, S. and Pomorski, L. (2021) Responsible Investing: The ESG-Efficient Frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142, 572-597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 邱牧远, 殷红. 生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(3): 108-123.
[6] Goss, A. and Roberts, G.S. (2011) The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Cost of Bank Loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 1794-1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Crifo, P., Forget, V.D. and Teyssier, S. (2015) The Price of Environmental, Social and Governance Practice Disclosure: An Experiment with Professional Private Equity Investors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 168-194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 李增福, 陈嘉滢. 企业ESG表现与短债长用[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(12): 152-171.
[9] 高杰英, 褚冬晓, 廉永辉, 等. ESG表现能改善企业投资效率吗? [J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(11): 24-34, 72.
[10] 胡亚敏, 李建强, 苗连琦. 企业社会责任如何作用于企业价值——基于消费者认知角度的考量[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2016(12): 132-144.
[11] 王琳璘, 廉永辉, 董捷. ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2022(5): 23-34.
[12] 王治, 彭百川. 企业ESG表现对创新绩效的影响[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(24): 164-168.
[13] 肖小虹, 潘也, 王站杰. 企业履行社会责任促进了企业绿色创新吗? [J]. 经济经纬, 2021, 38(3): 114-123.
[14] 李慧云, 刘倩颖, 李舒怡, 等. 环境、社会及治理信息披露与企业绿色创新绩效[J]. 统计研究, 2022, 39(12): 38-54.
[15] 孙皓, 霍爽, 陈国阳. 数字经济发展的绿色技术创新效应研究[J/OL]. 价格理论与实践: 1-7. 2025-12-24.[CrossRef
[16] Coase, R.H. (2013) The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 56, 837-877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 孙慧, 祝树森, 张贤峰. ESG表现、公司透明度与企业声誉[J]. 软科学, 2023, 37(12): 115-121.
[18] 李泽明. 数字经济对企业绿色技术创新的影响——基于融资成本和碳减排约束的中介效应[J]. 统计与决策, 2025, 41(20): 29-34.
[19] 李青爽, 李日昱, 刘笑彤, 等. ESG履责、研发投入与企业新质生产力[J]. 会计之友, 2025(S2): 75-82.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/14.1063.F.20251215.1447.016
[20] 范丹, 孙晓婷. 环境规制、绿色技术创新与绿色经济增长[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(6): 105-115.
[21] 方先明, 胡丁. 企业ESG表现与创新——来自A股上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(2): 91-106.
[22] Deephouse, L.D. (2000) Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource-Based Theories. Journal of Management, 26, 1091-1112.
[23] 韩晓宇, 张兆国. 名人董事长会影响审计收费吗[J]. 会计研究, 2021(11): 178-192.
[24] 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(5): 614-620.
[25] 吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144, 10.
[26] 潘海英, 朱忆丹, 新夫. ESG表现与企业金融化——内外监管双“管”齐下的调节效应[J]. 南京审计大学学报, 2022, 19(2): 60-69.
[27] 陈玲芳, 于海楠. ESG表现、融资约束与企业绩效[J]. 会计之友, 2022(22): 24-30.